Skip to main content
Log in

Competence and the Evolutionary Origins of Status and Power in Humans

  • Published:
Human Nature Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper I propose an evolutionary model of human status that expands upon an earlier model proposed by Henrich and Gil-White Evolution and Human Behavior, 22,165–196 (2001). According to their model, there are two systems of status attainment in humans—“two ways to the top”: the dominance route, which involves physical intimidation, a psychology of fear and hubristic pride, and provides coercive power, and the prestige route, which involves skills and knowledge (competence), a psychology of attraction to experts and authentic pride, and translates mainly into influence. The two systems would have evolved in response to different selective pressures, with attraction to experts serving a social learning function and coinciding with the evolution of cumulative culture. In this paper I argue that (1) the only one way to the top is competence because dominance itself involves competence and confers prestige, so there is no such thing as pure dominance status; (2) dominance in primates has two components: a competitive one involving physical coercion and a cooperative one involving competence-based attraction to high-ranking individuals (proto-prestige); (3) competence grants the same general type of power (dependence-based) in humans and other primates; (4) the attractiveness of high rank in primates is homologous with the admiration of experts in humans; (5) upon the evolution of cumulative culture, the attractiveness of high rank was co-opted to generate status differentials in a vast number of culturally generated domains of activity. I also discuss, in this perspective, the origins of hubristic pride, authentic pride, and nonauthoritarian leadership.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aknin, L. B., et al. (2013). Prosocial spending and well-being: cross-cultural evidence for a psychological universal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 635–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Algo, S. B., & Haidt, J. (2009). Witnessing excellence in action: the “other-praising” emotions of elevation, gratitude, and admiration. Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 105–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacharach, S. B., & Lawler, E. J. (1980). Power and politics in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, M., Nettle, D., & Roberts, G. (2006). Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biology Letters, 2, 412–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, R., & Smith, E. A. (2005). Signaling theory, strategic interaction, and symbolic capital. Current Anthropology, 46, 221–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blass, T. (1999). The Milgram paradigm after 35 years: some things we now know about obedience to authority. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 955–978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, C. (1993). Egalitarian behavior and reverse dominance hierarchy. Current Anthropology, 34, 227–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, C. (2012). Moral origins: The evolution of virtue, altruism, and shame. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (1987). On cultural and reproductice success: Kipsigis evidence. American Anthropologist, 89, 617–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. (1996). Why culture is common, but cultural evolution is rare. Proceedings of the British Academy, 88, 77–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, P., & Bergstrom, B. (2008). Evolutionary perspectives on religion. Annual Review of Anthropology, 37, 111–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 187–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. (2007). Evolutionary approaches to literature and drama. In R. I. M. Dunbar & L. Barrett (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 637–648). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chagnon, N. (1988). Life histories, blood revenge, and warfare in a tribal population. Science, 239, 985–992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapais, B. (1983). Matriline membership and male rhesus reaching high ranks in their natal troop. In R. A. Hinde (Ed.), Primate social relationships: An integrated approach (pp. 171–175). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapais, B. (1986). Why do adult male and female rhesus monkeys affiliate during the birth season? In R. G. Rawlins & M. Kessler (Eds.), The Cayo Santiago macaques (pp. 173–200). Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapais, B. (1991). Primates and the origins of aggression, power, and politics among humans. In J. D. Loy & C. B. Peters (Eds.), Understanding behavior: What primate studies tell us about human behavior (pp. 190–228). New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Chapais, B. (1992). Role of alliances in the social inheritance of rank among female primates. In A. H. Harcourt & F. B. M. de Waal (Eds.), Coalitions and alliances in humans and other animals (pp. 29–60). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapais, B. (1995). Alliances as a means of competition in primates: evolutionary, developmental and cognitive aspects. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 38, 115–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapais, B. (2006). Kinship, competence and cooperation in primates. In P. M. Kappeler & C. P. van Schaik (Eds.), Cooperation in primates and humans: Mechanisms and evolution (pp. 47–64). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chapais, B. (2008). Primeval kinship: How pair-bonding gave birth to human society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapais, B. (2011). The evolutionary history of pair-bonding and parental collaboration. In C. Salmon & T. Shackelford (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of evolutionary family psychology (pp. 33–50). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapais, B. (2013). Monogamy, strongly bonded groups, and the evolution of human social structure. Evolutionary Anthropology, 22, 52–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapais, B., & Mignault, C. (1991). Homosexual incest avoidance among females in captive Japanese macaques. American Journal of Primatology, 23, 171–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapais, B., Girard, M., & Primi, G. (1991). Non-kin alliances, and the stability of matrilineal dominance relations in Japanese macaques. Animal Behaviour, 41, 481–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapais, B., Gauthier, C., & Prud’homme, J. (1995). Dominance competition through affiliation and support in Japanese macaques: an experimental study. International Journal of Primatology, 16, 521–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapais, B., Savard, L., & Gauthier, C. (2001). Kin selection and the distribution of altruism in relation to degree of kinship in Japanese macaques. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 49, 493–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., & Henrich, J. (2010). Pride, personality, and the evolutionary foundations of human social status. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 334–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., Foulsham, T., Kingstone, A., & Henrich, J. (2013). Two ways to the top : evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 103–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. (2013). Integrating basic and higher-cognitive emotions within a common evolutionary framework: lessons from the transformation of primate dominance into human pride. Philosophical Psychology, 26, 437–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, K., Crusius, J., & Mussweiler, T. (2011). Social comparison: Motives, standards, and mechanisms. In D. Chadee (Ed.), Theories in social psychology (pp. 119–139). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crépeau, R. (1988). Le chamane achuar. Thérapeutique et socio-politique. Recherches Amérindiennes au Québec, 18, 101–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, F. B. M. (1982). Chimpanzee politics. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, L. G., Kendal, R. L., Schapiro, S. J., Thierry, B., & Laland, K. N. (2012). Identification of the social and cognitive processes underlying human cumulative culture. Science, 335, 1114–1118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, K. G., Wrangham, R. W., & Silk, J. B. (2007). Male chimpanzees exchange political support for mating opportunities. Current Biology, 17, R586–R587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27, 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E., & Camerer, C. F. (2007). Social neuroeconomics: the neural cicuitry of social preferences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 419–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fessler, D. M. T. (2007). From appeasement to conformity: Evolutionary and cultural perspectives on shame, competition and cooperation. In J. L. Tracy, R. W. Robins, & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), The self-conscious emotions: Theory and research (pp. 174–193). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fessler, D. M. T., & Gervais, M. (2010). From whence the captains of our lives: Ultimate and phylogenetic perspectives on emotions in humans and other primates. In P. Kappeler & J. Silk (Eds.), Mind the gap: Tracing the origins of human universals (pp. 261–280). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gilby, I. C. (2006). Meat sharing among the Gombe chimpanzees: harassment and reciprocal exchange. Animal Behaviour, 71, 953–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurven, M. (2004). To give and to give not: the behavioral ecology of human food transfers. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 543–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurven, M., & von Rueden, C. (2006). Hunting, social status, and biological fitness. Social Biology, 53, 81–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurven, M., Allen-Arave, W., Hill, K., & Hurtado, M. (2000). “It’s a wonderful life”: signaling generosity among the Ache of Paraguay. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 263–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haley, K. J., & Fessler, D. M. T. (2005). Nobody’s watching? Subtle cues affect generosity in a anonymous economic game. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 245–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harbaugh, W. T. (1998a). The prestige motive for making charitable transfers. American Economic Review, 88, 277–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbaugh, W. T. (1998b). What do donations buy? A model of philantropy based on prestige and warm glow. Journal of Public Economics, 67, 269–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harbaugh, W. T., Mayr, U., & Burghart, D. R. (2007). Neural responses to taxation and voluntary giving reveal motives for charitable donations. Science, 316, 1622–1625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J., & Gil-White, F. J. (2001). The evolution of prestige: freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 165–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henzi, S. P., Barrett, L., Gaynor, D., Greeff, T., Weingrill, T., & Hill, R. A. (2003). Effect of resource competition on the long-term allocation of grooming by female baboons: evaluating Seyfarth's model. Animal Behaviour, 66, 931–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irons, W. (1979). Cultural and biological success. In N. A. Chagnon & W. Irons (Eds.), Evolutionary biology and human social behavior: An anthropological perspective (pp. 257–272). North Sciutate: Duxbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izuma, K., Saito, D. N., & Sadato, N. (2010). Processing of the incentive for social approval in the ventral striatum during charitable donation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 621–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, H., & Hill, K. (1985). Hunting ability and reproductive success among the Ache foragers: preliminary results. Current Anthropology, 26, 131–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, H. S., Hill, K. R., Lancaster, B., & Hurtado, A. M. (2000). A theory of human life history evolution: diet, intelligence, and longevity. Evolutionary Anthropology, 9, 156–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. (2000). Self-conscious emotions: Embarassment, pride, shame, and guilt. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 623–636). New York: Guiford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. (2002). Beyond dominance: the importance of leverage. Quarterly Review of Biology, 77, 149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milinski, M., Semmann, D., & Krambeck, H. (2002). Donors to charity gain in both indirect reciprocity and political reputation. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B, 269, 881–883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitani, J., & Watts, D. (2001). Why do chimpanzees hunt and share meat? Animal Behaviour, 61, 915–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moll, J., Krueger, F., Zahn, R., Pardini, M., de Oliveira-Souza, R., & Grafman, J. (2006). Human fronto-mesolimbic networks guide decisions about charitable donations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 15623–15628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishida, T. (1983). Alpha status and agonostic alliaces in wilf chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii). Primates, 24, 318–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schino, G. (2001). Grooming, competition and social rank among female primates: a meta-analysis. Animal Behaviour, 62, 265–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schino, G. (2007). Grooming and agonistic support: a meta-analysis of primate reciprocal altruism. Behavioral Ecology, 18, 115–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seyfarth, R. M. (1977). A model of social grooming among adult female monkeys. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 65, 671–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seyfarth, R. M. (1980). The distribution of grooming and related behaviours among adult female vervet monkeys. Animal Behaviour, 28, 798–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seyfarth, R. M., & Cheney, D. (1984). Grooming, alliances, and reciprocal altruism in vervet monkeys. Nature, 308, 541–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. A. (2004). Why do good hunters have higher reproductive success. Human Nature, 15, 343–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stammbach, E. (1988). Group responses to specially skilled individuals in a Macaca fascicularis group. Behaviour, 107, 241–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi, H., Kato, M., Matsuura, M., Mobbs, D., Suhara, T., & Okubo, Y. (2009). When your gain is my pain and your pain is my gain: neural correlates of envy and schadenfreude. Science, 323, 937–939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tennie, C., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Ratcheting up the ratchet: on the evolution of cumulative culture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364, 2404–2415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiddi, B., Aureli, F., Schino, G., & Voelkl, B. (2011). Social relationships between adult females and the alpha male in wild tufted capuchin monkeys. American Journal of Primatology, 73, 812–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiddi, B., Aureli, F., & Schino, G. (2012). Grooming up the hierarchy : the exchange of grooming and rank-related benefits in a New World primate. PLoS One, 7, 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of human communication. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M., Kruger, A. A., & Ratner, H. H. (1993). Cultural learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 496–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, J. L., & Matsumoto, D. (2008). The spontaneous expression of pride and shame: evidence for biologicaly innate nonverbal displays. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 11655–11660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, J. L., Shariff, A. F., & Cheng, J. T. (2010). A naturalist’s view of pride. Emotion Review, 2, 163–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, J. L., Shariff, A. F., Zhao, W., & Henrich, J. (2013). Cross-cultural evidence that the pride expression is a universal automatic status signal. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 142, 163–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Noordwijk, M. A., & van Schaik, C. P. (2009). Intersexual food transfer among orangutans: do females test males for coercive tendency? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 63, 883–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Vugt, M. (2006). Evolutionary origins of leadership and followership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 354–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Rueden, C., Gurven, M., & Kaplan, H. (2011). Why do men seek status? Fitness payoffs to dominance and prestige. Proceedings of the Royal Society, 278, 2223–2232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Altruistic helping in human infants and young chimpanzees. Science, 31, 1301–1303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisfeld, G. E., & Dillon, L. M. (2012). Applying the dominance hierarchy model to pride and shame, and related behaviors. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 10, 15–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodburn, J. (1982). Egalitarian societies. Man, 17, 431–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank Robert Crépeau, Evelyne Gauthier, Kim Hill, Shona Teijeiro, Robert Walker, and three anonymous reviewers for helpful discussions or comments on the manuscript, and Evelyne Gauthier for help with the figures.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernard Chapais.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chapais, B. Competence and the Evolutionary Origins of Status and Power in Humans. Hum Nat 26, 161–183 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-015-9227-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-015-9227-6

Keywords

Navigation