Advertisement

Human Nature

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 251–268 | Cite as

Human Males Appear More Prepared Than Females to Resolve Conflicts with Same-Sex Peers

  • Joyce F. BenensonEmail author
  • Melissa N. Kuhn
  • Patrick J. Ryan
  • Anthony J. Ferranti
  • Rose Blondin
  • Michael Shea
  • Chalice Charpentier
  • Melissa Emery Thompson
  • Richard W. Wrangham
Article

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate sex differences in proximate mechanisms that precede the termination of conflicts. In Study 1, we asked women and men to report their intensity of anger in response to hypothetical, common transgressions involving a same-sex roommate. Direct verbal and physical aggression elicited the highest-intensity anger for both sexes, although overall women reported more intense anger than men to all transgressions. In Study 2, we examined sex differences in subjective and physiological reactions to a conflict using a role-playing scenario. Following recall of a conflict involving direct aggression and role-playing a reaction to it, compared with men, women reported their anger would dissipate less quickly and they would take longer to reconcile. Women also exhibited increased heart rate, but little change in cortisol, whereas men exhibited little change in heart rate but increased cortisol production. We interpret the results as indicating that women are less prepared than men to resolve a conflict with a same-sex peer.

Keywords

Conflict resolution Reconciliation Humans Sex differences Cortisol Heart rate Subjective anger 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Emmanuel College, Harvard University, and the University of New Mexico for support of this project.

References

  1. Archer, J. (2000). Sex Differences in Aggression Between Heterosexual Partners: A Meta-Analytic Review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(5), 651–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Archer, J. (2004). Sex Differences in Aggression in Real-World Settings: A Meta-Analytic Review. Review of General Psychology, 8(4), 291–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Archer, J. (2006). Cross-Cultural Differences in Physical Aggression Between Partners: A Social-Role Analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(2), 133–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aries, E. (1996). Men and women in interaction: Reconsidering the differences. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Benenson, J. F., & Alavi, K. (2004). Sex Differences in children’s Investment in Same-sex Peers. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25(4), 258–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benenson, J. F., & Christakos, A. (2003). The Greater Fragility of females’ Versus males’ Closest Same-sex Friendships. Child Development, 74(4), 1123–1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benenson, J., Saelen, C., Markovits, H., & McCabe, S. (2008). Males Derive Greater Benefits Than Females do from Same-sex Peers Relative to Parents. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Benenson, J. F., Markovits, H., Fitzgerald, C., Geoffroy, D., Flemming, J., Kahlenberg, S. M., et al. (2009). Males’ Greater Tolerance of Same-sex Peers. Psychological Science, 20(2), 184–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Benenson, J., Markovits, H., Hultgren, B., Nyugen, T., Bullock, G., & Wrangham, R. W. (2013). Females More Than Males Engage in Social Exclusion. PloS One, 8(2), e55851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blackhart, G. C., Nelson, B. C., Knowles, M. L., & Baumeister, R. F. (2009). Rejection Elicits Emotional Reactions but Neither Causes Immediate Distress nor Lowers Self-Esteem: A Meta-Analytic Review of 192 Studies on Social Exclusion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(4), 269–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bowles, S. (2009). Did Warfare Among Ancestral Hunter-Gatherers Affect the Evolution of Human Social Behaviors? Science, 324(5932), 1293–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Butovskaya, M. L. (2008). Reconciliation, Dominance and Cortisol Levels in Children and Adolescents (7–15 Year-old Boys). Behaviour, 145(11), 1557–1576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Butovskaya, M. L., & Kozinstev, A. (1999). Aggression, Friendship, and Reconciliation in Russian Primary Schoolchildren. Aggressive Behavior, 25, 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Butovskaya, M. L., Boyko, E. Y., Selverova, N. B., & Ermakova, I. V. (2005). The Hormonal Basis of Reconciliation in Humans. Journal of Physiological Anthropology and Applied Human Science, 24(4), 333–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Butovskaya, M. L., Timentschik, V., & Burkova, V. N. (2007). Aggression, Conflict Resolution, Popularity, and Attitude to School in Russian Adolescents. Aggressive Behavior, 33, 170–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Campbell, A. (2008). Attachment, Aggression and Affiliation: The Role of Oxytocin in Female Social Behavior. Biological Psychology, 77, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Campbell, A., & Muncer, S. (2008). Intent to Harm or Injure? Gender and the Expression of Anger. Aggressive Behavior, 34(3), 282–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cisek, P., & Kalaska, J. F. (2004). Neural Correlates Ofmental Rehearsal in Dorsal Premotor Cortext. Nature, 431, 993–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. de Waal, F. B. M. (1986). The Integration of Dominance and Social Bonding in Primates. Quarterly Review of Biology, 61, 459–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. de Waal, F. B. M. (1989). Peacemaking among primates. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. de Waal, F. B. M., & van Roosmalen, A. (1979). Reconciliation and Consolation Among Chimpanzees. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 5(1), 55–66.Google Scholar
  22. Dickerson, S. S., & Kemeny, M. E. (2004). Acute Stressors and Cortisol Responses: A Theoretical Integration and Synthesis of Laboratory Research. Psychological Bulletin, 130(3), 355–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ekman, P., Levenson, R. W., & Friesen, W. V. (1983). Autonomic Nervous System Activity Distinguishes Among Emotions. Science, 221(4616), 1208–1210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fernández, C., Pascual, J. C., Soler, J., Elices, M., Portella, M. J., & Fernández-Abascal, E. (2012). Physiological Responses Induced by Emotion-Eliciting Films. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 37, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fine, G. A. (1980). The natural history of preadolescent male friendship groups. In H. C. Foot, A. J. Chapman, & J. R. Smith (Eds.), Friendship and social relations in children (pp. 293–320). Piscataway: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  26. Flinn, M. V., Ponzi, D., & Muehlenbein, M. P. (2012). Hormonal Mechanisms for Regulation of Aggression in Human Coalitions. Human Nature, 23, 68–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fraser, O. N., Stahl, D., & Aureli, F. (2008). Stress Reduction Through Consolation in Chimpanzees. Proceedings of the National Academcy of Sciences, 105(25), 8557–8562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Furuichi, T. (2011). Contribution of Female Bonobos to the Peaceful Nature of the Society. Evolutionary Anthropology, 20, 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gabriel, S., & Gardner, W. L. (1999). Are There“his” and“ Hers” Types of Interdependence? The Implications of Gender Differences in Collective Versus Relational Interdependence for Affect, Behavior, and Cognition. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 77(3), 642–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Goodall, J. (1986). The chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of behavior. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Hohmann, G., & Fruth, B. (2000). Use and Function of Genital Contacts Among Female Bonobos. Animal Behaviour, 60(1), 107–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jamieson, J. P., Koslov, K., Nock, M. K., & Mendes, W. B. (2013). Experiencing Discrimination Increases Risk Taking. Psychological Science, 24, 131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kirschbaum, C., Kudielka, B., Gaab, J., Schommer, N. C., & Hellhammer, D. H. (1999). Impact of Gender, Menstrual Cycle Phase, and Oral Contraceptives on the Activity of the Hypothalamus-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis. Psychosomatic Medicine, 51, 154–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kon, I. S., & Losenkov, V. A. (1978). Friendship in Adolescence: Values and Behavior. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 40, 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kudielka, B. M., & Kirschbaum, C. (2005). Sex Differences in HPA Axis Responses to Stress: A Review. Biological Psychology, 69(1), 113–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kudielka, B. M., Buske-Kirschbaum, A., Hellhammer, D. H., & Kirschbaum, C. (2004). HPA Axis Responses to Laboratory Psychosocial Stress in Healthy Elderly Adults, Younger Adults, and Children: Impact of age and Gender. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 29(1), 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Langergraber, K., Mitani, J., & Vigilant, L. (2009). Kinship and Social Bonds in Female Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). American Journal of Primatology, 71(10), 840–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lehmann, J., & Boesch, C. (2009). Sociality of the Dispersing sex: The Nature of Social Bonds in West African Female Chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes. Animal Behavior, 77(2), 377–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lever, J. (1978). Sex Differences in the Complexity of children’s Play and Games. American Sociological Review, 43(4), 471–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. MacEvoy, J. P., & Asher, S. R. (2012). When Friends Disappoint: Boys’ and girls’ Responses to Transgressions of Friendship Expectations. Child Development, 83, 104–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Markovits, H., Benenson, J., & Dolenszky, E. (2001). Evidence That Children and Adolescents Have Internal Models of Peer Interactions That are Gender Differentiated. Child Development, 72(3), 879–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Palagi, E., Paoli, T., & Tarli, S. B. (2004). Reconciliation and Consolation in Captive Bonobos (Pan paniscus). American Journal of Primatology, 62(1), 15–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Porges, S. W. (2011). The polyvagal theory: Neurophysiological foundations of emotions, attachment, communication, and self-regulation. New York: WW Norton.Google Scholar
  44. Romero, T., Castellanos, M. A., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2010). Consolation as Possible Expression of Sympathy Among Chimpanzees. Proccedings of the National Academcy of Sciences, 107, 12110–12115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sapolsky, R. M., Romero, L. M., & Munck, A. U. (2000). How do Glucocorticoids Influence Stress Responses? Integrating Permissive, Suppressive, Stimulatory, and Preparative Actions. Endocrine Reviews, 21, 55–89.Google Scholar
  46. Savin-Williams, R. C. (1980). Social interactions of adolescent females in natural groups. In H. C. Foot, A. J. Chapman, & J. R. Smith (Eds.), Friendship and social relations in children (pp. 343–363). New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
  47. Schlegel, A., & Barry, H. (1991). Adolescence. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  48. Schumann, K., & Ross, M. (2010). Why Women Apologize More Than men. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1649–1655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sell, A. N. (2011). The Recalibrational Theory and Violent Anger. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16, 381–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sell, A. N., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2009). Formidability and the Logic of Human Anger. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 15073–15078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stroud, L. R., Salovey, P., & Epel, E. S. (2002). Sex Differences in Stress Responses: Social Rejection Versus Achievement Stress. Biological Psychiatry, 52(4), 318–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Taylor, S. E., Klein, L. C., Lewis, B. P., Gruenewald, T. L., Gurung, R. A. R., & Updegraff, J. A. (2000). Biobehavioral Responses to Stress in Females: Tend-and-Befriend, not Fight-or-Flight. Psychological Review, 107(3), 411–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tiger, L. (1969). Men in groups. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  54. Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  55. Watts, D. P. (2006). Conflict Resolution in Chimpanzees and the Valuable-Relationships Hypothesis. International Journal of Primatology, 27(5), 1337–1364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Whitesell, N. R., & Harter, S. (1996). The Interpersonal Context of Emotion: Anger With Close Friends and Classmates. Child Development, 67(4), 1345–1359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Winstead, B., & Griffin, J. (2001). Friendship styles. In J. Worell (Ed.), Encyclopedia of women and gender (pp. 481–492). Boston: Academic.Google Scholar
  58. Wittig, R. M., & Boesch, C. (2003). The Choice of Post-Conflict Interactions in Wild Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Behaviour, 140, 1527–1559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wrangham, R. W. (1999). Evolution of Coalitionary Killing. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 29(42), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wrangham, R. W. (2000). Why are male chimpanzees more gregarious than mothers? A scramble competition hypothesis. In P. M. Kappeler (Ed.), Primate males (pp. 248–258). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joyce F. Benenson
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Melissa N. Kuhn
    • 1
  • Patrick J. Ryan
    • 1
  • Anthony J. Ferranti
    • 1
  • Rose Blondin
    • 1
  • Michael Shea
    • 1
  • Chalice Charpentier
    • 1
  • Melissa Emery Thompson
    • 2
    • 3
  • Richard W. Wrangham
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyEmmanuel CollegeBostonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Human Evolutionary BiologyHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA
  3. 3.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations