Different Selection Pressures Give Rise to Distinct Ethnic Phenomena

A Functionalist Framework with Illustrations from the Peruvian Altiplano

Abstract

Many accounts of ethnic phenomena imply that processes such as stereotyping, essentialism, ethnocentrism, and intergroup hostility stem from a unitary adaptation for reasoning about groups. This is partly justified by the phenomena’s co-occurrence in correlational studies. Here we argue that these behaviors are better modeled as functionally independent adaptations that arose in response to different selection pressures throughout human evolution. As such, different mechanisms may be triggered by different group boundaries within a single society. We illustrate this functionalist framework using ethnographic work from the Quechua-Aymara language boundary in the Peruvian Altiplano. We show that different group boundaries motivate different ethnic phenomena. For example, people have strong stereotypes about socioeconomic categories, which are not cooperative units, whereas they hold fewer stereotypes about communities, which are the primary focus of cooperative activity. We also show that, despite the cross-cultural importance of ethnolinguistic boundaries, the Quechua-Aymara linguistic distinction does not strongly motivate any of these intergroup processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. Ahn, W., Kalish, C., Gelman, S. A., Medin, D. L., Luhmann, C., Atran, S., Coley, J. D., & Shafto, P. (2001). Why essences are essential in the psychology of concepts. Cognition, 82, 59–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Allport, G. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Astuti, R., Carey, S., & Solomon, G. (2004). Constraints on conceptual development: a case study of the acquisition of folkbiological and folksociological knowledge in Madagascar. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 69(3), 1–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Axelrod, R., Hammond, R., & Grafen, A. (2004). Altruism via kin selection strategies that rely on arbitrary tags with which they coevolve. Evolution, 58(8), 1833–1838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barbujani, G., Magagni, A., Minch, E., & Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. (1997). An apportionment of human DNA diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94(9), 4516–4519.

  6. Baron, A., & Banaji, M. (2006). The development of implicit attitudes evidence of race evaluations from ages 6 and 10 and adulthood. Psychological Science, 17(1), 53–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Barrett, C. (2001). On the functional origins of essentialism. Mind and Society, 3(2), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bastian, B., & Haslam, N. (2006). Psychological essentialism and stereotype endorsement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(2), 228–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bell, A. V., Richerson, P. J., & McElreath, R. (2009). Culture rather than genes provides greater scope for the evolution of large-scale human prosociality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(42), 17671–17674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bigler, R. S., & Liben, L. S. (2006). A developmental intergroup theory of social stereotypes and prejudice. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 34(3), 39–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2004). Persistent parochialism: trust and exclusion in ethnic networks. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 55, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. (1992). Punishment allows the evolution of cooperation (or anything else) in sizable groups. Ethology and Sociobiology, 13, 171–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. (1996). Why culture is common, but cultural evolution is rare. Proceedings of the British Academy, 88, 77–93.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brase, G. (2001). Reasoning about coalitions: using markers of social group membership as probabilistic cues in reasoning tasks. Thinking and Reasoning, 7(4), 313–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: ingroup love or outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Brewer, M. (2007). The importance of being we: human nature and intergroup relations. American Psychologist, 62(8), 726–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Brubaker, R. (2004). Ethnicity without groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cashdan, E. (2001). Ethnocentrism and xenophobia: a cross-cultural study. Current Anthropology, 42(5), 760–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cerrón-Palomino, R. (2010). Contactos y desplazamientos lingüísticos en los Andes centrosureños : el puquina, el aimara y el quechua. Boletín de Arqueología PUCP, 14, 255–282.

  20. Choi, J.-K., & Bowles, S. (2007). The coevolution of parochial altruism and war. Science, 318(5850), 636–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cohen, E. (2012). The evolution of tag-based cooperation in humans. Current Anthropology, 53(5), 588–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Coley, J. D., Medin, D. L., & Atran, S. (1997). Does rank have its privilege? Inductive inferences within folkbiological taxonomies. Cognition, 64, 73–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cottrell, C. A., & Neuberg, S. L. (2005). Different emotional reactions to different groups: a sociofunctional threat-based approach to “prejudice.”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(5), 770–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. DeScioli, P., & Kurzban, R. (2009). The alliance hypothesis for human friendship. PLoS One, 4(6), e5802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dominguez Faura, N. (2010). Para una cartografía de la lengua puquina en el altiplano colonial (1548–1610). Boletín de Arqueología PUCP, 14, 309–328.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gelman, S. A. (2005). The essential child. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Giles, H. (1977). Language, ethnicity and intergroup relations. London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gil-White, F. J. (2001). Are ethnic groups biological “species” to the human brain? Essentialism in our cognition of some social categories. Current Anthropology, 42(4), 515–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Greenwald, A. G., Mcghee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition the implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–1480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Halperin, E., Russell, A. G., Trzesniewski, K. H., Gross, J. J., & Dweck, C. S. (2011). Promoting the peace process by changing beliefs about group malleability. Science, 333(6050), 1767–1769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hardman, M. J., Klein, H. M., & Stark, L. (1985). Aymara and Quechua: languages in contact. In H. Manelis Klein & L. Stark (Eds.), South American languages: retrospect and prospect (pp. 617–643). Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Haslam, N., Rothschild, L., & Ernst, D. (2000). Essentialist beliefs about social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 113–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Haslam, N., Rothschild, L., & Ernst, D. (2002). Are essentialist beliefs associated with prejudice? British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 87–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Heggarty, P. (2008). Linguistics for archaeologists: a case-study in the Andes. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 18(1), 35–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Henrich, J. (2009). The evolution of costly displays, cooperation and religion: credibility enhancing displays and their implications for cultural evolution. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 244–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Henrich, J., Heine, S., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Heyman, G., & Gelman, S. (2000). Preschool children’s use of novel predicates to make inductive inferences about people. Cognitive Development, 15(3), 263–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hilton, J. L., & von Hippel, W. (1996). Stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 237–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hirschfeld, L. A. (1998). Race in the making: Cognition, culture, and the child’s construction of human kinds. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hosokawa, K. (1980). Diagnostico sociolinguistico de la region norte de Potosi. La Paz: Instituto Nacional de Estudios Lingüísticos (INEL).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hunley, K., & Long, J. C. (2005). Gene flow across linguistic boundaries in native North American populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(5), 1312–1317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hymes, D. (1962). The ethnography of speaking. In T. Gladwin & W. Sturtevant (Eds.), Anthropology and human behavior (pp. 13–53). Washington, DC: Anthropological Society of Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  43. INEI (Instituto Nacional de Estadistica e Informatica), Government of Peru (2007). Censos nacionales. Retrieved from http://www.inei.gob.pe/.

  44. Jackson, J. (1983). The fish people: linguistic exogamy and Tukanoan identity in Northwest Amazonia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Kalmijn, M. (1998). Intermarriage and homogamy: causes, patterns, trends. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 395–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kanovsky, M. (2007). Essentialism and folksociology: ethnicity again. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 7(3–4), 241–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Kinzler, K., Dupoux, E., & Spelke, E. (2007). The native language of social cognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(30), 12577–12580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Kurzban, R., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2001). Can race be erased? Coalitional computation and social categorization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(26), 15387–15392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Lamba, S., & Mace, R. (2011). Demography and ecology drive variation in cooperation across human populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(35), 14426–14430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Lamba, S., & Mace, R. (2013). The evolution of fairness: explaining variation in bargaining behaviour. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 280, 2012–2028.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Leslie S-J (2015) The original sin of cognition: fear, prejudice, and generalization. Journal of Philosophy, in press.

  52. Lyle, H. F., & Smith, E. A. (2014). The reputational and social network benefits of prosociality in an Andean community. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(13), 4820–4825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Mannheim, B. (1991). The language of the Inka since the European invasion. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Mathew, S., & Boyd, R. (2011). Punishment sustains large-scale cooperation in prestate warfare. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(28), 11375–11380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Maynard Smith, J. (2004). Animal signals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  56. McElreath, R., Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2003). Shared norms and the evolution of ethnic markers. Current Anthropology, 44(1), 122–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Michalopoulos, S. (2012). The origins of ethnolinguistic diversity. American Economic Review, 102(4), 1508–1539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Moerman, M. (1965). Ethnic identification in a complex civilization: who are the Lue? American Anthropologist, 67(5), 1215–1230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Moya, C. (2013). Evolved priors for ethnolinguistic categorization: a case study from the Quechua-Aymara boundary in the Peruvian Altiplano. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34, 265–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Moya, C., & Scelza, B. (2015). The effect of recent ethnogenesis and migration histories on perceptions of ethnic group stability. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 15, 135–177.

  61. Moya, C., Boyd, R., & Henrich, J. (2015). Reasoning about cultural and genetic transmission: developmental and cross-cultural evidence from Peru, Fiji and the US on how people make inferences about trait transmission. Topics in Cognitive Science, in press.

  62. Nettle, D. (1998). Explaining global patterns of language diversity. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 17(4), 354–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Nettle, D., & Dunbar, R. (1997). Social markers and the evolution of reciprocal exchange. Current Anthropology, 38(1), 93–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Orlove, B. (1998). Down to earth: race and substance in the Andes. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 17(2), 207–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Pietraszewski, D., & Schwartz, A. (2013). Evidence that accent is a dedicated dimension of social categorization, not a byproduct of coalitional categorization. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35, 51–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Primov, G. (1974). Aymara-Quechua relations in Puno. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 15(3–4), 167–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Radcliffe, S. A., & Westwood, S. (1996). Remaking the nation: Place, identity and politics in Latin America. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Richerson, P., & Boyd, R. (2001). The evolution of subjective commitment to groups: A tribal instincts hypothesis. In R. Nesse (Ed.), Evolution and the capacity for commitment (pp. 186–220). New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Richerson, P., & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Roberts, G., & Sherratt, T. (2001). Does similarity breed cooperation? Nature, 418, 499–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Schaller, M., & Neuberg, S. (2008). Intergroup prejudices and intergroup conflicts. In C. Crawford & D. Krebs (Eds.), Foundations of evolutionary psychology (pp. 401–414). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Schelling, T. (1971). Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1(2), 143–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Silva, A., & Mace, R. (2014). Cooperation and conflict: field experiments in Northern Ireland. Proceedings of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences, 281(1792), 20141435. doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.1435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Strevens, M. (2000). The essentialist aspect of naive theories. Cognition, 74(2), 149–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In S. Worchel & W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Van den Berghe, P. (1987). The ethnic phenomenon. Westport: Praeger Paperback.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Wiessner, P. (1982). Risk, reciprocity and social influences on! Kung San economics. In E. Leacock & R. Lee (Eds.), Politics and history in band societies (pp. 61–84). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Wimmer, A. (2013). Ethnic boundary making:Institutions, power, networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank our participants in Huatasani and our research assistants in the field: Saida Calancho, Mesa Dobek, and Sandy Enriquez. Clark Barrett, Dan Fessler, and three anonymous reviewers gave constructive feedback on earlier versions of this paper. This research was supported by National Institutes of Health grant 1RC1TW008631 and an International Cognition and Culture Institute mini-grant. This work was exempted by the UCLA Office for the Protection of Research Subjects, #08-169.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cristina Moya.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 799 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moya, C., Boyd, R. Different Selection Pressures Give Rise to Distinct Ethnic Phenomena. Hum Nat 26, 1–27 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-015-9224-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Ethnicity
  • Categorization
  • Intergroup relations
  • Stereotyping
  • Essentialism
  • Cooperation