Although laughter is probably of deep evolutionary origin, the telling of jokes, being language-based, is likely to be of more recent origin within the human lineage. In language-based communication, speaker and listener are engaged in a process of mutually understanding each other’s intentions (mindstates), with a conversation minimally requiring three orders of intentionality. Mentalizing is cognitively more demanding than non-mentalizing cognition, and there is a well-attested limit at five orders in the levels of intentionality at which normal adult humans can work. Verbal jokes commonly involve commentary on the mindstates of third parties, and each such mindstate adds an additional level of intentionality and its corresponding cognitive load. We determined the number of mentalizing levels in a sample of jokes told by well-known professional comedians and show that most jokes involve either three or five orders of intentionality on the part of the comedian, depending on whether or not the joke involves other individuals’ mindstates. Within this limit there is a positive correlation between increasing levels of intentionality and subjective ratings of how funny the jokes are. The quality of jokes appears to peak when they include five or six levels of intentionality, which suggests that audiences appreciate higher mentalizing complexity whilst working within their natural cognitive constraints.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
We contacted the website authors for more information about these ratings but received no reply.
Bachorowski, J.-A., & Owren, M. J. (2001). Not all laughs are alike: voiced but not unvoiced laughter readily elicits positive affect. Psychological Science, 12, 252–257.
Bressler, E. R., Martin, R. A., & Balshine, S. (2006). Production and appreciation of humor as sexually selected traits. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 121–130.
Canestrari, C., & Bianchi, I. (2012). Perception of contrariety in jokes. Discourse Processes, 49, 539–564.
Carney, J., Wlodarski, R., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2014). Inference or enaction? The impact of genre on the narrative processing of other minds. PloS One, 9(12), e114172.
Cowan, M. L., & Little, A. C. (2012). The effects of relationship context and modality on ratings of funniness. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 496–500.
Curry, O., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2013). Sharing a joke: the effects of a similar sense of humor on affiliation and altruism. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34, 125–129.
Davila Ross, M., Owren, M. J., & Zimmermann, E. (2009). Reconstructing the evolution of laughter in great apes and humans. Current Biology, 19, 1–6.
Dennett, D. (1988). Précis of The intentional stance. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 495–505.
Dezecache, G., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2012). Sharing the joke: the size of natural laughter groups. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 775–779.
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1998). Theory of mind and the evolution of language. In J. Hurford, M. Studdart-Kennedy, & C. Knight (Eds.), Approaches to the evolution of language (pp. 92–110). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dunbar, R. I. M. (2009). Why only humans have language. In R. Botha, & C. Knight (Eds.), The prehistory of language (pp. 12–35). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dunbar, R. I. M. (2012). Bridging the bonding gap: the transition from primates to humans. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, 367B, 1837–1846.
Dunbar, R. I. M. (2014). Human evolution. London: Pelican.
Dunbar, R. I. M., Duncan, N., & Marriot, A. (1997). Human conversational behavior. Human Nature, 8, 231–246.
Dunbar, R.I.M., Baron, R., Frangou, A., Pearce, E., van Leeuwen, E.J.C., Stow, J., Partridge, P., MacDonald, I., Barra, V., & van Vugt, M. (2012). Social laughter is correlated with an elevated pain threshold. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London, 279B, 1161–1167.
Flamson, T., & Barrett, H. C. (2008). The encryption theory of humor: a knowledge-based mechanism of honest signaling. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 261–281.
Forabosco, G. (2008). Is the concept of incongruity still a useful construct for the advancement of humor research. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 4, 45–62.
Gervais, M., & Wilson, D. S. (2005). The evolution and functions of laughter and humor: a synthetic approach. Quarterly Review of Biology, 80, 395–430.
Grammer, K. (1990). Strangers meet: laughter and nonverbal signals of interest in opposite sex encounters. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 14, 209–236.
Grammer, K., & Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1990). The ritualization of laughter. In W. Koch (Ed.), Naturlichkeit der Sprache und der Kultur: Acta colloquii (pp. 192–214). Bochum: Brockmeyer.
Hurley, M. M., Dennett, D. C., & Adams, R. B. (2011). Inside jokes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kinderman, P., Dunbar, R. I. M., & Bentall, R. P. (1998). Theory-of-mind deficits and causal attributions. British Journal of Psychology, 89, 191–204.
Krems, J., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2013). Clique size and network characteristics in hyperlink cinema: constraints of evolved psychology. Human Nature, 24, 414–429.
Lewis, P. A., Rezaie, R., Browne, R., Roberts, N., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2011). Ventromedial prefrontal volume predicts understanding of others and social network size. NeuroImage, 57, 1624–1629.
Li, N. P., Griskevicius, V., Durante, K. M., Jonason, P. K., Pasisz, D. J., & Aumer, K. (2009). An evolutionary perspective on humor: sexual selection or interest indication? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 923–936.
Machin, A. J., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2011). The brain opioid theory of social attachment: a review of the evidence. Behavior, 148, 985–1025.
Mehu, M., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2008). Naturalistic observations of smiling and laughter in human group interactions. Behavior, 145, 1747–1780.
Owren, M. J., & Bachorowski, J.-A. (2003). Reconsidering the evolution of non-linguistic communication: the case of laughter. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27, 183–200.
Powell, J., Lewis, P. A., Dunbar, R. I. M., García-Fiñana, M., & Roberts, N. (2010). Orbital prefrontal cortex volume correlates with social cognitive competence. Neuropsychologia, 48, 3554–3562.
Provine, R. (1996). Laughter: A scientific investigation. London: Faber & Faber.
Ramachandran, V. S. (1998). The neurology and evolution of humor, laughter, and smiling: the false alarm theory. Medical Hypotheses, 51, 351–354.
Rice, K., & Redcay, E. (2014). Spontaneous mentalizing captures variability in the cortical thickness of social brain regions. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. doi:10.1093/scan/nsu081.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Steinberg, D. (1999). 100 Funniest Jokes of All Time. Accessible at http://web.archive.org/web/20110208194810/http://www.worldsbest.in/2011/01/100-funniest-jokes-of-all-time.html
Stiller, J., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2007). Perspective-taking and memory capacity predict social network size. Social Networks, 29, 93–104.
Stiller, J., Nettle, D., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2004). The small world of Shakespeare’s plays. Human Nature, 14, 397–408.
Suls, J. M. (1972). A two-stage model for the appreciation of jokes and cartoons. In J. H. Goldstein (Ed.), The psychology of humor (pp. 81–100). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Vlahovic, T., Roberts, S. B. G., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2012). Effects of duration and laughter on subjective happiness within different modes of communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, 436–450.
The research was supported by European Research Council Advanced Investigator grant #295663 to RD, and by the British Academy Centenary Research Project.
About this article
Cite this article
Dunbar, R.I.M., Launay, J. & Curry, O. The Complexity of Jokes Is Limited by Cognitive Constraints on Mentalizing. Hum Nat 27, 130–140 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-015-9251-6
- Cognitive demand