The Primary Parental Investment in Children in the Contemporary USA is Education

Testing the Trivers-Willard Hypothesis of Parental Investment

Abstract

This paper tests the Trivers-Willard hypothesis that high-status individuals will invest more in sons and low-status individuals will invest more in daughters using data from the 2000 to 2010 General Social Survey and the 1979 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. We argue that the primary investment U.S. parents make in their children is in their children’s education, and this investment is facilitated by a diverse market of educational choices at every educational level. We examine two measures of this investment: children’s years of education and the highest degree attained. Results show that sons of high-status fathers receive more years of education and higher degrees than daughters, whereas daughters of low-status fathers receive more years of education and higher degrees than sons. Further analyses of possible mechanisms for these findings yield null results. We also find that males are more likely to have high-status fathers than females.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Almond, D., & Edlund, L. (2007). Trivers–Willard at birth and one year: evidence from US natality data 1983-2001. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 274, 2491–2496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barthold, J. A., Myrskylä, M., & Jones, O. R. (2012). Childlessness drives the sex difference in the association between income and reproductive success of modern Europeans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 628–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Beaulieu, D. A., & Bugental, D. (2008). Contingent parental investment: an evolutionary framework for understanding early interaction between mothers and children. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(4), 249–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Betzig, L. (2012). Means, variances, and ranges in reproductive success: comparative evidence. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(4), 309–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Blau, P. M., & Duncan, O. D. In collaboration with Andrea Tyree. (1967). The American occupational structure. New York: Wiley.

  6. Cameron, E. Z., Dalerum, F., & Reby, D. (2009). A Trivers-Willard effect in contemporary humans: male-biased sex ratios among billionaires. PloS ONE, 4(1), e4195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Catalano, R. A. (2003). Sex ratios in the two Germanies: a test of the economic stress hypothesis. Human Reproduction, 18(9), 1972–1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Catalano, R. A., & Bruckner, T. (2005). Economic antecedents of the Swedish sex ratio. Social Science & Medicine, 60, 537–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cox, D. (2003). Private transfers within the family: Mothers, fathers, sons, and daughters. In A. Munnell & A. Sundén (Eds.), Death and dollars: The role of gifts and bequests in America (pp. 168–217). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cronk, L. (2007). Boy or girl: gender preferences from a Darwinian point of view. Ethics, Bioscience, and Life, 2(3), 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Davis, J. A., & Smith, T. W. (1998). General social surveys 1972–1998. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center, producer; Storrs, CT: The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut, distributor.

  12. Downey, D. B. (1995). When bigger is not better: family size, parental resources, and children’s educational performance. American Sociological Review, 60, 746–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fieder, M., & Huber, S. (2007). The effects of sex and childlessness on the association between status and reproductive output in modern society. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 392–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Freese, J., & Powell, B. (1999). Sociobiology, status and parental investment in sons and daughters: testing the Trivers-Willard hypothesis. American Journal of Sociology, 104(6), 1704–1743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fukuda, M., Fukuda, K., Shimizu, T., & Møller, H. (1998). Decline in sex ratio at birth after Kobe earthquake. Human Reproduction, 13(8), 2321–2322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Goldin, C., Katz, L. F., & Kuziemko, I. (2006). The homecoming of American College Women: the reversal of the college gender gap. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(4), 133–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Greene, W. H. (2000). Econometric analysis (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hansen, D., Møller, H., & Olsen, J. (1999). Severe periconceptional life events and the sex ratio in offspring: follow-up study based on five national registers. British Medical Journal, 28(319), 548–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hopcroft, R. L. (2005). Parental status and differential investment in sons and daughters: Trivers-Willard revisited. Social Forces, 83(3), 1111–1136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hout, M. (2012). Social and economic returns to college education in the United States. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 379–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Julian, T. A., & Kominski, R. A. (2011). Education and synthetic work-life earnings estimates. American community survey reports, ACS-14. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kalmijn, M. (1998). Homogamy: causes, patterns, trends. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Keller, M. C., Nesse, R. M., & Hofferth, S. (2001). The Trivers-Willard hypothesis of parental investment. no effect in the contemporary United States. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 343–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kerckhoff, A. C. (1995). Institutional arrangements and stratification processes in industrial societies. Annual Review of Sociology, 21, 323–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Khashan, A. S., Mortensen, P. B., McNamee, R., Baker, P. N., & Abel, K. M. (2009). Sex ratio at birth following prenatal maternal exposure to severe life events: a population-based cohort study. Human Reproduction, 24(7), 1754–1757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lazarus, J. (2002). Human sex ratios: Adaptations and mechanisms, problems and prospects. In I. C. W. Hardy (Ed.), Sex ratios: Concepts and research methods (pp. 287–311). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Nettle, D. (2010). Dying young and living fast: variation in life history across English neighborhoods. Behavioral Ecology, 21(2), 387–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nettle, D., & Pollet, T. V. (2008). Natural selection on male wealth in humans. American Naturalist, 172(5), 658–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Oppenheimer, V. K. (2000). The continuing importance of men’s economic position in marriage formation. In L. Waite, C. Bachrach, M. Hindin, E. Thomson, & A. Thornton (Eds.), Ties that bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation (pp. 283–301). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.

  30. Schnettler, S. (2011). Nature plus nurture equals love? A test of the Trivers-Willard hypothesis of differential parental investment on the basis of sociological and biological explanations. Dissertation Abstracts International, A: The Humanities and Social Sciences, 71(8), 3069.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Schwartz, C. R. (2010). Pathways to educational homogamy in marital and cohabiting unions. Demography, 47(3), 735–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Steelman, L. C., & Powell, B. (1989). Acquiring capital for college: the constraints of family configuration. American Sociological Review, 54(5), 844–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Subbaraman, M., Goldman-Mellor, S., Anderson, E., LeWinn, K., Saxton, L., & Shumway, M. (2010). An exploration of secondary sex ratios among women diagnosed with anxiety disorders. Human Reproduction, 25, 2084–2091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Torche, F., & Kleinhaus, K. (2012). Prenatal stress, gestational age and secondary sex ratio: the sex-specific effects of exposure to a natural disaster in early pregnancy. Human Reproduction, 27(2), 558–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Trivers, R. L., & Willard, D. E. (1973). Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science, 179(4068), 90–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2012). Employment and earnings online, data available from http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat22.htm. Accessed 2/14/2014.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the helpful comments of Joseph Whitmeyer, Yang Cao, Daniel Nettle and Lee Cronk on previous drafts of this paper

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosemary L. Hopcroft.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 9 Correlations, all variables (GSS)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hopcroft, R.L., Martin, D.O. The Primary Parental Investment in Children in the Contemporary USA is Education. Hum Nat 25, 235–250 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-014-9197-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Trivers-Willard
  • Parental investment
  • Education
  • Biosocial