Venturing into novel terrain poses physical risks to a female and her offspring. Females have a greater tendency to avoid physical harm, while males tend to have larger range sizes and often outperform females in navigation-related tasks. Given this backdrop, we expected that females would explore a novel environment with more caution than males, and that more-cautious exploration would negatively affect navigation performance. Participants explored a novel, large-scale, virtual environment in search of five objects, pointed in the direction of each object from the origin, and then navigated back to the objects. We found that females demonstrated more caution while exploring as reflected in the increased amounts of pausing and revisiting of previously traversed locations. In addition, more pausing and revisiting behaviors led to degradation in navigation performance. Finally, individual levels of trait harm avoidance were positively associated with the amount of revisiting behavior during exploration. These findings support the idea that the fitness costs associated with long-distance travel may encourage females to take a more cautious approach to spatial exploration, and that this caution may partially explain the sex differences in navigation performance.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
The Fréchet distance measures the similarity between two curves by determining the minimum line length required to connect two units as they move along each curve. For example, imagine a dog owner and a dog going for a walk and taking different paths, but staying near each other to some degree. The Fréchet distance simply determines the minimum length of a leash necessary to connect the owner to the dog as they travel through their trajectory. The discrete version of the Fréchet distance is conceptually similar, but instead imagine two frogs that jump from one stone to another, creating a discrete trajectory. The discrete Fréchet distance measures the minimum line length required to connect the frogs at each stone along their trajectory.
Astur, R. S., Tropp, J., Sava, S., Constable, R. T., & Markus, E. J. (2004). Sex differences and correlations in a virtual Morris water task, a virtual radial arm maze, and mental rotation. Behavioural Brain Research, 151(1), 103–115.
Bartumeus, F. (2007). Lévy processes in animal movement: an evolutionary hypothesis. Fractals, 15(2), 1–12.
Boyer, D., Ramos-Fernándex, G., Miramontes, O., Mateos, J. L., Cocho, G., Larralde, H., Ramos, H., & Rojas, F. (2006). Scale-free foraging by primates emerges from their interaction with a complex environment. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 273, 1743–1750.
Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 367–383.
Campbell, A. (1999). Staying alive: evolution, culture, and women’s intrasexual aggression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 203–214.
Clauset, A., Shalizi, C. R., & Newman, M. E. (2009). Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Review, 51(4), 661–703.
Coluccia, E., & Louse, G. (2004). Gender differences in spatial orientation: a review. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 24, 329–340.
Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 448–474.
Cross, C. P., Cyrenne, D.-L. M., & Brown, G. R. (2013). Sex differences in sensation-seeking: a meta-analysis. Scientific Reports, 3(2486), 1–5.
Devlin, A. S., & Bernstein, J. (1995). Interactive wayfinding: use of cues by men and women. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(1), 23–38.
Ecuyer-Dab, I., & Robert, M. (2004). Have sex differences in spatial ability evolved from male competition for mating and female concern for survival? Cognition, 91(3), 221–257.
Gaulin, S. J. C., & Fitzgerald, R. W. (1989). Sexual selection for spatial-learning ability. Animal Behaviour, 37, 322–331.
Gillespie, C. S. (2015). Fitting heavy tailed distributions: the poweRlaw package. Journal of Statistical Software, 64(2), 1–16.
Harris, C. R., Jenkins, M., & Glaser, D. (2006). Gender differences in risk assessment: why do women take fewer risks than men? Judgment and Decision Making, 1(1), 48–63.
Hart, R. (1979). Children’s experience of place. New York: Irvington.
Jasarevic, E., Williams, S. A., Roberts, R. M., Gearly, D. C., & Rosenfeld, C. S. (2012). Spatial navigation strategies in Peromyscus: a comparative study. Animal Behaviour, 84(5), 1141–1149.
Lawton, C. A. (1994). Gender differences in way-finding strategies: relationship to spatial ability and spatial anxiety. Sex Roles, 30(11–12), 765–779.
Lawton, C. A., & Kallai, J. (2002). Gender differences in wayfinding strategies and anxiety about wayfinding: a cross-cultural comparison. Sex Roles, 47(9), 389–401.
MacDonald, D. H., & Hewlett, B. S. (1999). Reproductive interests and forager mobility 1. Current Anthropology, 40(4), 501–524.
Marks, I. M. (1987). Fears, phobias, and rituals: Panic, anxiety, and their disorders. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Matthews, M. H. (1987). Gender, home range and environmental cognition. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 12(1), 43–56.
Miner, E. J., Gurven, M., Kaplan, H., & Gaulin, S. J. (2014). Sex difference in travel is concentrated in adolescence and tracks reproductive interests. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281(1796), 1476.
Moffat, S. D., Hampson, E., & Hatzipantelis, M. (1998). Navigation in a “virtual” maze: sex differences and correlation with psychometric measures of spatial ability in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19(2), 73–87.
Montello, D. R., Lovelace, K. L., Golledge, R. G., & Self, C. M. (1999). Sex-related differences and similarities in geographic and environmental spatial abilities. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 89(3), 515–534.
Munroe, R. L., & Munroe, R. H. (1971). Effect of environmental experience on spatial ability in an East African society. The Journal of Social Psychology, 83(1), 15–22.
Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide, seventh edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. https://www.statmodel.com/download/usersguide/Mplus%20user%20guide%20Ver_7_r3_web.pdf.
Picucci, L., Caffo, A. O., & Bosco, A. (2011). Besides navigation accuracy: gender differences in strategy selection and level of spatial confidence. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(4), 430–438.
Raichlen, D. A., Wood, B. M., Gordon, A. D., Mabulla, A. Z. P., Marlowe, F. W., & Pontzer, H. (2014). Evidence of Levy walk foraging patterns in human hunter-gatherers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(2), 728–733.
Rhee, I., Shin, M., Hong, S., Lee, K., Kim, S. J., & Chong, S. (2011). On the Levy-walk nature of human mobility. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON), 19(3), 630–643.
Richardson, A. E., Montello, D. R., & Hegarty, M. (1999). Spatial knowledge acquisition from maps and from navigation in real and virtual environments. Memory and Cognition, 27, 741–750.
Schmitz, S. (1997). Gender-related strategies in environmental development: Effects of anxiety on wayfinding in and representation of a three-dimensional maze. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17(3), 215–228.
Schmitz, S. (1999). Gender differences in acquisition of environmental knowledge related to wayfinding behavior, spatial anxiety and self-estimated environmental competencies. Sex Roles, 41, 71–93.
Sear, R., & Mace, R. (2008). Who keeps children alive? A review of the effects of kin on child survival. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(1), 1–18.
Shelton, A. L., & McNamara, T. P. (2001). Systems of spatial reference in human memory. Cognitive Psychology, 43(4), 274–310.
Tellegen, A., & Waller, N. G. (2008). Exploring personality through test construction: development of the multidimensional personality questionnaire. The Sage Handbook of Personality Theory and Assessment, 2, 261–292.
Unity (4.6.0) (2014). San Francisco, CA: Unity. Retrieved from https://unity3d.com/unity/whats-new/unity-4.6.
Vashro, L., & Cashdan, E. (2015). Spatial cognition, mobility, and reproductive success in northwestern Namibia. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36(2), 123–129.
Whiting, B. B., & Edwards, C. P. (1992). Children of different worlds: The formation of social behavior. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
This work was supported by NSF Grant IBSS 1329091
An earlier version of this article won a poster award at the Human Behavior and Evolution Society meetings in Natal, Brazil, 2014.
About this article
Cite this article
Gagnon, K.T., Cashdan, E.A., Stefanucci, J.K. et al. Sex Differences in Exploration Behavior and the Relationship to Harm Avoidance. Hum Nat 27, 82–97 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-015-9248-1
- Sex differences
- Harm avoidance