Abstract
A variety of non-human females do not select male partners independently. Instead they favor males having previous associations with other females, a phenomenon known as mate copying. This paper investigates whether humans also exhibit mate copying and whether consistent positive information about a man’s mate value, and a woman’s age and self-perceived mate value (SPMV), influence her tendency to copy the mate choices of others. Female university students (N = 123) rated the desirability of photographed men pictured alone or with one, two, or five women represented by silhouettes. In accordance with the visual arrays, men were described as currently in a romantic relationship; having previously been in one, two, or five relationships; or not having had a romantic relationship in the past 4 years. Women generally rated men pictured with one or two previous partners as more desirable than those with none. Men depicted with five previous partners, however, were found to be less desirable. Younger, presumably less experienced women had a greater tendency to mate copy compared with older women, but high SPMV did not predict greater levels of mate copying. The findings reaffirmed and expanded those suggesting that women do not make mate choices independently.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Agrawal, A. F. (2001). The evolutionary consequences of mate copying on male traits. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 51, 33–40.
Berman, G., & Cutler, B. L. (1996). Effects of inconsistencies in eyewitness testimony on mock-juror decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 170–177.
Bertrandias, L., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2006). Some psychological motivations for fashion opinion seeking. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 10, 25–40.
Biesanz, J. C., West, S. G., & Millevoi, A. (2007). What do you learn about someone over time? The relationship between length of acquaintance and consensus and self-other agreement in judgments of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 119–135.
Botwin, M. D., Buss, D. M., & Shackleford, K. (1997). Personality and mate preferences: five factors in mate selection and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 65, 107–136.
Braun, C., Gruendl, M., Marberger, C. & Scherber, C. (2001). Beautycheck: causes and consequences of human facial attractiveness [Summary]. Available online at http://www.uniregensburg.de/Fakultaeten/phil_Fak_II/Psychologie/Psy_II/beautycheck/english/zusammen/zusammen1.htm.
Brown, G. R., & Fawcett, T. W. (2005). Sexual selection: copycat mating in birds. Current Biology, 15, 626–628.
Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.
Buss, D. M. (1992). Mate preference mechanisms: Consequences for partner choice and intrasexual competition. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 249–266). New York: Oxford University Press.
Buss, D. M., & Barnes, M. (1986). Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(3), 559–570.
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.
Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (2008). Attractive women want it all: good genes, economic investment, parenting proclivities, and emotional commitment. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 134–146.
Buunk, B. P., Dijkstra, P., Fetchenhauer, D., & Kenrick, D. T. (2002). Age and gender differences in mate selection criteria for various involvement levels. Personal Relationships, 9, 271–278.
Clark, A. P. (2004). Self-perceived attractiveness and masculinisation predict women’s sociosexuality. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25(2), 113–124.
Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1991). The evolution of parental care. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Clutton-Brock, T. H., Hiraiwahasegawa, M., & Robertson, A. (1989). Mate choice on fallow deer leks. Nature, 340, 463–465.
Constanz, G. (1985). Alloparental care in the tessellated darter. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 14, 175–183.
Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London: Murray.
Digelidis, N., Papaioannou, A., Laparidis, K., & Christodoulidis, T. (2003). A one-year intervention in 7th grade physical education classes aiming to change motivational climate and attitudes towards exercise. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 4(3), 195–210.
Drullion, D., & Dubois, F. (2008). Mate-choice copying by female zebra finches, Taeniopygia guttata: what happens when model females provide inconsistent information? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 63, 269–276.
Dugatkin, L. A. (1992). Sexual selection and imitation: females copy the mate choice of others. The American Naturalist, 139(6), 1384–1389.
Dugatkin, L. A., & Godin, J. G. J. (1993). Female mate copying in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata): age-dependent effects. Behavioral Ecology, 4, 289–292.
Eva, K. W., & Wood, T. J. (2006). Are all the taken men good? An indirect examination of mate-choice copying in humans. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 175, 1573–1574.
Feingold, A. (1992). Gender differences in mate selection preferences: a test of the parental investment model. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 125–139.
Fischer, P., Schulz-Hardt, S., & Frey, D. (2008). Selective exposure and information quantity: how different information quantities moderate decision makers’ preference for consistent and inconsistent information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 231–244.
Funder, D. C., & Colvin, C. R. (1988). Friends and strangers: acquaintanceship, agreement, and the accuracy of personality judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 149–158.
Galef, B. G., & Laland, K. N. (2005). Social learning in animals: empirical studies and theoretical models. Bioscience, 55, 489–499.
Gibson, R. M., & Hoglund, J. (1992). Copying and sexual selection. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 7, 229–232.
Gibson, R. M., Bradbury, J. W., & Vehrencamp, S. L. (1991). Mate choice in lekking sage grouse revisited: The roles of vocal display, female site fidelity, and copying. Behavioral Ecology, 2, 165–180.
Gilovich, T., Keltner, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (2006). Social psychology. New York: Norton & Company.
Godin, J. G. J., Herdman, E. J. E., & Dugatkin, L. A. (2005). Social influences on female mate choice in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata: generalized and repeatable trait-copying behaviour. Animal Behaviour, 69, 999–1005.
Godoy, R., Eisenberg, D. T. A., Reyes-Garcia, V., Huanca, T., Leonard, W. R., McDade, T. W., et al. (2008). Assortative mating and offspring well-being: theory and empirical findings from a native Amazonian society in Bolivia. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 201–210.
Grundmann, R. (2009). The role of expertise in governance processes. Forest Policy and Economics, 11, 398–403.
Heine, J., Koch, S., & Goldie, P. (2004). Patients’ experiences of readiness for discharge following a total hip replacement. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 50, 227–233.
Hill, S. E., & Buss, D. M. (2008). The mere presence of opposite-sex others on judgments of sexual and romantic desirability: Opposite effects for men and women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 635–647.
Hodkinson, B. P., Swaddle, J. P., Cathey, M. G., & Correll, M. (2005). Socially transmitted mate preferences in a monogamous bird: a non-genetic mechanism of sexual selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of British Biological Sciences, 272, 1053–1058.
Hoglund, J., Alatalo, R. V., & Lundberg, A. (1990). Copying the mate choice of others? Observations of female black grouse. Behaviour, 114, 221–231.
Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., Sego, D. J., Hedlund, J., Major, D. A., & Phillips, J. (1995). Multilevel theory of team decision making: decision performance in teams incorporating distributed expertise. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 292–316.
Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Little, A. C., Burriss, R. P., & Feinberg, D. R. (2007). Social transmission of face preferences among humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society of British Biological Sciences, 274, 899–903.
Kenrick, D. T., & Keefe, R. C. (1992). Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in reproductive strategy. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 75–133.
Knapp, R. A., & Sargent, R. C. (1989). Egg-mimicry as a mating strategy in the fantail darter, Etheostoma flabellare: females prefer males with eggs. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 25, 321–326.
Lalumiere, M. L., & Quinsey, V. L. (1996). Sexual deviance, antisociality, mating effort, and the use of sexually coercive behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 33–48.
Lalumiere, M. L., Seto, M. C., & Quinsey, V. L. (1995). Self-perceived mating success and the mating choices of human males and females. Unpublished manuscript.
Lalumiere, M. L., Chalmers, L. J., Quinsey, V. L., & Seto, M. C. (1996). A test of the mate deprivation hypothesis of sexual coercion. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17, 299–318.
Landolt, M. A., Lalumiere, M. L., & Quinsey, V. L. (1995). Sex differences in intra-sex variations in human mating tactics: an evolutionary approach. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 3–23.
Lenton, A., Penke, L., Todd, P. M., & Fasolo, B. (1999). The heart does have its reasons: Social rationality in mate choice. In R. Hertwig, U. Hoffrage, & The ABC Research Group (Eds.), Social rationality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lucchetti, A. E. (1999). Deception in disclosing one’s sexual history: safe-sex avoidance or ignorance? Communication Quarterly, 47(3), 300–314.
Magnhagen, C. (1991). Predation risk as a cost of reproduction. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 6(6), 183–186.
Marconato, A., & Bisazza, A. (1986). Males whose nests contain eggs are preferred by female Cottus gobio L. (Pisces, Cottidae). Animal Behaviour, 34, 1580–1582.
Matsumoto, D., & Ekman, P. (1988). Japanese and Caucasian facial expressions of emotion (JACFEE) [Slides]. San Francisco: Intercultural and Emotion Research Laboratory, Department of Psychology, San Francisco State University.
Muir, E. H., & Ogden, J. (2001). Consultations involving people with congenital disabilities: factors that help or hinder giving care. Family Practice, 18(4), 419–424.
Place, S. S., Todd, P. M., Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2010). Humans show mate copying after observing real mate choices. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 320–325.
Pruett-Jones, S. (1992). Independent versus nonindependent mate choice: do females copy each other? The American Naturalist, 140, 1000–1009.
Pruett-Jones, S. G., & Pruett-Jones, M. A. (1990). Sexual selection through female choice in Lawes’ parotia, a lek-mating bird of paradise. Evolution, 44, 486–501.
Quinlan, R. J., & Quinlan, M. B. (2007). Evolutionary ecology of human pair-bonds. Cross-Cultural Research, 41(2), 149–169.
Real, L. (1990). Search theory and mate choice. I. Models of single-sex discrimination. American Naturalist, 136(3), 376–405.
Regan, P. C. (1998). What if you can’t get what you want? Willingness to compromise ideal mate selection standards as a function of sex, mate value, and relationship context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1294–1303.
Ridley, M., & Rechten, C. (1981). Female sticklebacks prefer to spawn with mates whose nests contain eggs. Behaviour, 16, 152–161.
Roberts, A. (2008). Drawing on expertise: legal decision-making and the reception of expert evidence. Criminal Law Review, 6, 443–462.
Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (2001). Human mate poaching: tactics and temptations for infiltrating existing mateships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 894–917.
Schulman, G. L., & Hoskins, M. (1986). Perceiving the male versus the female face. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 10(2), 141–154.
Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of waist-to-hip ratio and female physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 293–307.
Spence, A., & Townsend, E. (2007). Predicting behaviour towards genetically modified food using implicit and explicit attitudes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 65(2), 293–307.
Surbey, M. K., & Brice, G. R. (2007). Enhancement of self-perceived mate value precedes a shift in men’s preferred mating strategy. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 39(3), 513–522.
Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Taylor, S. E., Saphire-Bernstein, S., & Seeman, T. E. (2010). Are plasma oxytocin in women and plasma vasopressin in men biomarkers of distressed pair-bond relationships? Psychological Science, 21, 3–7.
Thiessen, D., & Gregg, B. (1980). Human assortative mating and genetic equilibrium: an evolutionary perspective. Ethology and Sociobiology, 1, 111–140.
Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1996). The evolution of human sexuality. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 11(2), 98–102.
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine.
Uller, T., & Johansson, L. C. (2003). Human mate choice and the wedding ring effect: are married men more attractive? Human Nature, 14, 267–276.
Unger, L. M., & Sargent, R. C. (1988). Allopaternal care in the fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas: females prefer males with eggs. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 23, 27–32.
Valone, T. J. (2007). From eavesdropping on performance to copying the behavior of others: a review of public information use. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 62, 1–14.
Voland, E., & Engel, C. (1990). Female choice in humans: a conditional mate selection strategy of the krummhorn women (Germany, 1720–1874). Ethology, 84(2), 144–154.
Waynforth, D. (2000). Mate choice trade-offs and women’s preference for physically attractive men. Human Nature, 12(3), 207–219.
Waynforth, D. (2007). Mate choice copying in humans. Human Nature, 18, 264–271.
White, D. J., & Galef, B. G. (2000). Differences between the sexes in direction and duration of response to seeing a potential sex partner mate with another. Animal Behaviour, 59, 1235–1240.
Witte, K., & Ryan, M. J. (2002). Mate choice copying in the sailfin molly, Poecilia latipinnia, in the wild. Animal Behaviour, 63(5), 943–949.
Acknowledgments
We thank each participant, without whom this work would not have been possible. This study was undertaken by the first author in partial fulfillment of the requirements of a B. Psych Honours degree. We thank the reviewers for their thoughtful suggestions on the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anderson, R.C., Surbey, M.K. I Want What She’s Having. Hum Nat 25, 342–358 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-014-9202-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-014-9202-7
Keywords
- Mate copying
- Women
- Mate selection
- Mate value
- Experience