Human Nature

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 620–630 | Cite as

Toward a Reality-Based Understanding of Hadza Men’s Work

A Response to Hawkes et al. (2014)
Article

Abstract

Observations of Hadza men foraging out of camp and sharing food in camp show that men seeking to maximize the flow of calories to their families should pursue large game, and that hunting large game does not pose a collective action problem. These data also show that Hadza men frequently pursued honey, small game, and fruit, and that by doing so, provided a more regular flow of food to their households than would a putative big game specialist. These data support our earlier studies demonstrating that the goal of family provisioning is a robust predictor of Hadza men’s behavior. As before, the show-off and costly signaling hypotheses advanced by Hawkes and colleagues fail as both descriptions of and explanations for Hadza men’s work.

Keywords

Hadza Hunter-gatherers Provisioning Hunting Costly signaling Show-off hypothesis 

Supplementary material

12110_2014_9218_MOESM1_ESM.docx (32 kb)
ESM 1(DOCX 32.4 kb)

References

  1. Berbesque, J. C., & Marlowe, F. (2009). Sex differences in food preferences of Hadza hunter-gatherers. Evolutionary Psychology, 7(4), 601–616.Google Scholar
  2. Estes, R. (1991). The behavior guide to African mammals: Including hoofed mammals, carnivores, primates. Berkeley: Univeristy of California Press.Google Scholar
  3. Hawkes, K. (1991). Showing off: tests of an hypothesis about men’s foraging. Ethology and Sociobiology, 12(1), 29–54.Google Scholar
  4. Hawkes, K., Hill, K., & O’Connell, J. F. (1982). Why hunters gather: optimal foraging and the Ache of eastern Paraguay. American Ethnologist, 9(2), 379–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hawkes, K., O’Connell, J. F., & Blurton Jones, N. G. (1997). Hadza women’s time allocation, offspring provisioning and the evolution of post-menopausal lifespans. Current Anthropology, 38(4), 551–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hawkes, K., O’Connell, J. F., & Blurton Jones, N. G. (2001). Hadza meat sharing. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22(2), 113–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hawkes, K., O’Connell, J. F., & Blurton Jones N. G. (2014). More lessons from the Hadza about men’s work. Human Nature 25(4). doi:10.1007/s12110-014-9212-5
  8. Jaeggi, A. V., & Gurven, M. (2013). Reciprocity explains food sharing in humans and other primates independent of kin selection and tolerated scrounging: a phylogenetic meta-analysis. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 280(1768), 20131615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kingdon, J. (2013). The Kingdon field guide to African mammals. London: A&C Black.Google Scholar
  10. Marlowe, F. W. (2004). Mate preferences among Hadza hunter-gatherers. Human Nature, 15(4), 365–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Marlowe, F. W., & Berbesque, J. C. (2009). Tubers as fallback foods and their impact on Hadza hunter-gatherers. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 140(4), 751–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Marlowe, F., Berbesque, J. C., Wood, B. M., Crittenden, A., Porter, C., & Mabulla, A. (2014). Honey, hunter-gatherers, and human evolution. Journal of Human Evolution, 71, 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. O’Connell, J. F., & Hawkes, K. (1981). Alyawara plant use and optimal foraging theory. In B. Winterhalder & E. A. Smith (Eds.), Hunter-gatherer foraging strategies: Ethnographic and archaeological analyses (pp. 99–125). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Oiseaux.net (2014). Ecopains d’abord 2014. Available from http://www.oiseaux.net/.
  15. Wood, B. M. (2006). Prestige or provisioning? A test of foraging goals among the Hadza. Current Anthropology, 47(2), 383–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wood, B. M., & Marlowe, F. W. (2013). Household and kin provisioning by Hadza men. Human Nature, 24(3), 280–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wood, B. M., Pontzer, H., Raichlen, D. A., & Marlowe, F. (2014). Mutualism and manipulation in Hadza-honeyguide interactions. Evolution and Human Behavior. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.07.007.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyYale UniversityNew HavenUSA
  2. 2.Division of Biological AnthropologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations