Human Nature

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 16–34 | Cite as

Sex Differences in Mobility and Spatial Cognition

A Test of the Fertility and Parental Care Hypothesis in Northwestern Namibia
Article

Abstract

The fertility and parental care hypothesis interprets sex differences in some spatial-cognitive tasks as an adaptive mechanism to suppress women’s travel. In particular, the hypothesis argues that estrogens constrain travel during key reproductive periods by depressing women’s spatial-cognitive ability. Limiting travel reduces exposure to the dangers and caloric costs of navigating long distances into unfamiliar environments. Our study evaluates a collection of predictions drawn from the fertility and parental care hypothesis among the Twe and Himba people living in a remote region of Namibia. We find that nursing mothers travel more than women at any other stage of their reproductive career. This challenges the assumption that women limit travel during vulnerable and energetically demanding reproductive periods. In addition, we join previous studies in identifying a relationship between spatial ability and traveling among men, but not women. If spatial ability does not influence travel, hormonally induced changes in spatial ability cannot be used as a mechanism to reduce travel. Instead, it appears the fitness consequences of men’s travel is a more likely target for adaptive explanations of the sex differences in spatial ability, navigation, and range size.

Keywords

Mobility Spatial cognition Parental care Namibia Fertility Sex differences 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the National Science Foundation SBE Office of Multidisciplinary Activities for supporting our research (Award #1329091), as well as the entire Spatial Cognition and Mobility (SCAN) group for their role in this project. In addition, we would like to thank the people of the Ovizorowe Valley for their hospitality and patience throughout the project.

References

  1. Bailey, D. A., Lippa, R. A., Del Giudice, M., Hames, R., & Geary, D. C. (2012). Sex differences in spatial abilities: methodological problems in Hoffman et al. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(10), E583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Betzig, L. (2012). Means, variances, and ranges in reproductive success: comparative evidence. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(4), 309–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, G. R., Laland, K. N., & Mulder, M. B. (2009). Bateman’s principles and human sex roles. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24(6), 297–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bryant, K. (1982). Personality correlates of sense of direction and geographic orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(6), 1318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burke, A., Kandler, A., & Good, D. (2012). Women who know their place. Human Nature, 23(2), 133–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clutton-Brock, T. (2007). Sexual selection in males and females. Science, 318(5858), 1882–1885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clutton-Brock, T., & Vincent, A. (1991). Sexual selection and the potential reproductive rates of males and females. Nature, 351(6321), 58–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Collins, D., Busse, C., & Goodall, J. (2008). Infanticide in two populations of savanna baboons. In G. Hausfater, & M. S. B. B. Hrdy (Eds.), Infanticide: comparative and evolutionary perspectives (pp. 193–216). Piscataway: Aldine/Transaction (Originally published in 1984).Google Scholar
  9. Coluccia, E., & Louse, G. (2004). Gender differences in spatial orientation: a review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(3), 329–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Devlin, A. S., & Bernstein, J. (1995). Interactive wayfinding: use of cues by men and women. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(1), 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Driscoll, I., Hamilton, D., Yeo, R., Brooks, W., & Sutherland, R. (2005). Virtual navigation in humans: the impact of age, sex, and hormones on place learning. Hormones and Behavior, 47(3), 326–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dufour, D., & Sauther, M. (2002). Comparative and evolutionary dimensions of the energetics of human pregnancy and lactation. American Journal of Human Biology, 14(5), 584–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Duka, T., Tasker, R., & McGowan, J. (2000). The effects of 3-week estrogen hormone replacement on cognition in elderly healthy females. Psychopharmacology, 149(2), 129–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eals, M., & Silverman, I. (1994). The hunter-gatherer theory of spatial sex differences: proximate factors mediating the female advantage in recall of object arrays. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15(2), 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ecuyer-Dab, I., & Robert, M. (2004a). Have sex differences in spatial ability evolved from male competition for mating and female concern for survival? Cognition, 91(3), 221–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ecuyer-Dab, I., & Robert, M. (2004b). Spatial ability and home-range size: examining the relationship in Western men and women (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 118(2), 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frye, C. (1995). Estrus-associated decrements in a water maze task are limited to acquisition. Physiology & Behavior, 57(1), 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Galea, L., & Kimura, D. (1993). Sex differences in route-learning. Personality and Individual Differences, 14(1), 53–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gaulin, S. (1992). Evolution of sex difference in spatial ability. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 35(S15), 125–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gaulin, S., & FitzGerald, R. (1986). Sex differences in spatial ability: an evolutionary hypothesis and test. American Naturalist, 127(1), 74–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gaulin, S., Hoffman, H., et al. (1988). Evolution and development of sex differences in spatial ability. In L. L. Betzig, M. B. Mulder, & P. Turke (Eds.), Human reproductive behaviour: A Darwinian perspective (pp. 129–152). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Geary, D. (1995). Sexual selection and sex differences in spatial cognition. Learning and Individual Differences, 7(4), 289–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gilmartin, P., & Patton, J. (1984). Comparing the sexes on spatial abilities: map-use skills. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 74(4), 605–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gittleman, J., & Thompson, S. (1988). Energy allocation in mammalian reproduction. American Zoologist, 28(3), 863–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gregor, T. (1987). Anxious pleasures: The sexual lives of an Amazonian people. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hampson, E. (1990). Estrogen-related variations in human spatial and articulatory-motor skills. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 15(2), 97–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hampson, E., & Kimura, D. (1988). Reciprocal effects of hormonal fluctuations on human motor and perceptual-spatial skills. Behavioral Neuroscience, 102(3), 456–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hausmann, M., Slabbekoorn, D., Van Goozen, S. H., Cohen-Kettenis, P. T., & Güntürkün, O. (2000). Sex hormones affect spatial abilities during the menstrual cycle. Behavioral Neuroscience, 114(6), 1245–1250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hegarty, M., Montello, D. R., Richardson, A. E., Ishikawa, T., & Lovelace, K. (2006). Spatial abilities at different scales: individual differences in aptitude-test performance and spatial-layout learning. Intelligence, 34(2), 151–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Henrie, R., Aron, R., Nelson, B., & Poole, D. (1997). Gender-related knowledge variations within geography. Sex Roles, 36(9–10), 605–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Heron, J., O’Connor, T., Evans, J., Golding, J., & Glover, V. (2004). The course of anxiety and depression through pregnancy and the postpartum in a community sample. Journal of Affective Disorders, 80(1), 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hill, K., & Hurtado, M. (1996). Ache life history: The ecology and demography of a foraging people. Hawthorne: Aldine.Google Scholar
  33. Jašarević, E., Williams, S., Roberts, M., Geary, D., & Rosenfeld, C. (2012). Spatial navigation strategies in Peromyscus: a comparative study. Animal Behaviour, 84(5), 1141–1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jones, C., Braithwaite, V., & Healy, S. (2003). The evolution of sex differences in spatial ability. Behavioral Neuroscience, 117(3), 403–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Komnenich, P., Lane, D. M., Dickey, R. P., & Stone, S. C. (1978). Gonadal hormones and cognitive performance. Physiological Psychology, 6(1), 115–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Krug, E., Sharma, G., & Lozano, R. (2000). The global burden of injuries. American Journal of Public Health, 90(4), 523–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lacreuse, A., Herndon, J., Killiany, R., Rosene, D., & Moss, M. (1999). Spatial cognition in rhesus monkeys: male superiority declines with age. Hormones and Behavior, 36(1), 70–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lawton, C. (1994). Gender differences in way-finding strategies: relationship to spatial ability and spatial anxiety. Sex Roles, 30(11–12), 765–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lawton, C. (2010). Gender, spatial abilities, and wayfinding. In J. C. Chrisler, & D. R. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology (pp. 317–341). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Levine, S., Huttenlocher, J., Taylor, A., & Langrock, A. (1999). Early sex differences in spatial skill. Developmental Psychology, 35(4), 940–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: a meta-analysis. Child Development, 56(6), 1479–1498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. MacDonald, D., & Hewlett, B. (1999). Reproductive interests and forager mobility. Current Anthropology, 40(4), 501–524.Google Scholar
  43. McCormick, C., & Teillon, S. (2001). Menstrual cycle variation in spatial ability: relation to salivary cortisol levels. Hormones and Behavior, 39(1), 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Moffat, S., Hampson, E., & Hatzipantelis, M. (1998). Navigation in a “virtual” maze: sex differences and correlation with psychometric measures of spatial ability in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19(2), 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Moffat, S., Zonderman, A., & Resnick, S. (2001). Age differences in spatial memory in a virtual environment navigation task. Neurobiology of Aging, 22(5), 787–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Montello, D. R., Richardson, A. E., Hegarty, M., & Provenza, M. (1999). A comparison of methods for estimating directions in egocentric space. Perception, 28, 981–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Moore, D., & Johnson, S. (2008). Mental rotation in human infants a sex difference. Psychological Science, 19(11), 1063–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Murphy S, Xu J, Kochanek K (2010) Deaths: Final data for 2007. National Vital Statistics Reports 61(4). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr61/nvsr61_04.pdf.
  49. Perdue, B., Snyder, R., Zhihe, Z., Marr, J., & Maple, T. (2011). Sex differences in spatial ability: a test of the range size hypothesis in the order Carnivora. Biology Letters, 7(3), 380–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Picucci, L., Caffò, A. O., & Bosco, A. (2011). Besides navigation accuracy: gender differences in strategy selection and level of spatial confidence. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(4), 430–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pugh, R., & Theakston, R. (1980). Incidence and mortality of snake bite in savanna Nigeria. The Lancet, 316(8205), 1181–1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Quinn, P., & Liben, L. (2008). A sex difference in mental rotation in young infants. Psychological Science, 19(11), 1067–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sanders, B., Soares, M. P., & D’Aquila, J. (1982). The sex difference on one test of spatial visualization: a nontrivial difference. Child Development, 53(4), 1106–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Scelza, B. (2011). Female mobility and postmarital kin access in a patrilocal society. Human Nature, 22(4), 377–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sear, R., & Mace, R. (2008). Who keeps children alive? A review of the effects of kin on child survival. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171(1), 701–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sherry, D., & Hampson, E. (1997). Evolution and the hormonal control of sexually-dimorphic spatial abilities in humans. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1(2), 50–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Silverman, I., Choi, J., Mackewn, A., Fisher, M., Moro, J., & Olshansky, E. (2000). Evolved mechanisms underlying wayfinding: further studies on the hunter-gatherer theory of spatial sex differences. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21(3), 201–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Smuts, B. (1992). Male aggression against women. Human Nature, 3(1), 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Spritzer, M., Solomon, N. G., & Meikle, D. (2005). Influence of scramble competition for mates upon the spatial ability of male meadow voles. Animal Behaviour, 69(2), 375–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stokes, E., Parnell, R., & Olejniczak, C. (2003). Female dispersal and reproductive success in wild Western Lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 54(4), 329–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Treves, A., & Naughton-Treves, L. (1999). Risk and opportunity for humans coexisting with large carnivores. Journal of Human Evolution, 36(3), 275–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Unity (2014) Unity 3D. Available at www.Unity3D.com.
  64. Vashro L (2014) Residence and childcare assistance among the Twe. PhD thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
  65. Vashro, L., & Cashdan, E. (2015). Spatial cognition, mobility, and reproductive success in northwestern Namibia. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36(2), 123–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Viljoen P (1982) The distribution and population status of the larger mammals in Kaokoland, South West Africa/Namibia. Cimbebasia (A) 7(2):5–33 Windhoek Staatsmuseum.Google Scholar
  67. Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 250–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Walker, P. (2001). A bioarchaeological perspective on the history of violence. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30(1), 573–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Watts, D. (1989). Infanticide in mountain gorillas: new cases and a reconsideration of the evidence. Ethology, 81(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Watts, D., & Mitani, J. (2000). Infanticide and cannibalism by male chimpanzees at Ngogo, Kibale National Park, Uganda. Primates, 41(4), 357–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wenzel, A., Haugen, E., Jackson, L., & Robinson, K. (2003). Prevalence of generalized anxiety at eight weeks postpartum. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 6(1), 43–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Willis, S., & Schaie, W. (1988). Gender differences in spatial ability in old age: longitudinal and intervention findings. Sex Roles, 18(3–4), 189–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1985). Competitiveness, risk taking, and violence: the young male syndrome. Ethology and Sociobiology, 6(1), 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Woodfield, R. (1984). Embedded figures test performance before and after childbirth. British Journal of Psychology, 75(1), 81–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA
  2. 2.Department of Psychology, University of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations