Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Watching the Hourglass

Eye Tracking Reveals Men’s Appreciation of the Female Form

  • Published:
Human Nature Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Eye-tracking techniques were used to measure men’s attention to back-posed and front-posed images of women varying in waist-to-hip ratio (WHR). Irrespective of body pose, men rated images with a 0.7 WHR as most attractive. For back-posed images, initial visual fixations (occurring within 200 milliseconds of commencement of the eye-tracking session) most frequently involved the midriff. Numbers of fixations and dwell times throughout each of the five-second viewing sessions were greatest for the midriff and buttocks. By contrast, visual attention to front-posed images (first fixations, numbers of fixations, and dwell times) mainly involved the breasts, with attention shifting more to the midriff of images with a higher WHR. This report is the first to compare men’s eye-tracking responses to back-posed and front-posed images of the female body. Results show the importance of the female midriff and of WHR upon men’s attractiveness judgments, especially when viewing back-posed images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Björntorp, P. (1997). Body fat distribution, insulin resistance and metabolic disease. Nutrition, 13, 795–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavior and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (2003). The evolution of desire (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, L. E. J., & Heath, B. H. (1990). Somatotyping: Development and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castellanos, E. H., Charboneau, E., Dietrich, M. S., Park, S., Bradley, P., Mogg, K., et al. (2009). Obese adults have visual attentional bias for food cue images: evidence for altered reward system function. International Journal of Obesity, 33, 1063–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarys, J. P., Martin, A. D., & Drinkwater, D. T. (1984). Gross tissue weights in the human body by cadaver dissection. Human Biology, 56, 459–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelissen, P. L., Hancock, P. J. B., Kiviniemi, V., George, H. R., & Tovée, M. J. (2009). Patterns of eye movements when male and female observers judge female attractiveness, body fat and waist-to-hip ratio. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 417–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Martino, B., Kalisch, R., Rees, G., & Dolan, R. J. (2009). Enhanced processing of threat stimuli under limited attentional resources. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 127–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, B. J., Dixson, A. F., Li, B., & Anderson, M. J. (2007a). Studies of human physique and sexual attractiveness: sexual preferences of men and women in China. American Journal of Human Biology, 19, 88–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, B. J., Dixson, A. F., Morgan, B., & Anderson, M. J. (2007b). Human physique and sexual attractiveness: sexual preferences of men and women in Bakossiland, Cameroon. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 369–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, B. J., Grimshaw, G, M., Linklater, W. L., & Dixson, A. F. (2009). Eye tracking of men’s preferences for waist-to-hip ratio and breast size of women. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9523-5.

  • Dixson, B. J., Dixson, A. F., Bishop, P., & Parish, A. (2010a). Human physique and sexual attractiveness in men and women: a New Zealand—U.S.A comparative study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 798–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, B. J., Li, B., & Dixson, A. F. (2010b). Female waist-to-hip ratio, body mass index and sexual attractiveness in China. Current Zoology, 56, 175–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, B. J., Sagata, K., Linklater, W. L., & Dixson, A. F. (2010c). Male preferences for waist to-hip ratio and body mass index in the highlands of Papua New Guinea. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 141, 620–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufour, D. L., & Slather, M. L. (2002). Comparative and evolutionary dimensions of the energetics of human pregnancy and lactation. American Journal of Human Biology, 14, 584–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fink, B., Matts, P. J., Klingenberg, H., Kuntze, S., Bettina, W., & Grammer, K. (2008). Visual attention to variation in facial skin color distribution. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 7, 155–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., Tan, T., & McManus, C. (1997). Waist-to-hip ratio and preferences for body shape: a replication and extension. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 540–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grammer, K., Fink, B., Møller, A. P., & Thornhill, R. (2003). Darwinian aesthetics: sexual selection and the biology of beauty. Biological Reviews, 78, 385–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henss, R. (2000). Waist-to-hip ratio and female attractiveness: evidence from photographic stimuli and methodological considerations. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 501–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewig, J., Trippe, R. H., Hecht, H., Straube, T., & Miltner, W. H. R. (2008). Gender differences for specific body regions when looking at men and women. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 32, 67–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasienska, G., Ziomkiewicz, A., Ellison, P. T., Lipson, S. F., & Thune, I. (2004). Large breasts and narrow waists indicate high reproductive potential in women. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, 271, 1213–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, M. A., & Samojlik, E. (1991). Sex hormone metabolism in upper and lower body obesity. International Journal of Obesity, 15, 101–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, J. H., Roggman, L. A., Casey, R. J., Ritter, J. M., Rieser-Danner, L. A., & Jenkins, V. Y. (1987). Infant preferences for attractive faces: rudiments of a stereotype? Developmental Psychology, 23, 363–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lassek, W. D., & Gaulin, S. J. C. (2007). Menarche is related to fat distribution. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 133, 1147–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipson, S. F., & Ellison, P. T. (1996). Comparison of salivary steroid profiles in naturally occurring conception and non-conception cycles. Human Reproduction, 11, 2090–2096.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lykins, A. D., Meana, M., & Kambe, G. (2006). Detection of differential viewing patterns to erotic and non-erotic stimuli using eye-tracking methodology. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 569–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lykins, A. D., Meana, M., & Strauss, G. P. (2008). Sex differences in visual attention to erotic and non-erotic visual stimuli. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 219–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maner, J. K., Gailliot, M. T., & DeWall, C. N. (2007). Adaptive attentional attunement: evidence for mating-related perceptual bias. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 28–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maner, J. K., DeWall, C. N., & Gailliot, M. T. (2008). Selective attention to signs of success: social dominance and early stage interpersonal perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 488–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marlowe, F., Apicella, C. L., & Reed, D. (2005). Men’s preferences for women’s profile waist-to-hip ratio in two societies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 371–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, C., Hernandez, E., Ruiz, I. E., Fonseca, M. E., Bermudez, J. A., & Zarate, A. (1999). Upper body obesity and hyperinsulinemia are associated with anovulation. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, 47, 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platek, S. M., & Singh, D. (2010). Optimal waist-to-hip ratios in women activate neural reward centers in men. PLoS ONE, 5, e9042. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, J. E., & O’Brien, L. (2009). Selective visual attention and motivation: the consequences of value learning in an attentional blink task. Psychological Science, 20, 981–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozmus-Wrzesinska, M., & Pawlowski, B. (2005). Men’s ratings of female attractiveness are influenced more by changes in female waist size compared with changes in hip size. Biological Psychology, 68, 299–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupp, H. A., & Wallen, K. (2007). Sex differences in viewing sexual stimuli: an eye tracking study of men and women. Hormones and Behavior, 51, 524–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruz, M., & Lupiáñez, J. (2002). A review of attentional capture: on its automaticity and sensitivity to endogenous control. Psicológica, 23, 283–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimojo, S., Simion, C., Shimojo, & Scheier, S. (2003). Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 1317–1322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simblet, S. (2001). Anatomy for the artist. New York: DK Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 293–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D., & Randall, P. (2007). Beauty is in the eye of the plastic surgeon: waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) and women’s attractiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 329–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D., Dixson, B. J., Jessop, T., Morgan, B., & Dixson, A. F. (2010). Cross-cultural consensus for waist-to-hip ratio and women’s attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior., 31, 176–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugiyama, L. S. (2004). Is beauty in the context-sensitive adaptations of the beholder? Shiwiar use of waist-to-hip ratio in assessments of female mate value. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 51–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suschinsky, K. D., Elias, L. J., & Krupp, D. B. (2007). Looking for Ms Right: allocating attention to facilitate mate choice decisions. Evolutionary Psychology, 5, 428–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sütterlin, B., Brunner, T. A., & Opwis, K. (2008). Eye-tracking the cancellation and focus model for preference judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 904–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swami, V., & Tovée, M. J. (2005). Female physical attractiveness in Britain and Malaysia: a cross-cultural study. Body Image, 2, 115–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swami, V., Caprario, C., Tovée, M. J., & Furnham, A. (2006). Female physical attractiveness in Britain and Japan: a cross-cultural study. European Journal of Personality, 20, 69–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tovée, M. J., & Cornelissen, P. L. (2001). Female and male perceptions of female physical attractiveness in front-view and profile. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 391–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tovée, M. J., Swami, V., Furnham, A., & Mangalparsad, R. (2006). Changing perceptions of attractiveness as observers are exposed to a different culture. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 443–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hooff, M. H. A., Voorhorst, F. J., Kaptein, M. B., Hirasing, R. A., Koppenaal, C., & Schoemaker, J. (2000). Insulin, androgen, and gonadotropin concentrations, body mass index, and waist-to-hip ratio in the first years after menarche in girls with regular menstrual cycles, irregular menstrual cycles, or oligomenorrhea. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 85, 1394–1400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wass, P., Waldenstrom, U., Rossner, S., & Hellberg, D. (1997). An android body fat distribution in females impairs pregnancy rate of in-vitro fertilization—embryo transfer. Human Reproduction, 12, 2057–2060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, J. C. K. (2007). Sexual dimorphism of body composition. Best Practice and Research: Endocrinology and Metabolism, 21, 415–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetsman, A., & Marlowe, F. (1999). How universal are preferences for female waist-to-hip ratios? Evidence from the Hadza of Tanzania. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 219–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, D. W., & Shepard, G. H. (1998). Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Nature, 396, 321–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaadstra, B. M., Seidell, J., Van Noord, P. A., te Velde, E. R., Habbema, J. D., Vrieswijk, B., et al. (1993). Fat and female fecundity: prospective study of body fat distribution in conception rates. British Medical Journal, 306, 484–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Linklater lab group for providing helpful feedback on an earlier draft of the manuscript. We also thank five anonymous reviewers for helpful and detailed comments on the manuscript. B. J. Dixson was funded by an Education New Zealand International Doctoral Scholarship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, 6140, New Zealand

    Barnaby J. Dixson, Wayne L. Linklater & Alan F. Dixson

  2. School of Psychology, Victoria University, Wellington, New Zealand

    Gina M. Grimshaw

Authors
  1. Barnaby J. Dixson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gina M. Grimshaw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wayne L. Linklater
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alan F. Dixson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barnaby J. Dixson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dixson, B.J., Grimshaw, G.M., Linklater, W.L. et al. Watching the Hourglass. Hum Nat 21, 355–370 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-010-9100-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-010-9100-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation