Skip to main content

How Do Rituals Affect Cooperation?

An Experimental Field Study Comparing Nine Ritual Types

Abstract

Collective rituals have long puzzled anthropologists, yet little is known about how rituals affect participants. Our study investigated the effects of nine naturally occurring rituals on prosociality. We operationalized prosociality as (1) attitudes about fellow ritual participants and (2) decisions in a public goods game. The nine rituals varied in levels of synchrony and levels of sacred attribution. We found that rituals with synchronous body movements were more likely to enhance prosocial attitudes. We also found that rituals judged to be sacred were associated with the largest contributions in the public goods game. Path analysis favored a model in which sacred values mediate the effects of synchronous movements on prosocial behaviors. Our analysis offers the first quantitative evidence for the long-standing anthropological conjecture that rituals orchestrate body motions and sacred values to support prosociality. Our analysis, moreover, adds precision to this old conjecture with evidence of a specific mechanism: ritual synchrony increases perceptions of oneness with others, which increases sacred values to intensify prosocial behaviors.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aron, A., Aron, E., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atran, S. (2002). In Gods we trust: The evolutionary landscape of religion. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atran, S., Axelrod, R., & Davis, R. (2007). Sacred barriers to conflict resolution. Science, 317, 1039–1140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvard, M. S., & Nolin, D. A. (2002). Rousseau’s whale hunt? Coordination among big-game hunters. Current Anthropology, 43(4), 533–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulbulia, J. (2012). Spreading order: religion, cooperative niche construction, and risky coordination problems. Biology and Philosophy, 27(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science, 3, 14–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denson, T. F., Lickel, B., Curtis, M., Stenstrom, D. M., & Ames, D. R. (2006). The roles of entitativity and essentiality in judgments of collective responsibility. Group Processes Intergroup Relations., 9(43), 41–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1995). The elementary forms of the religious life. New York: Free Press. Originally published in 1912.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenreich, B. (2006). Dancing in the Streets. New York: Metropolitan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetterman, D. M. (1998). Ethnography (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginges, J., Hansen, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2009). Religion and support for suicide attacks. Psychological Science, 20(2), 224–230. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02270.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J., Patrick Seder, J., & Kesebir, S. (2008). Hive psychology, happiness, and public policy. The Journal of Legal Studies, 37, S153–S156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, E., & Bryant, G. (2003). Music and dance as a coalition signaling system. Human Nature, 14(1), 21–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hove, M., & Risen, J. (2009). It’s all in the timing: interpersonal synchrony increases affiliation. Social Cognition, 27(6), 949–960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irons, W. (2001). Religion as hard-to-fake sign of commitment (pp. 292–309). New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvenpaa, S., Knoll, K., & Leidner, D. (1998). Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14, 29–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konvalinka, I., Xygalatas, D., Bulbulia, J., Schjodt, U., Jegindo, E. M., Wallot, S., et al. (2011). Synchronized arousal between performers and related spectators in a fire-walking ritual. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(20), 8514–8519. doi:10.1073/pnas.1016955108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakens, D. (2010). Movement synchrony and perceived entitativity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 701–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitin, D. J. (2008). The world in six songs: How the musical brain created human nature. New York: Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lickel, B., Hamilton, D. L., Wieczorkowska, G., Lewis, A., Sherman, S. J., & Uhles, N. (2000). Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 223–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, W. H. (1995). Keeping together in time: Dance and drill in human history. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, L. K., Nind, L. K., & Macrae, C. N. (2009). The rhythm of rapport: interpersonal synchrony and social perception. Cognition, 190, 585–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. (1998–2010). Mplus Users Guide, version 6. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.

  • Pearce, J. L., Branyiczki, I., & Bakacsi, G. (1994). Person-based reward systems: a theory of organizational reward practices in reform-communist organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 261–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (1922). The andaman islanders. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddish, P., Bulbulia, J., & Fischer, R. (2013). Does synchrony promote generalized prosociality? Religion, Brain and Behavior Science.. doi:10.1080/2153599X.2013.764545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T. (2006). Micromotives and Macrobehavior (Kindle edition). New York: W. W. Norton. Originally published in 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skitka, L. J. (2010). The psychology of moral conviction. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 267–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosis, R. (2003). Why aren’t we all Hutterites? Human Nature, 14(2), 91–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosis, R., & Ruffle, B. (2004). Religious ritual and cooperation: testing for a relationship on Israeli Religious and Secular Kibbutzim. Current Anthropology, 44(5), 713–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, C., Ryf, B., & Hanselmann, M. (2009). Geschuetzte Werte Skala (GWS): Konstruktion und Validierung eines Messinstrumentes (Sacred value scale: construction and validation of a measurement scale). Diagnostica, 55, 174–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tetlock, P. E. (2003). Thinking the unthinkable: sacred values and taboo cognitions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 320–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valdesolo, P., & DeSteno, D. (2011). Synchrony and the social tuning of compassion. Emotion, 11, 262–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Baaren, R. B., Holland, R. W., & Kawakami, K. (2004). Mimicry and prosocial behavior. Psychological Science, 15(1), 71–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Baaren, R. B., Holland, R. W., & Steenaert, B. (2003). Mimicry for money: behavioral consequences of imitation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(4), 393–398. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00014-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse, H. (2004). Modes of religiosity: A cognitive theory of religious transmission. Lanham: AltaMira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiltermuth, S. S., & Heath, C. (2009). Synchrony and cooperation. Psychological Science, 20(1), 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Diana Boer for her helpful comments. We are grateful to the editor of Human Nature, Jane Lancaster, and to four anonymous referees for their helpful comments and encouragement. For financial support, we are grateful to a Victoria University URF Grant 8-3046-108855.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph Bulbulia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fischer, R., Callander, R., Reddish, P. et al. How Do Rituals Affect Cooperation?. Hum Nat 24, 115–125 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-013-9167-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-013-9167-y

Keywords