Androphilia refers to sexual attraction and arousal to adult males, whereas gynephilia refers to sexual attraction and arousal to adult females. In Independent Samoa, androphilic males, most of whom are effeminate or transgendered, are referred to as fa’afafine, which means “in the manner of a woman.” Previous research has established that fa’afafine report significantly higher avuncular tendencies relative to gynephilic men. We hypothesized that Samoan fa’afafine might adopt feminine gender role orientations with respect to childcare activity. If so, then the fa’afafine’s femininity might be a proximate mechanism for promoting their elevated avuncular tendencies. Our analyses indicated that fa’afafine had significantly higher willingness to assist in the childcare of nieces and nephews than childless women, mothers, or men, none of whom differed from each other on this measure. Thus, femininity does not appear to explain the fa’afafine’s pattern of avuncular tendencies, nor the women’s pattern of materteral (i.e., aunt-like) tendencies, relative to gynephilic men. We discuss how the fa’afafine “third” gender status might influence the expression of their elevated avuncular tendencies.
This is a preview of subscription content,to check access.
Access this article
Similar content being viewed by others
Fales are traditional, open, one-room dwellings (oval, round, or rectangular) with thatched or corrugated tin roofs supported by wood pillars. Fale floors are made of stones (which are then covered with woven mats), wood, or cement (Lal and Fortune 2000). Front gardens are ornamental gardens that are positioned in front of dwellings (Kitts 2006). These gardens are unique and salient features of Samoan homes and villages.
Bailey, J. M., Dunne, M. P., & Martin, N. G. (2000). Genetics and environmental influences on sexual orientation and its correlates in an Australian twin sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 524–536.
Bartlett, N. H., & Vasey, P. L. (2006). A retrospective study of childhood gender: atypical behavior in Samoan fa’afafine. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 559–566.
Bell, A. P., & Weinberg, M. S. (1978). Homosexualities: A study of diversity among men and women. New York: Simon and Shuster.
Bobrow, D., & Bailey, J. M. (2001). Is male homosexuality maintained via kin selection? Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 361–368.
Brooks, P., & Bocahut, L., directors. (1998). Woubi cheri [motion picture]. San Francisco: California Newsreel.
Chiñas, B. (1995). Isthmus Zapotec attitudes toward sex and gender anomalies. In S. O. Murray (Ed.), Latin American male homosexualities (pp. 293–302). Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
Chung, Y. B., & Harmon, L. W. (1994). The career interests and aspirations of gay men: how sex-role orientation is related. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 223–239.
Cialdini, R. B., Kallgren, C. A., & Reno, R. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human conduct. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), The development of prosocial behavior (pp. 339–359). New York: Academic.
Colker, R., & Widom, C. (1980). Correlates of female athletic participation: masculinity, femininity, self-esteem, and attitudes toward women. Sex Roles, 6, 47–59.
Croall, H., & Wunderman, E., directors. (1999). Paradise bent: Gender diversity in Samoa [motion picture]. New York: Filmakers Library.
Danielsson, B., Danielsson, T., & Pierson, R. (1978). Polynesia’s third sex: the gay life starts in the kitchen. Pacific Islands Monthly, 49, 10–13.
Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Essock-Vitale, S. M., & McGuire, M. T. (1985). Women’s lives viewed from an evolutionary perspective, II: patterns of helping. Ethology and Sociobiology, 6, 155–173.
Etaugh, C., & Poertner, P. (1991). Effects of occupational prestige, employment status, and mental status on perceptions of mothers. Sex Roles, 26, 311–321.
Etaugh, C., & Poertner, P. (1992). Perceptions of women: influence of performance, marital, and parental variables. Sex Roles, 24, 345–353.
Freeman, D. (1983). Margaret Mead and Samoa: The making and unmaking of an anthropological myth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Haldane, J. B. S. (1955). Population genetics. New Biology, 18, 34–51.
Hamer, D., & Copeland, P. (1994). The science of desire: The search for the gay gene and the biology of behavior. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Hamilton, W. D. (1963). The evolution of altruistic behavior. American Naturalist, 97, 354–356.
Harrison, L. A., & Lynch, A. B. (2005). Social role theory and the perceived gender role orientation of athletes. Sex Roles, 52, 227–236.
Holmes, L. D. (1987). Quest for the real Samoa: The Mead/Freeman controversy and beyond. South Hadley: Bergin and Garvey.
Iemmola, F., & Camperio Ciani, A. (2008). New evidence of genetic factors influencing sexual orienation in men: female fecundity increases in the maternal line. Archives of Sexual Behaviour, doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9381-6.
Kendler, K. S., Thornton, L. M., Gilman, S. E., & Kessler, R. C. (2000). Sexual orientation in a US national sample of twin and non-twin sibling pairs. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 1843–1846.
Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia: Saunders.
Kitts, S. (2006). Front gardens of Samoa. Lewes: Old Inn.
Koca, C., Aşçı, F. H., & Kirazcı, S. (2005). Gender role orientation of athletes and non-athletes in a patriarchal society: a study in Turkey. Sex Roles, 52, 217–225.
Lal, B. V., & Fortune, K. (2000). Pacific islands: An encyclopedia. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Lantz, C., & Schroeder, P. J. (1999). Endorsement of masculine and feminine gender roles: differences between participation in and identification with the athletic role. Journal of Sport Behavior, 22, 545–557.
Lippa, R. A. (2005). Gender, nature, nurture (2nd ed.). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Mageo, J. M. (1998). Theorizing self in Samoa: Emotions, genders and sexualities. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Mead, M. (1928). Coming of age in Samoa. New York: William Morrow and Sons.
Murray, S. O. (2000). Homosexualities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mustanski, B. S., Chivers, M. L., & Bailey, J. M. (2002). A critical review of recent biological research on human sexual orientation. Annual Review of Sex Research, 13, 89–140.
Nanda, S. (1998). Neither man nor woman: The hijras of India. Belmont: Wadsworth.
Nardi, B. A. (1983/84). Infant feeding and women’s work in Western Samoa: a hypothesis, some evidence and suggestions for future research. Ecology of Food and Nutrition, 13/14, 277–286.
Nash, G. (2001). The subversive male: Homosexual and bestial images on European Mesolithic rock art. In L. Bevan (Ed.), Indecent exposure: Sexuality, society and the archaeological record (pp. 43–55). Glasgow: Cruithne.
Ochs, E. (1988). Culture and language development: Language acquisitions and language socialization in a Samoan village. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Partners, Y. (1994). A Yankelovich MONITOR perspective on gays/lesbians. Norwalk: Yankelovich Partners.
Poe, C., series producer. (2004). National Geographic taboo: Sexual identity [motion picture]. Washington: National Geographic Film and Television.
Pollet, T. V., Kuppens, T., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2006). When nieces and nephews become important: differences between childless women and mothers in relationships with nieces and nephews. Journal of Cultural and Evolutionary Psychology, 4, 83–94.
Rahman, Q., & Hull, M. S. (2005). An empirical test of the kin selection hypothesis for male homosexuality. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34, 461–467.
Riggs, J. M. (1997). Mandates for mothers and fathers: perceptions of breadwinners and caregivers. Sex Roles, 37, 565–580.
Ritchie, J., & Ritchie, J. (1983). Polynesian child rearing: an alternative model. Alternative Lifestyles, 5, 126–141.
Ruse, M. (1982). Are there gay genes? Sociobiology and homosexuality. Journal of Homosexuality, 6, 5–34.
Saghir, M. T., & Robins, E. (1973). Male and female homosexuality: A comprehensive investigation. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.
Saville, D. J. (1990). Multiple comparison procedures: the practical solution. American Statistician, 44, 174–180.
Schmidt, J. (2003). Paradise lost? Social change and fa’afafine in Samoa. Current Sociology, 51, 417–432.
Stevenson, M. C. (1901–1902). The Zuni Indians. Bureau of American Ethology Annual Report, 23. Washington, DC.
Totman, R. (2003). The third sex—kathoey: Thailand’s ladyboys. London: Souvenir.
Van de Ven, P., Rodden, P., Crawford, J., & Kippax, S. (1997). A comparative demographic and sexual profile of older homosexually active men. Journal of Sex Research, 34, 349–360.
Vasey, P. L., & Bartlett, N. H. (2007). What can the Samoan fa’afafine teach us about the Western concept of “gender identity disorder in childhood”? Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 50, 481–490.
Vasey, P. L., & VanderLaan, D. P. (2008). Avuncular tendencies in Samoan fa’afafine and the evolution of male androphilia. Archives of Sexual Beahvior, doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9404-3.
Vasey, P. L., Pocock, D. S., & VanderLaan, D. P. (2007). Kin selection and male androphilia in Samoan fa’afafine. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 159–167.
Weinrich, J. D. (1987). Sexual landscapes: Why we are what we are, why we love whom we love. New York: Scribner.
Whitam, F. L. (1983). Culturally invariant properties of male homosexuality: tentative conclusions from cross-cultural research. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 12, 207–226.
Wikan, U. (1977). Man becomes woman: transsexualism in Oman as a key to gender roles. Man, 12, 304–319.
Williams, W. (1992). The spirit and the flesh: Sexual diversity in American Indian culture. Boston: Beacon.
Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge: Belknap.
Wilson, G., & Rahmen, Q. (2005). Born gay: The psychobiology of sex orientation. London: Peter Owen.
Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 699–727.
Yates, T. (1993). Frameworks for an archaeology of the body. In C. Tilley (Ed.), Interpretive archaeology (pp. 31–72). Providence: Berg.
We thank Resitara Apa, Nancy H. Bartlett, Vester Fido Collins, Peniamina Tolovaa Fagai, Liulauulu Faaleolea Ah Fook, Tyrone Laurenson, Jeannette Mageo, Gaualofa Matalavea, Nella Tavita-Levy, David S. Pocock, Trisha Tuiloma, the Kuka family of Savai’i, the Government of Samoa, and all of the individuals who agreed to participate in our study. We also thank three anonymous reviewers and Andrea Camperio Ciani for helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper. We extend special thanks to Alatina Ioelu, without whose help this study would not have been possible. PLV was funded by the University of Lethbridge and a NSERC of Canada Discovery Grant. DPV was funded by an Alberta Graduate Scholarship, a NSERC of Canada Graduate Scholarship-D3, and a Grant-In-Aid of Research from Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society.