Advertisement

Human Nature

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 294–316 | Cite as

Birth Order Influences Reproductive Measures in Australians

  • Fritha MilneEmail author
  • Debra Judge
Article

Abstract

We examine the relationship between birth order and reproductive behaviors in a sample of Australian residents, accounting for personality, personal achievements, and family structure. Using generalized linear models and survival analyses we build predictive models for each reproductive measure and test those models on an independent data subset. Compared with functional firstborns (middle-borns more than 5 years younger than their next older sibling), male middle-borns and last-born females had younger ages of first sexual intercourse, and middle-born females had a younger age at first pregnancy. There was no difference in females’ age at first birth. Male middle-borns tended to have an older average age at first birth. Controlling for age, both male and female middle-borns had fewer children. Overall, middle-borns differ more from functional firstborns than do last-borns. Given the significant but small effect sizes demonstrated in this study, we suggest that developmental characteristics that may facilitate middle-borns’ success within the natal family carry slight fitness costs during the reproductive years.

Keywords

Birth order Reproductive behaviors Personality Survival analysis Within-family analysis Fitness 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Marty Firth, Kevin Murray, and Prof. Lincoln Schmitt for providing consultation on statistical methods. This manuscript benefited from comments from Dr. Jennifer Bell, Dr. Silvana Gaudieri, Prof. John McGeachie, and Dr. Kathy Sanders. We thank the Life History and Ecology study group for their questions, comments, and advice. We are especially grateful to three anonymous reviewers for their careful reading and very useful critique and suggestions. The University of Western Australia Human Research Ethics Committee approved this project, and it was funded by the School of Anatomy and Human Biology at the University of Western Australia. We thank all participants for volunteering; without their candid responses, this study could not have taken place.

References

  1. Adair, L., Pollitt, E., & Mueller, W. H. (1983). Maternal anthropometric changes during pregnancy and lactation in a rural Taiwanese population. Human Biology, 55, 771–787.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, K. G. (1999). Paternal care by genetic fathers and stepfathers I: reports from Albuquerque men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 405–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). 2001. 4102.0 - Australian Social Trends, 2001. Available online at <http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/2ff762f95845417aeca25706c00834efa/b130815d4b2de356ca2570ec000c1c60!Opendocument>.
  4. Bateson, P., Barker, D., Clutton-Brock, T., Deb, D., D’Udine, B., Foley, P. A., et al. (2004). Developmental plasticity and human health. Nature, 430, 419–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belsky, J., Steinberg, L., & Draper, P. (1991). Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy—an evolutionary theory of socialization. Child Development, 62, 647–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beck, E., Burnet, K. L., & Vosper, J. (2006). Birth-order effects on facets of extraversion. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 953–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benet-Martinez, V., & John, O. P. (1998). Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: multitrait multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 729–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bentley, G. R., Paine, R. R., & Boldsen, J. L. (2001). Fertility changes with the prehistoric transition to agriculture: Perspectives from reproductive ecology and paleodemography. In P. T. Ellison (Ed.), Reproductive ecology and human evolution (pp. 203–231). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  9. Blurton Jones N. (1986). Bushman birth spacing—a test for optimal interbirth intervals. Ethology and Sociobiology, 7, 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boone, J. (1988). Parental investment, social subordination and population processes among 15th and 16th century Portuguese nobility. In L. L. Betzig, M. Borgerhoff-Mulder & P. W. Turke (Eds.), Human reproductive behaviour: A Darwinian perspective (pp. 201–219). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Chisholm, J. S. (1999). Attachment and time preference: relationships between early stress and sexual behavior in a sample of American university women. Human Nature, 10, 51–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chisholm, J. S., Quinlivan, J. A., Petersen, R. W., & Coall, D. A. (2005). Early stress predicts age at menarche and first birth, adult attachment and expected lifespan. Human Nature, 16, 233–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  14. Cottler, L. B., Zipp, J. F., Robins, L. N., & Spitznagel, E. L. (1987). Difficult-to-recruit respondents and their effect on prevalence estimates in an epidemiology survey. American Journal of Epidemiology, 1251, 329–339.Google Scholar
  15. Cox, D., & Oakes, D. (1984). Analysis of survival data. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  16. Crespi, E. J., & Denver, R. J. (2005). Ancient origins of human plasticity. American Journal of Human Biology, 17, 44–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  18. Daniels, D., & Plomin, R. (1985). Differential experience of siblings in the same family. Developmental Psychology, 21, 747–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Davis, J. N. (1997). Birth order, sibship size, and status in modern Canada. Human Nature, 8, 205–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dengler, R., Roberts, H., & Rushton, L. (1997). Lifestyle surveys — the complete answer? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 51, 46–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dick, D. M., Johnson, J. K., Viken, R. J., & Rose, R. J. (2000). Testing between-family associations in within-family comparisons. Psychological Science, 11, 409–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Diop-Sidibe, N. (2005). Siblings’ premarital childbearing and the timing of first sex in three major cities of Cote d’Ivoire. International Family Planning Perspectives, 31, 54–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Draper, N. R., & Smith, H. (1966). Applied regression analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  24. Draper, P., & Hames, R. (2000). Birth order, sibling investment, and fertility among Ju/’hoansi (!Kung). Human Nature, 11, 117–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dunn, J., & Plomin, R. (1991). Why are siblings so different? The significance of differences in sibling experiences within the family. Family Processes, 30, 271–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Flinn, M. (1988). Stepparent and genetic parent offspring relationships in a Caribbean village. Ethology and Sociobiology, 9, 335–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goodman, L. A. (1961). Snowball sampling. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32, 148–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gravetter, F., & Wallnau, L. (2007). Statistics for the behavioural sciences (sixth ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  29. Hertwig, R., Davis, J. N., & Sulloway, F. J. (2002). Parental investment: how an equity motive can produce inequality. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 728–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hill, K., & Hurtado, A. M. (1996). Ache life history: the ecology and demography of a foraging people. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  31. Hill, K., & Kaplan, H. (1999). Life history traits in humans: theory and empirical studies. Annual Review of Anthropology, 28, 397–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jefferson, T., Herbst, J. H., & McCrae, R. R. (1998). Associations between birth order and personality traits: Evidence from self-reports and observer ratings. Journal of Research in Personality, 32, 498–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Judge, D. (1995). American legacies and the variable life histories of women and men. Human Nature, 6, 291–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kaplan, H. (1996). A theory of fertility and parental investment in traditional and modern human societies. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 39, 91–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kemkes, A. (2006). Does the sex of firstborn children influence subsequent fertility behavior? Evidence from family reconstitution. Journal of Family History, 31, 144–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kerestes, G. (2006). Birth order and maternal ratings of infant temperament. Studia Psychologica, 48, 95–106.Google Scholar
  37. Kidwell, J. S. (1982). The neglected birth-order—Middle-borns. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 225–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lindert, P. (1977). Sibling position and achievement. Journal of Human Resources, 12, 198–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Maguire, M. C. (1999). Treating the dyad as the unit of analysis: a primer on three analytic approaches. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 213–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mantel, N. (1970). Why stepdown procedures in variable selection. Technometrics, 12, 621–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Michalski, R. L., & Shackelford, T. K. (2001). Methodology, birth order, intelligence, and personality. American Psychologist, 56, 520–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Michalski, R. L., & Shackelford, T. K. (2002a). An attempted replication of the relationships between birth order and personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 182–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Michalski, R. L., & Shackelford, T. K. (2002b). Birth order and sexual strategy. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 661–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. O’Sullivan, E., & Rassel, G. R. (1995). Research methods for public administrators. White Plains NY: Longman.Google Scholar
  45. Pennington, R., & Harpending, H. (1988). Fitness and fertility among Kalahari !Kung. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 77, 303–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pennington, R. L. (1996). Causes of early human population growth. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 99, 259–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rodgers, J., Cleveland, H. H., van den Oord, E., & Rowe, D. C. (2000). Resolving the debate over birth order, family size, and intelligence. American Psychologist, 55, 599–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rodgers, J. L., & Rowe, D. C. (1988). Influence of siblings on adolescent sexual-behavior. Developmental Psychology, 24, 722–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rohde, P., Atzwanger, K., Butovskaya, M., Lampert, A., Mysterud, I., Sanchez-Andres, A., et al. (2003). Perceived parental favoritism, closeness to kin, and the rebel of the family: the effects of birth order and sex. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 261–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Salmon, C. (2003). Birth order and relationships: family, friends, and sexual partners. Human Nature, 14, 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Salmon, C. A., & Daly, M. (1998). Birth order and familial sentiment: Middle-borns are different. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19, 299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Saroglou, V., & Fiasse, L. (2003). Birth order, personality, and religion: a study among young adults from a three-sibling family. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L. R. (1996). Evidence for the Big Five in analyses of familiar English personality adjectives. European Journal of Personality, 10, 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sellen, D. S., & Mace, R. (1997). Fertility and mode of subsistence: a phylogenetic analysis. Current Anthropology, 38, 878–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sinch, P., Pandey, A., & Aggarwal, A. (2007). House-to-house survey vs. snowball technique for capturing maternal deaths in India: A search for a cost-effective method. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 125, 550–556.Google Scholar
  56. Sulloway, F. J. (1995). Birth-order and evolutionary psychology—a meta-analytic overview. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 75–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sulloway F. J. (1996). Born to rebel: Birth order, family dynamics and creative lives. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  58. Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  59. Tableman, M., & Kim, J. (2004). Survival analysis using S: analysis of time-to-event data. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
  60. Trivers, R. L. (1974). Parent-offspring conflict. American Zoologist, 14, 249–264.Google Scholar
  61. Williams, G. (1966). Adaptation and natural selection: a critique of some current evolutionary thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Wood, J. W. (1994). Dynamics of human reproduction: biology, biometry, demography. NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  63. Woodward, M. (2005). Epidemiology: study design and data analysis (2nd ed.). Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
  64. Zajonc, R. B., & Sulloway, F. J. (2007). The confluence model: birth order as a within-family or between-family dynamic? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1187–1194.Google Scholar
  65. Zar, J. H. (1984). Biostatistical analysis (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Anatomy & Human Biology, M309The University of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia
  2. 2.Anatomy & Human BiologyThe University of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia

Personalised recommendations