Human Nature

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 328–341 | Cite as

The Clock Is Ticking

The Sound of a Ticking Clock Speeds Up Women’s Attitudes on Reproductive Timing
Article

Abstract

The “biological clock” serves as a powerful metaphor that reflects the constraints posed by female reproductive biology. The biological clock refers to the progression of time from puberty to menopause, marking the period during which women can conceive children. Findings from two experiments suggest that priming the passage of time through the sound of a ticking clock influenced various aspects of women’s (but not men’s) reproductive timing. Moreover, consistent with recent research from the domain of life history theory, those effects depended on women’s childhood socioeconomic status (SES). The subtle sound of a ticking clock led low (but not high) SES women to reduce the age at which they sought to get married and have their first child (Study 1), as well as the priority they placed on the social status and long-term earning potential of potential romantic partners (Study 2). Findings suggest that early developmental sensitization processes can interact with subtle environmental stimuli to affect reproductive timing during adulthood.

Keywords

Life History Theory Reproductive timing Mate preferences Sex differences Priming Evolutionary psychology 

References

  1. Ackerman, J. M., Nocera, C. C., & Bargh, J. A. (2010). Incidental haptic sensations influence social judgments and decisions. Science, 328, 1712–1715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balcetis, E. & Dunning, D. (2010). Wishful seeing: More desired objects are seen as closer. Psychological Science, 21, 147152.Google Scholar
  3. Belsky, J., Schlomer, G. L., & Ellis, B. J. (2012). Beyond cumulative risk: Distinguishing harshness and unpredictability as determinants of parenting and early life history strategy. Developmental Psychology, 48, 662–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belsky, J., Steinberg, L., & Draper, P. (1991). Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy: An evolutionary theory of socialization. Child Development, 62, 647–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Del Giudice, M., Ellis, B. J., & Shirtcliff, E. A. (2011). The Adaptive Calibration Model of stress responsivity. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, 1562–1592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ellis, B. J. (2004). Timing of pubertal maturation in girls: An integrated life history approach. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 920–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fabian, D., & Flatt, T. (2012). Life history evolution. Nature Education Knowledge, 3(10), 24.Google Scholar
  8. Fay, A. J., & Maner, J. K. (2012). Warmth, spatial proximity, and social attachment: The embodied perception of a social metaphor. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(6), 1369–1372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Griskevicius, V., Ackerman, J. A., Cantu, S. M., Delton, A. W., Robertson, T. E., Simpson, J. A., & Tybur, J. M. (2013). When the economy falters, do people spend or save? Responses to resource scarcity depend on childhood environment. Psychological Science, 24, 197–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Griskevicius, V., Delton, A. W., Robertson, T. E., & Tybur, J. M. (2011a). The environmental contingency of life history strategies: Influences of mortality and socioeconomic status on reproductive timing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 241–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Delton, A. W., & Robertson, T. E. (2011b). The influence of mortality and socioeconomic status on risk and delayed rewards: A life history theory approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 1015–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haselton, M. G., & Gangestad, S. W. (2006). Conditional expression of female desires and male mate retention efforts across the human ovulatory cycle. Hormones and Behavior, 49, 509–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kaplan, H. S., & Gangestad, S. W. (2005). Life history theory and evolutionary psychology. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 68–95). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Kaschak, M. P., & Maner, J. K. (2009). Embodiment, evolution, and social cognition: An integrative framework. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 1236–1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lee, S. W. S., & Schwarz, N. (2012). Bidirectionality, mediation, and moderation of metaphorical effects: The embodiment of social suspicion and fishy smells. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 737–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li, N. P., & Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short term mates: What, whether and why. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 468–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li, N. P., Kenrick, D. T., Bailey, J. M., & Linsenmeier, J. A. (2002). The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: Testing the tradeoffs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 947–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mucignat-Caretta, C., Caretta, A., & Cavaggioni, A. (1995). Pheromonally accelerated puberty is enhanced by previous experience of the same stimulus. Physiology and Behavior, 57, 901–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schröder, T., & Thagard, P. (2013). The affective meanings of automatic social behaviors: Three mechanisms that explain priming. Psychological Review, 120, 255–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Simpson, J. A., Griskevicius, V., Kuo, S. I.-C., Sung, S., & Collins, W. A. (2012). Evolution, stress, and sensitive periods: The influence of unpredictability in early versus late childhood on sex and risky behavior. Developmental Psychology, 48, 674–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Williams, L. E., & Bargh, J. A. (2008). Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth. Science, 322, 606–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Florida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations