Advertisement

Human Nature

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 448–464 | Cite as

Fosterage as a System of Dispersed Cooperative Breeding

Evidence from the Himba
  • Brooke A. ScelzaEmail author
  • Joan B. Silk
Article

Abstract

Humans are obligate cooperative breeders, relying heavily on support from kin to raise children. To date, most studies of cooperative breeding have focused on help that supplements rather than replaces parental care. Here we propose that fosterage can act as a form of dispersed cooperative breeding, one that enhances women’s fitness by allowing them to disinvest in some children and reallocate effort to others. We test this hypothesis through a series of predictions about the costs and benefits of fosterage for mothers, foster parents, and foster children using data from the Himba, a group of Namibian agro-pastoralists. We show that fostering out children enhances mothers’ fitness, and we provide evidence for a causal link from fosterage to enhanced fitness by showing that fosterage of early-born children is associated with greater maternal reproductive success. Foster parents minimize the costs of fosterage by skewing their care toward their postreproductive years, and by mainly fostering close kin. However, the system is associated with some detrimental effects on foster children, who are more likely to be stunted and underweight than their non-fostered counterparts.

Keywords

Fosterage Cooperative breeding Himba Child nutrition 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would, first and foremost, like to thank the Himba familes who participated in this research for their cooperation, patience, and hospitality. We would also like to thank Kemuu Jakurama (1976–2012), whose local knowledge and expertise were essential to this research and whose warm heart and good humor made the fieldwork so much more fun. BAS would also like to thank Michael Bollig, who first alerted me to the prominence of the fosterage system among the Himba, and Steve Josephson, who provided indispensable support during my initial trip to Namibia. This work was generously funded by the Wenner Gren Foundation and the UCLA Center for the Study of Women.

References

  1. Ainsworth, M. (1996) Economic aspects of child fostering in Cote d’Ivoire. In P. Schultz (Ed.) Research in population economics vol. 8 (pp. 25–62). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  2. Akresh, R. (2009). Flexibility of household structure in child fostering decisions in Burkina Faso. Journal of Human Resources, 44, 976–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alber, E. (2003). Denying biological parenthood: fosterage in Northern Benin. Ethnos, 68, 487–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anokhi, P., DeSilva, M. B., Cakwe, M., Quinlan, R., Simon, J., Skalicky, A., & Zhuwau, R. (2007). Exploring the Cinderella myth: intrahousehold differences in child wellbeing between orphans and non-orphans in Amajuba district, south africa. AIDS, 21, S95–S103.Google Scholar
  5. Betzig, L. (1988). Adoption by rank on Ifaluk. American Anthropologist, 90, 111–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bledsoe, C. (1990). No success without struggle: social mobility and hardship for foster children in Sierra Leone. Man, 25, 70–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bledsoe, C., Ewbank, D. C., & Isiugo-Abanihe, U. C. (1988). The effect of child fostering on feeding practices and access to health services in rural Sierra Leone. Social Science and Medicine, 27, 627–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bledsoe, C., & Isiugo-Abanihe, U. (1989). Strategies of child-fosterage among Mende grannies in Sierra Leone. In R. J. Lesthaeghe (Ed.), Reproduction and social organization in sub-Saharan Africa (pp. 442–474). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bollig, M. (2006). Risk management in a hazardous environment: a comparative study of two pastoral societies. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Borgerhoff-Mulder, M. (1985). Bridewealth and its correlates: quantifying changes over time. Current Anthropology, 36, 573–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bowie, F. (Ed.). (2004). Cross-cultural approaches to adoption. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Carroll, V. (1970). Adoption on Nukuoro. In B. Carroll (Ed.), Adoption in Eastern Oceania (pp. 121–157). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  13. Castle, S. E. (1995). Child fostering and children’s nutritional outcomes in rural Mali: the role of female status in directing child transfers. Social Science and Medicine, 40, 679–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1985). Child abuse and other risks of not living with both parents. Ethology and Sociobiology, 6, 197–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goody, J. (1969). Adoption in cross-cultural perspective. Comparative Studies in Social History, 11, 55–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guemple, L. (1979). Inuit Adoption. Canadian Ethnology Service, Mercury Series No. 47. Ottawa: National Museums of Canada.Google Scholar
  17. Hawkes, K., O’Connell, J. F., & Blurton Jones, N. G. (1997). Hadza women’s time allocation, offspring provisioning, and the evolution of long postmenopausal life spans. Current Anthropology, 38, 551–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hawkes, K., O’Connell, J. F., Blurton Jones, N. G., Alvarez, H., & Charnov, E. L. (1998). Grandmothering, menopause and the evolution of human life histories. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 95, 1336–1339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hill, K., & Hurtado, A. M. (1996). Ache life history: the ecology and demography of a foraging people. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  20. Hrdy, S. B. (2005). Cooperative breeders with an ace in the hole. In E. Voland, A. Chasiotis, & W. Schiefencovel (Eds.), Grandmotherhood: The evolutionary significance of the second half of female life (pp. 295–317). New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hrdy, S. B. (2009). Mothers and others. Cambridge: Belknap.Google Scholar
  22. Isiugo-Abanihe, U. C. (1985). Child fosterage in West Africa. Population and Development Review, 11, 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lindblade, K. A., Odihambo, F., Rosen, D. H., & DeCock, K. M. (2003). Health and nutritional status of orphans <6 years old care for by relatives in western Kenya. Tropical Medicine and International Health, 8, 67–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Little, M. A., Galvin, K., & Mugambi, M. (1983). Cross-sectional growth of nomadic Turkana pastoralists. Human Biology, 55, 811–830.Google Scholar
  25. Mace, R. (2000). Evolutionary ecology of human life history. Animal Behavior, 59, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Madhavan, S., & Townsend, N. (2007). The social context of children’s nutritional status in rural South Africa. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 35, 107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Malan, J. S. (1973). Double descent among the Himba of South West Africa. Cimbebasia, 2, 81–112.Google Scholar
  28. Malan, J. S. (1995). Peoples of Namibia. Pretoria: Haum.Google Scholar
  29. Monasch, R., & Boerma, J. T. (2004). Orphanhood and childcare patterns in sub-Saharan Africa: an analysis of national surveys from 40 countries. AIDS, 18, S55–S65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Oleke, C., Blystad, A., Moland, K. M., Rekdal, O. B., & Heggenhougen, K. (2006). The varying vulnerability of African orphans: the case of the Langi, northern Uganda. Childhood, 13, 267–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pennington, R. (1991). Child fostering as a reproductive strategy among southern African pastoralists. Ethology and Sociobiology, 12, 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. RendeTaylor, L. (2005). Patterns of child fosterage in rural northern Thailand. Journal of Biosocial Science, 37, 333–350.Google Scholar
  33. Sahlins, M. D. (1976). The use and abuse of biology: An anthropological critique of sociobiology. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  34. Scelza, B. A. (2011a). Female mobility and postmarital kin access in a patrilocal society. Human Nature, 22, 377–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Scelza, B. A. (2011b). Female choice and extra-pair paternity in a traditional human population. Biology Letters, 7, 889–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Scelza, B. A. (2014). Jealousy in a small-scale, natural fertility population: the roles of paternity, investment and love in jealous response. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35, 103–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sear, R., & Mace, R. (2008). Who keeps children alive? A review of the effects of kin on child survival. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sear, R., Mace, R., & McGregor, I. (2000). Maternal grandmothers improve nutritional status and survival of children in rural Gambia. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 267, 1641–1647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sellen, D. W. (2000). Age, sex and anthropometric status of children in an African pastoral community. Annals of Human Biology, 27, 345–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shell-Duncan, B. (1994). Child fostering among nomadic Turkana pastoralists: demographic and health consequences. In E. Fratkin, K. A. Galvin, & E. A. Roth (Eds.), African pastoralist systems: An integrated approach (pp. 147–164). Boulder, CO: Rienner.Google Scholar
  41. Silk, J. B. (1980). Adoption and kinship in Oceania. American Anthropologist, 82, 799–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Silk, J. B. (1987a). Adoption among the Inuit. Ethos, 15, 320–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Silk, J. B. (1987b). Adoption and fosterage in human societies: Adaptations or enigmas? Cultural Anthropology, 2, 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Silk, J. B. (1990). Human adoption in evolutionary perspective. Human Nature, 1, 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sudre, P., Serdula, M., Binkin, N., Staehling, N., & Kramer, M. (1990). Child fostering, health and nutritional status: the experience of Swaziland. Ecology of Food and Nutrition, 24, 181–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  47. Trivers, R. L. (1974). Parent-offspring conflict. American Zoologist, 14, 249–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Volk, A. A. (2011). Adoption: forms, functions and preferences. In C. Salmon & T. Shackelford (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Family Psychology (pp.113–127). NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.School of Human Evolution & Social ChangeArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations