Human Nature

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 410–429 | Cite as

What Can Cross-Cultural Correlations Teach Us about Human Nature?

  • Thomas V. Pollet
  • Joshua M. Tybur
  • Willem E. Frankenhuis
  • Ian J. Rickard
Article

Abstract

Many recent evolutionary psychology and human behavioral ecology studies have tested hypotheses by examining correlations between variables measured at a group level (e.g., state, country, continent). In such analyses, variables collected for each aggregation are often taken to be representative of the individuals present within them, and relationships between such variables are presumed to reflect individual-level processes. There are multiple reasons to exercise caution when doing so, including: (1) the ecological fallacy, whereby relationships observed at the aggregate level do not accurately represent individual-level processes; (2) non-independence of data points, which violates assumptions of the inferential techniques used in null hypothesis testing; and (3) cross-cultural non-equivalence of measurement (differences in construct validity between groups). We provide examples of how each of these gives rise to problems in the context of testing evolutionary hypotheses about human behavior, and we offer some suggestions for future research.

Keywords

Ecological fallacy Cross-cultural research Research methods Simpson’s paradox Non-independence Measurement equivalence 

References

  1. Anand, S., & Sen, A. (1994). Human Development Index: methodology and measurement. Human Development Occasional Paper No. 2. Oxford University Press on behalf of the United Nations Development Program. Available online at http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/oc12.pdf
  2. Anderson, K. G. (2010). Life expectancy and the timing of life history events in developing countries. Human Nature, 21(2), 103–123. doi:10.1007/s12110-010-9087-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Apostolou, M. (2010). Sexual selection under parental choice in agropastoral societies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(1), 39–47. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.06.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150–166. doi:10.1177/1088868306294907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2009). The HEXACO–60: a short measure of the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(4), 340–345. doi:10.1080/00223890902935878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barber, N. (2000). The sex ratio as a predictor of cross-national variation in violent crime. Cross Cultural Research, 34(3), 264–282. doi:10.1177/106939710003400304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barber, N. (2003). Paternal investment prospects and cross-national differences in single parenthood. CrossCultural Research, 37(2), 163–177. doi:10.1177/1069397103037002001.Google Scholar
  8. Barthes, J., Godelle, B., & Raymond, M. (2013). Human social stratification and hypergyny: toward an understanding of male homosexual preference. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(3), 155–163. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.01.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (2001). Using phylogenetically based comparative methods in anthropology: more questions than answers. Evolutionary Anthropology Issues News and Reviews, 10(3), 99–111. doi:10.1002/evan.1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Borgerhoff Mulder, M., Nunn, C. L., & Towner, M. C. (2006). Cultural macroevolution and the transmission of traits. Evolutionary Anthropology Issues News and Reviews, 15(2), 52–64. doi:10.1002/evan.20088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Borgerhoff Mulder, M., Bowles, S., Hertz, T., Bell, A., Beise, J., Clark, G., & Hooper, P. L. (2009). Intergenerational wealth transmission and the dynamics of inequality in small-scale societies. Science, 326(5953), 682–688. doi:10.1126/science.1178336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bosker, R. J., Kremers, E. J. J., & Lugthart, E. (1990). School and instruction effects on mathematics achievement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 1(4), 233–248. doi:10.1080/0924345900010401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boyce, M. S., & McDonald, L. L. (1999). Relating populations to habitats using resource selection functions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14(7), 268–272. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01593-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Brand, A., & Bradley, M. T. (2012). More voodoo correlations: when average-based measures inflate correlations. Journal of General Psychology, 139(4), 260–272. doi:10.1080/00221309.2012.703711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brand, A., Bradley, M. T., Best, L. A., & Stoica, G. (2010). Multiple trials may yield exaggerated effect size estimates. Journal of General Psychology, 138(1), 1–11. doi:10.1080/00221309.2010.520360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brashares, J. S., Arcese, P., Sam, M. K., Coppolillo, P. B., Sinclair, A. R. E., & Balmford, A. (2004). Bushmeat hunting, wildlife declines, and fish supply in West Africa. Science, 306(5699), 1180–1183. doi:10.1126/science.1102425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brown, J. L., Morales, V., & Summers, K. (2009). Home range size and location in relation to reproductive resources in poison frogs (Dendrobatidae): a Monte Carlo approach using GIS data. Animal Behaviour, 77(2), 547–554. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.10.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Burger, J., Kirchner, M., Bramanti, B., Haak, W., & Thomas, M. G. (2007). Absence of the lactase-persistence-associated allele in early Neolithic Europeans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(10), 3736–3741. doi:10.1073/pnas.0607187104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Byrne, B. M. (2009). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Byrne, B. M., & Campbell, T. L. (1999). Cross-cultural comparisons and the presumption of equivalent measurement and theoretical structure. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30(5), 555–574. doi:10.1177/0022022199030005001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cagliani, R., Guerini, F. R., Fumagalli, M., Riva, S., Agliardi, C., Galimberti, D., & Fenoglio, C. (2012). A trans-specific polymorphism in ZC3HAV1 is maintained by long-standing balancing selection and may confer susceptibility to multiple sclerosis. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 29(6), 1599–1613. doi:10.1093/molbev/mss002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cashdan, E., & Steele, M. (2013). Pathogen prevalence, group bias, and collectivism in the standard cross-cultural sample. Human Nature, 24, 59–75. doi:10.1007/s12110-012-9159-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cavusgil, S. T., & Das, A. (1997). Methodological issues in empirical cross-cultural research: a survey of the management literature and a framework. Management International Review, 37(1), 71–96.Google Scholar
  25. Chang, K.-T. (2003). Introduction to geographic information systems. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  26. Comaroff, J. L. (1980). The meaning of marriage payments. London: Academic.Google Scholar
  27. Connolly, P. (2006). Summary statistics, educational achievement gaps and the ecological fallacy. Oxford Review of Education, 32(02), 235–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Costa, P. T., & MacCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO FFI): Professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  29. Currie, T. E., & Mace, R. (2012). Analyses do not support the parasite-stress theory of human sociality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(2), 83–85. doi:10.1017/S0140525X11000963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Currie, T. E., Greenhill, S. J., Gray, R. D., Hasegawa, T., & Mace, R. (2010). Rise and fall of political complexity in island South-East Asia and the Pacific. Nature, 467(7317), 801–804. doi:10.1038/nature09461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dahl, E., Ivar Elstad, J., Hofoss, D., & Martin-Mollard, M. (2006). For whom is income inequality most harmful? A multi-level analysis of income inequality and mortality in Norway. Social Science and Medicine, 63(10), 2562–2574. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.06.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Dama, M. S. (2011). Sex ratio at birth and mortality rates are negatively related in humans. PLoS One, 6(8), e23792. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dama, M. S. (2012). Parasite stress predicts offspring sex ratio. PLoS One, 7(9), e46169. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Dama, M. S. (2013). Cognitive ability correlates positively with son birth and predicts cross-cultural variation of the offspring sex ratio. Naturwissenschaften, 100(6), 559–569. doi:10.1007/s00114-013-1052-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Crawford, J. R., Welling, L. L. M., & Little, A. C. (2010). The health of a nation predicts their mate preferences: cross-cultural variation in women’s preferences for masculinized male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277(1692), 2405–2410. doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.2184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Crawford, J. R., & Welling, L. L. M. (2011). Further evidence for regional variation in women’s masculinity preferences. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278(1707), 813–814. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.2200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. DEFRA. (2011). Family food datasets. Retrieved June 6, 2012, from http://www.defra.gov.uk/statistics/foodfarm/food/familyfood/datasets/.
  38. Dow, M. M. (2007). Galton’s Problem as multiple network autocorrelation effects cultural trait transmission and ecological constraint. Cross Cultural Research, 41(4), 336–363. doi:10.1177/1069397107305452.Google Scholar
  39. Dow, M. M., & Eff, E. A. (2008). Global, regional, and local network autocorrelation in the standard cross-cultural sample. Cross Cultural Research, 42(2), 148–171. doi:10.1177/1069397107311186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Duncan, L. A., Schaller, M., & Park, J. H. (2009). Perceived vulnerability to disease: development and validation of a 15-item self-report instrument. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(6), 541–546. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.05.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Dutton, D. G. (1994). Patriarchy and wife assault: the ecological fallacy. Violence and Victims, 9(2), 167–182.Google Scholar
  42. Eff, E. A. (2004). Does Mr. Galton still have a problem? Autocorrelation in the standard cross-cultural sample. World Cultures, 15(2), 153–170.Google Scholar
  43. Eggan, F. (1954). Social anthropology and the method of controlled comparison. American Anthropologist, 56(5), 743–763. doi:10.1525/aa.1954.56.5.02a00020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Eppig, C., Fincher, C. L., & Thornhill, R. (2010). Parasite prevalence and the worldwide distribution of cognitive ability. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277(1701), 3801–3808. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.0973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Eppig, C., Fincher, C. L., & Thornhill, R. (2011). Parasite prevalence and the distribution of intelligence among the states of the USA. Intelligence, 39(3), 155–160. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2011.02.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Fincher, C. L., & Thornhill, R. (2012). Parasite-stress promotes in-group assortative sociality: the cases of strong family ties and heightened religiosity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(2), 65–79. doi:10.1017/S0140525X11000021.Google Scholar
  47. Fincher, C. L., Thornhill, R., Murray, D. R., & Schaller, M. (2008). Pathogen prevalence predicts human cross-cultural variability in individualism/collectivism. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275(1640), 1279–1285. doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.0094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Firebaugh, G. (1978). A rule for inferring individual-level relationships from aggregate data. American Sociological Review, 43(4), 557–572. doi:10.2307/2094779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Frankenhuis, W. E., & Panchanathan, K. (2011). Balancing sampling and specialization: an adaptationist model of incremental development. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278(1724), 3558–3565. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.0055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Frankenhuis, W. E., Panchanathan, K., & Clark Barrett, H. (2013). Bridging developmental systems theory and evolutionary psychology using dynamic optimization. Developmental Science, 16(4), 584–98. doi:10.1111/desc.12053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Gelman, A., Shor, B., Bafumi, J., & Park, D. (2007). Rich state, poor state, red state, blue state: what’s the matter with Connecticut? Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 2(4), 345–367. doi:10.1561/100.00006026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Golding, J., Pembrey, M., & Jones, R. (2001). ALSPAC–the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 15(1), 74–87. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3016.2001.00325.x.
  54. Gravelle, H. (1998). How much of the relation between population mortality and unequal distribution of income is a statistical artefact? British Medical Journal, 316(7128), 382–385. doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7128.382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Delton, A. W., & Robertson, T. E. (2011). The influence of mortality and socioeconomic status on risk and delayed rewards: a life history theory approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(6), 1015–1026. doi:10.1037/a0022403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Hackman, J., & Hruschka, D. (2013). Fast life histories, not pathogens, account for state-level variation in homicide, child maltreatment, and family ties in the U.S. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(2), 118–124. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.11.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Hammel, E. A. (1980). The comparative method in anthropological perspective. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 22(2), 145–155. doi:10.2307/178402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Hare, B., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2001). Do chimpanzees know what conspecifics know? Animal Behaviour, 61(1), 139–151. doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Harvey, P. H., Read, A. F., & Nee, S. (1995). Why ecologists need to be phylogenetically challenged. Journal of Ecology, 83(3), 535–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Hawkes, K. (1994). On life-history evolution. Current Anthropology, 35(1), 39–41. doi:10.2307/2744136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Peng, K., & Greenholtz, J. (2002). What’s wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert scales? The reference-group effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 903–918. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Heine, S. J., Buchtel, E. E., & Norenzayan, A. (2008). What do cross-national comparisons of personality traits tell us? Psychological Science, 19(4), 309–313. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02085.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0999152X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Herkenrath, M. (2002). Quantitative cross-national analysis as a research tool in the sociology of developing countries: a critical examination. Current Sociology, 50(4), 517–530. doi:10.1177/0011392102050004003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Hill, K. R., Walker, R. S., Božičević, M., Eder, J., Headland, T., Hewlett, B., & Wood, B. (2011). Co-residence patterns in hunter-gatherer societies show unique human social structure. Science, 331(6022), 1286–1289. doi:10.1126/science.1199071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Holý, L. (1987). Comparative anthropology. (L. Holý, Ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  67. Howell, D. C. (2010). Fundamental statistics for the behavioral sciences. Belmont: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  68. Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: techniques and applications. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  69. Hui, C. H., & Triandis, H. C. (1985). Measurement in cross-cultural psychology. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 16(2), 131–152. doi:10.1177/0022002185016002001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Huisman, M., Oldehinkel, A. J., De Winter, A., Minderaa, R. B., De Bildt, A., Huizink, A. C., & Ormel, J. (2008). Cohort profile: the Dutch “TRacking Adolescents’ Individual Lives Survey” (TRAILS). International Journal of Epidemiology, 37(6), 1227–1235. doi:10.1093/ije/dym273.
  71. John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: history, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: theory and research (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 102–138). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  72. Kanazawa, S. (2006). IQ and the wealth of states. Intelligence, 34(6), 593–600. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2006.04.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Kievit, R. A., Frankenhuis, W. E., Waldorp, L. J., & Borsboom, D. (2013). Simpson’s Paradox in psychological science: a practical guide. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 513. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. King, G., Murray, C. J. L., Salomon, J. A., & Tandon, A. (2003). Enhancing the validity and cross-cultural comparability of measurement in survey research. The American Political Science Review, 97(4), 567–583. doi:10.1017/S000305540400108X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Kruger, D. J., & Nesse, R. M. (2006). An evolutionary life-history framework for understanding sex differences in human mortality rates. Human Nature, 17(1), 74–97. doi:10.1007/s12110-006-1021-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Kruger, D. J., & Schlemmer, E. (2009). When men are scarce, good men are even harder to find: life history, the sex ratio, and the proportion of men married. Journal of Social Evolutionary and Cultural Psychology, 3(2), 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(2), 329–358. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Little, A. C., Apicella, C. L., & Marlowe, F. W. (2007). Preferences for symmetry in human faces in two cultures: data from the UK and the Hadza, an isolated group of hunter-gatherers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274(1629), 3113–3117. doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.0895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Lubinski, D., & Humphreys, L. G. (1996). Seeing the forest from the trees: when predicting the behavior or status of groups, correlate means. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2(2), 363. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.2.2.363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. MacCallum, R. C., & Austin, J. T. (2000). Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 201–226. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Mace, R., & Pagel, M. (1994). The comparative method in anthropology. Current Anthropology, 35(5), 549–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Mace, R., Jordan, F., & Holden, C. (2003). Testing evolutionary hypotheses about human biological adaptation using cross-cultural comparison. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology. Part A, Molecular & Integrative Physiology, 136(1), 85–94. doi:10.1016/S1095-6433(03)00019-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Marlowe, F. W. (2003). The mating system of foragers in the standard cross-cultural sample. Cross Cultural Research, 37(3), 282–306. doi:10.1177/1069397103254008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Marlowe, F. W., Berbesque, J. C., Barr, A., Barrett, C., Bolyanatz, A., Cardenas, J. C., & Tracer, D. (2008). More “altruistic” punishment in larger societies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275(1634), 587–592. doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.1517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Marlowe, F. W., Berbesque, J. C., Barrett, C., Bolyanatz, A., Gurven, M., & Tracer, D. (2011). The “spiteful” origins of human cooperation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278(1715), 2159–2164. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.2342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. McCormick, C. M. (2013). Watch where and how you stick pins when playing with voodoo correlations. Journal of General Psychology, 140(1), 82–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. McCulloch, C. E., & Neuhaus, J. M. (2001). Generalized linear mixed models. New York: Wiley Online Library.Google Scholar
  88. Menzel, H. (1950). Comment on Robinson’s “Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals.” American Sociological Review, 15, 674.Google Scholar
  89. Mgawe, P., Borgerhoff Mulder, M., Caro, T., Martin, A., & Kiffner, C. (2012). Factors affecting bushmeat consumption in the Katavi-Rukwa ecosystem of Tanzania. Tropical Conservation Science, 5(4), 446–462.Google Scholar
  90. Moore, J. H. (1994). Putting anthropology back together again: the ethnogenetic critique of cladistic theory. American Anthropologist, 96(4), 925–948. doi:10.2307/682452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Moore, F. R., Coetzee, V., Contreras-Garduño, J., Debruine, L. M., Kleisner, K., Krams, I., … Suzuki, T. N. (2013). Cross-cultural variation in women’s preferences for cues to sex- and stress-hormones in the male face. Biology Letters, 9(3). doi:10.1098/rsbl.2013.0050.Google Scholar
  92. Murdock, G. P., & White, D. R. (1969). Standard cross-cultural sample. Ethnology, 8(4), 329–369. doi:10.2307/3772907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Naroll, R. (1965). Galton’s Problem: the logic of cross-cultural analysis. Social Research, 32(4), 428–451.Google Scholar
  94. Nasif, E. G., Al-Daeaj, H., Ebrahimi, B., & Thibodeaux, M. S. (1991). Methodological problems in cross-cultural research: an updated review. Management International Review, 31(1), 79–91.Google Scholar
  95. National Child Development Study. (n.d.). National Child Development Study. Retrieved June 06, 2012, from http://www.esds.ac.uk/longitudinal/access/ncds/l33004.asp.
  96. Nee, S., Read, A. F., Greenwood, J. J. D., & Harvey, P. H. (1991). The relationship between abundance and body size in British birds. Nature, 351(6324), 312–313. doi:10.1038/351312a0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Nee, S., Read, A. F., & Harvey, P. H. (1996). Why phylogenies are necessary for comparative analysis. In E. P. Martins (Ed.), Phylogenies and the comparative method in animal behavior (pp. 399–411). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  98. Nettle, D. (2009). Ecological influences on human behavioural diversity: a review of recent findings. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24(11), 618–624. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.05.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Piantadosi, S., Byar, D. P., & Green, S. B. (1988). The ecological fallacy. American Journal of Epidemiology, 127(5), 893–904.Google Scholar
  100. Plewis, I., Ketende, S., & Millennium Cohort Study. (2006). Millennium Cohort Study. Technical Report on Responses. Retrieved from http://www.esds.ac.uk/longitudinal/access/mcs/l33359.asp.
  101. Poortinga, Y. H. (1989). Equivalence of cross-cultural data: an overview of basic issues. International Journal of Psychology, 24(1), 737–756. doi:10.1080/00207598908247842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Powell, A., Shennan, S., & Thomas, M. G. (2009). Late Pleistocene demography and the appearance of modern human behavior. Science, 324(5932), 1298–1301. doi:10.1126/science.1170165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Quinlan, R., & Quinlan, M. (2008). Human lactation, pair-bonds, and alloparents. Human Nature, 19(1), 87–102. doi:10.1007/s12110-007-9026-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  105. Raven, J. (2000). Raven’s progressive matrices: change and stability over culture and time. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 1–48. doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Rehkopf, D. H., & Buka, S. L. (2006). The association between suicide and the socio-economic characteristics of geographical areas: a systematic review. Psychological Medicine, 36(02), 145–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Robinson, W. S. (1950). Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review, 15(3), 351–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Ross, M. H., & Homer, E. (1976). Galton’s Problem in cross-national research. World Politics, 29(1), 1–28. doi:10.2307/2010045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Rushton, S. P., Lurz, P. W. W., Fuller, R., & Garson, P. J. (1997). Modelling the distribution of the red and grey squirrel at the landscape scale: a combined GIS and population dynamics approach. Journal of Applied Ecology, 34(5), 1137–1154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Schaller, M., & Murray, D. R. (2008). Pathogens, personality, and culture: disease prevalence predicts worldwide variability in sociosexuality, extraversion, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 212–221. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Scheiner, S. M., Cox, S. B., Willig, M., Mittelbach, G. G., Osenberg, C., & Kaspari, M. (2000). Species richness, species-area curves and Simpson’s Paradox. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 2(6), 791–802. doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00279.2010.Google Scholar
  112. Schmitt, D. P., Realo, A., Voracek, M., & Allik, J. (2008). Why can’t a man be more like a woman? Sex differences in Big Five personality traits across 55 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(1), 168–182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Schwartz, S. (1994). The fallacy of the ecological fallacy: the potential misuse of a concept and the consequences. American Journal of Public Health, 84(5), 819–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Sheppard, L. (2003). Insights on bias and information in group‐level studies. Biostatistics, 4(2), 265–278. doi:10.1093/biostatistics/4.2.265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Shrira, I., Wisman, A., & Webster, G. D. (2013). Guns, germs, and stealing: exploring the link between infectious disease and crime. Evolutionary Psychology, 11(1), 270–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Simpson, E. H. (1951). The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Methodological), 13(2), 238–241. doi:10.1038/168063d0.Google Scholar
  117. Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  118. Stephen, I. D., Scott, I. M. L., Coetzee, V., Pound, N., Perrett, D. I., & Penton-Voak, I. S. (2012). Cross-cultural effects of color, but not morphological masculinity, on perceived attractiveness of men’s faces. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(4), 260–267. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.10.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Subramanian, S. V., Jones, K., Kaddour, A., & Krieger, N. (2009). Revisiting Robinson: the perils of individualistic and ecologic fallacy. International Journal of Epidemiology, 38(2), 342–360. doi:10.1093/ije/dyn359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. (2007). National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, 1997. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR). doi:10.3886/ICPSR03959.v2.
  121. Te Grotenhuis, M., Eisinga, R., & Subramanian, S. V. (2011). Robinson’s ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals: methodological corrections. International Journal of Epidemiology, 40(4), 1123–1125. doi:10.1093/ije/dyn357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Terracciano, A., Abdel-Khalek, A. M., Adam, N., Adamovova, L., Ahn, C., Ahn, H., & Angleitner, A. (2005). National character does not reflect mean personality trait levels in 49 cultures. Science, 310(5745), 96–100. doi:10.1126/science.1117199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Thomas, F., Daoust, S. P., Elguero, E., & Raymond, M. (2013). Do mothers from rich and well-nourished countries bear more sons? Journal of Evolutionary Medicine, 1, 1–11. doi:10.4303/jem/235568.Google Scholar
  124. Thorndike, E. L. (1939). On the fallacy of imputing the correlations found for groups to the individuals or smaller groups composing them. American Journal of Psychology, 52(1), 122–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Thornhill, R., & Fincher, C. L. (2011). Parasite stress promotes homicide and child maltreatment. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences, 366(1583), 3466–3477. doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Tovée, M. J., Swami, V., Furnham, A., & Mangalparsad, R. (2006). Changing perceptions of attractiveness as observers are exposed to a different culture. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(6), 443–456. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.05.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Towner, M. C., Grote, M. N., Venti, J., & Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (2012). Cultural macroevolution on neighbor graphs. Human Nature, 23(3), 283–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Turchin, P., Currie, T. E., Turner, E. A. L., & Gavrilets, S. (2013). War, space, and the evolution of Old World complex societies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(41), 16384–16389. doi:10.1073/pnas.1308825110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Tybur, J. M., & De Vries, R. E. (2013). Disgust sensitivity and the HEXACO model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(6), 660–665. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.05.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Tybur, J. M., Bryan, A. D., Lieberman, D., Caldwell Hooper, A. E., & Merriman, L. A. (2011). Sex differences and sex similarities in disgust sensitivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(3), 343–348. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.04.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2011). Human Development Index (HDI) data. http://hdr.undp.org/en/statistics/hdi. Accessed November 2011.
  132. Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  133. Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (2000). Methodological issues in psychological research on culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31(1), 33–51. doi:10.1177/0022022100031001004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Tanzer, N. K. (2004). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment: an overview. Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée/European Review of Applied Psychology, 54(2), 119–135. doi:10.1016/j.erap.2003.12.004.
  135. Vleesbarometer. (2011). Thuisverbruik (Home Consumption). Retrieved June 06, 2012, from http://www.vlam.be/marketinformationdocument/files/Thuisverbruik2010.pdf.
  136. Von Korff, M., Koepsell, T., Curry, S., & Diehr, P. (1992). Multi-level analysis in epidemiologic research on health behaviors and outcomes. American Journal of Epidemiology, 135(10), 1077–1082.Google Scholar
  137. Vul, E., Harris, C., Winkielman, P., & Pashler, H. (2009). Puzzlingly high correlations in fMRI studies of emotion, personality, and social cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(3), 274–290. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01125.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Waller, L. A., & Gotway, C. A. (2004). Applied spatial statistics for public health data. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Wasserman, E. A. (1993). Comparative cognition: beginning the second century of the study of animal intelligence. Psychological Bulletin, 113(2), 211–228. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.113.2.211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Wechsler, D. (1981). WAIS-R manual: wechsler adult intelligence scale-revised. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  141. Wells, J. C. K. (2012). Sexual dimorphism in body composition across human populations: associations with climate and proxies for short- and long-term energy supply. American Journal of Human Biology, 24(4), 411–419. doi:10.1002/ajhb.22223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. West-Eberhard, M. J. (2003). Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  143. White, D. R., Betzig, L., Mulder, M. B., Chick, G., Hartung, J., Irons, W., & Spencer, P. (1988). Rethinking polygyny: co-wives, codes, and cultural systems [and comments and reply]. Current Anthropology, 29(4), 529–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Wilkie, D. S., Starkey, M., Abernethy, K., Effa, E. N., Telfer, P., & Godoy, R. (2005). Role of prices and wealth in consumer demand for bushmeat in Gabon, Central Africa. Conservation Biology, 19(1), 268–274. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00372.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Wilkin, T. A., Garant, D., Gosler, A. G., & Sheldon, B. C. (2006). Density effects on life‐history traits in a wild population of the great tit Parus major: analyses of long‐term data with GIS techniques. Journal of Animal Ecology, 75(2), 604–615. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01078.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Winkleby, M., Cubbin, C., & Ahn, D. (2006). Effect of cross-level interaction between individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status on adult mortality rates. American Journal of Public Health, 96(12), 2145–2153. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2004.060970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Wolff, H., Chong, H., & Auffhammer, M. (2011). Classification, detection and consequences of data error: evidence from the human development index. The Economic Journal, 121(553), 843–847. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2010.02408.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Yip, P. S. F., & Liu, K. Y. (2006). The ecological fallacy and the gender ratio of suicide in China. British Journal of Psychiatry, 189(5), 465–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. York, R., & Gossard, M. H. (2004). Cross-national meat and fish consumption: exploring the effects of modernization and ecological context. Ecological Economics, 48(3), 293–302. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.10.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas V. Pollet
    • 1
  • Joshua M. Tybur
    • 1
  • Willem E. Frankenhuis
    • 2
  • Ian J. Rickard
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Social and Organizational PsychologyVU University AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Behavioural Science InstituteRadboud University NijmegenNijmegenNetherlands
  3. 3.Department of AnthropologyDurham UniversityDurhamUK

Personalised recommendations