Human Nature

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 265–282 | Cite as

Sexual coercion and forced in-pair copulation as sperm competition tactics in humans



Rape of women by men might be generated either by a specialized rape adaptation or as a by-product of other psychological adaptations. Although increasing number of sexual partners is a proposed benefit of rape according to the “rape as an adaptation” and the “rape as a by-product” hypotheses, neither hypothesis addresses directly why some men rape their long-term partners, to whom they already have sexual access. In two studies we tested specific hypotheses derived from the general hypothesis that sexual coercion in the context of an intimate relationship may function as a sperm competition tactic. We hypothesized that men’s sexual coercion in the context of an intimate relationship is related positively to his partner’s perceived infidelities and that men’s sexual coercion is related positively to their mate retention behaviors (behaviors designed to prevent a partner’s infidelity). The results from Study 1 (self-reports from 246 men) and Study 2 (partner-reports from 276 women) supported the hypotheses. The Discussion section addresses limitations of this research and highlights future directions for research on sexual coercion in intimate relationships.

Key words

Anti-cuckoldry Forced in-pair copulation Mate retention Sexual coercion Sperm competition 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alexander, R., and K. Noonan 1979 Concealment of Ovulation, Parental Care, and Human Social Evolution. In Evolutionary Biology and Human Social Behavior, N. Chagnon and W. Irons, eds. Pp. 436–453. North Scituate, MA: Duxbury Press.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, K. G. 2006 How Well Does Paternity Confidence Match Actual Paternity? Results from Worldwide Nonpaternity Rates. Current Anthropology 48:511–518.Google Scholar
  3. Andersson, M. 1994 Sexual Selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bailey, R. O., N. R. Seymour, and G. R. Stewart 1978 Rape Behavior in Blue-winged Teal. Auk 95:188–190.Google Scholar
  5. Baker, R. R., and M. A. Bellis 1993 Human Sperm Competition: Ejaculate Adjustment by Males and the Function of Masturbation. Animal Behaviour 46:861–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barash, D. P. 1977 Sociobiology of Rape in Mallards (Anas platyrhynchos): Response of the Mated Male. Science 197:788–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bart, P. 1975 Rape Doesn’t End with a Kiss. Viva 40–42:101–107.Google Scholar
  8. Bellis, M. A., K. Hughes, S. Hughes, and J. R. Ashton 2005 Measuring Paternal Discrepancy and Its Public Health Consequences. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 59:749–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bergen, R. K. 1996 Wife Rape. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Birkhead, T. 2000 Promiscuity. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  11. Birkhead, T. R., F. M. Hunter, and J. E. Pellatt 1989 Sperm Competition in the Zebra Finch, Taeniopygia guttata. Animal Behaviour 38:935–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bowker, L. H. 1983 Marital Rape: A Distinct Syndrome? Social Casework: The Journal of Contemporary Social Work 64:347–352.Google Scholar
  13. Buss, D. M. 1988 From Vigilance to Violence: Tactics of Mate Retention in American Undergraduates. Ethology and Sociobiology 9:291–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buss, D. M., and T. K. Shackelford 1997 From Vigilance to Violence: Mate Retention Tactics in Married Couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72:346–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Campbell, J. C. 1989 Women’s Responses to Sexual Abuse in Intimate Relationships. Women’s Health Care International 8:335–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Campbell, J. C., and K. L. Soeken 1999 Forced Sex and Intimate Partner Violence: Effects on Women’s Risk and Women’s Health. Violence against Women 5:1017–1035.Google Scholar
  17. Cheng, K. M., J. T. Burns, and F. McKinney 1983 Forced Copulation in Captive Mallards, III: Sperm Competition. Auk 100:302–310.Google Scholar
  18. Dixson, A. F. 1998 Primate Sexuality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Dobash, R. E., R. P. Dobash, K. Cavanagh, and R. Lewis 1998 Separate and Intersecting Realities: A Comparison of Men’s and Women’s Accounts of Violence against Women. Violence against Women 4:382–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Edleson, J., and M. Brygger 1986 Gender Differences in Reporting of Battering Incidents. Family Relations 35:377–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Finkelhor, D., and K. Yllo 1985 License to Rape. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
  22. Frieze, I. H. 1983 Investigating the Causes and Consequences of Marital Rape. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 8:532–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gallup G. G., R. L. Burch, M. L. Zappieri, R. A. Parvez, M. L. Stockwell, and J. A. Davis 2003 The Human Penis as a Semen Displacement Device. Evolution and Human Behavior 24:277–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gangestad, S. W., R. Thornhill, and C. E. Garver 2002 Changes in Women’s Sexual Interests and Their Partner’s Mate-Retention Tactics across the Menstrual Cycle: Evidence for Shifting Conflicts of Interest. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 269:975–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Goetz, A. T., T. K. Shackelford, V. A. Weekes-Shackelford, H. A. Euler, S. Hoier, D. P. Schmitt, and C. W. LaMunyon 2005 Mate Retention, Semen Displacement, and Human Sperm Competition: A Preliminary Investigation of Tactics to Prevent and Correct Female Infidelity. Personality and Individual Differences 38:749–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gomendio, M., A. H. Harcourt, and E. R. S. Roldán 1998 Sperm competition in Mammals. In Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection, T. R. Birkhead and A. P. Møller, eds. Pp. 667–756. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  27. Goodwin, D. 1955 Some Observations on the Reproductive Behavior of Rooks. British Birds 48:97–107.Google Scholar
  28. Hall, G. C. N., D. D. Shondrick, and R. Hirschman 1993 The Role of Sexual Arousal in Sexually Aggressive Behavior: A Meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 61:1091–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kilgallon, S. J., and L. W. Simmons 2005 Image Content Influences Men’s Semen Quality. Biology Letters 1:253–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Koss, M. P., and C. J. Oros 1982 Sexual Experiences Survey: A Research Instrument Investigating Sexual Aggression and Victimization. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 50:455–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lalumière, M. L., G. T. Harris, V. L. Quinsey, and M. E. Rice 2005 The Causes of Rape. Washington, DC: APA Press.Google Scholar
  32. Lalumière, M. L., and V. L. Quinsey 1994 The Discriminability of Rapists from Non-Sex Offenders using Phallometric Measures: A Meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior 21:33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Magdol, L., T. E. Moffitt, A. Caspi, D. L. Newman, J. Fagan, and P. A. Silva 1997 Gender Differences in Partner Violence in a Birth Cohort of 21-year-olds: Bridging the Gap between Clinical and Epidemiological Approaches. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 65:68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McKinney, F., K. M. Cheng, and D. J. Bruggers 1984 Sperm Competition in Apparently Monogamous Birds. In Sperm Competition and Evolution of Animal Mating Systems, R. L. Smith, ed. Pp. 523–545. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  35. McKinney, F., S. R. Derrickson, and P. Mineau 1983 Forced Copulation in Waterfowl. Behavior 86:250–294.Google Scholar
  36. McKinney, F., and P. Stolen 1982 Extra-pair-bond Courtship and Forced Copulation among Captive Green-Winged Teal (Anas crecca carolinensis). Animal Behaviour 30:461–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. O’Leary, K. D., and I. Arias 1988 Assessing Agreement of Reports of Spouse Abuse. In Family Abuse and Its Consequences, G. T. Hotaling, D. Finkelhor, J. T. Kirkpatrick, and M. Straus, eds. Pp. 218–227. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Pagelow, M. D. 1981 Woman-battering. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. Painter, K., and D. P. Farrington 1999 Wife Rape in Great Britain. In Women and Justice, R. Muraskin, ed. Pp. 135–164. New York: Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
  40. Parker, G. A. 1970 Sperm Competition and Its Evolutionary Consequences in the Insects. Biological Reviews 45:525–567.Google Scholar
  41. Palmer, C. T. 1991 Human Rape: Adaptation or By-product? Journal of Sex Research 28:365–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pound, N. 2002 Male Interest in Visual Cues of Sperm Competition Risk. Evolution and Human Behavior 23:443–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Russell, D. E. H. 1982 Rape in Marriage. New York: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
  44. Seymour, N. R., and R. D. Titman 1979 Behaviour of Unpaired Male Black Ducks (Anas rupribes) during the Breeding Season in a Nova Scotia Tidal Marsh. Canadian Journal of Zoology 57:2412–2428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shackelford, T. K., and D. M. Buss 1997 Cues to Infidelity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 23:1034–1045.Google Scholar
  46. Shackelford, T. K., and A. T. Goetz 2004 Men’s Sexual Coercion in Intimate Relationships: Development and Initial Validation of the Sexual Coercion in Intimate Relationships Scale. Violence and Victims 19:21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shackelford, T. K., A. T. Goetz, and D. M. Buss 2005 Mate Retention in Marriage: Further Evidence of the Reliability of the Mate Retention Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences 39:415–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shackelford, T. K., A. T. Goetz, D. M. Buss, H. A. Euler, and S. Hoier 2005 When We Hurt the Ones We Love: Predicting Violence against Women from Men’s Mate Retention. Personal Relationships 12:447–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shackelford, T. K., A. T. Goetz, F. E. Guta, and D. P. Schmitt 2006 Mate Guarding and Frequent In-pair Copulation in Humans: Concurrent or Compensatory Anti-cuckoldry Tactics? Human Nature 17:239–252.Google Scholar
  50. Shackelford, T. K., A. T. Goetz, C. W. LaMunyon, B. J. Quintus, and V. A. Weekes-Shackelford 2004 Sex Differences in Sexual Psychology Produce Sex-Similar Preferences for a Short-term Mate. Archives of Sexual Behavior 33:405–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shackelford, T. K., and G. J. LeBlanc 2001 Sperm Competition in Insects, Birds, and Humans: Insights from a Comparative Evolutionary Perspective. Evolution and Cognition 7:194–202.Google Scholar
  52. Shackelford, T. K., G. J. LeBlanc, V. A. Weekes-Shackelford, A. L. Bleske-Rechek, H. A. Euler, and S. Hoier 2002 Psychological Adaptation to Human Sperm Competition. Evolution and Human Behavior 23:123–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shackelford, T. K., N. Pound, and A. T. Goetz 2005 Psychological and Physiological Adaptation to Human Sperm Competition. Review of General Psychology 9:228–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Shields, N. M., and C. R. Hanneke 1983 Battered Wives’ Reactions to Marital Rape. In The Dark Side of Families, R. Gelles, G. Hotaling, M. Straus, and D. Finkelhor, eds. Pp. 131–148. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  55. Shields, W. M., and L. M. Shields 1983 Forcible Rape: An Evolutionary Perspective. Ethology and Sociobiology 4:115–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Smith, R. L. 1984 Human Sperm Competition. In Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems, R. L. Smith, ed. Pp. 601–660. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  57. Thornhill, R., and C. T. Palmer 2000 A Natural History of Rape. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  58. Thornhill, R., and N. W. Thornhill 1983 Human Rape: An Evolutionary Analysis. Ethology and Sociobiology 4:137–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 1992 The Evolutionary Psychology of Men’s Coercive Sexuality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15:363–421.Google Scholar
  60. Tooby, J., and L. Cosmides 1992 The Psychological Foundations of Culture. In The Adapted Mind, J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, and J. Tooby, eds. Pp. 19–136. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Valera, F., H. Hoi, and A. Kristin 2003 Male Shrikes Punish Unfaithful Females. Behavioral Ecology 14:403–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Walker, L. E. 1979 The Battered Woman. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  63. Weis, K., and S. S. Borges 1973 Victimology and Rape: The Case of the Legitimate Victim. Issues in Criminology 8:71–115.Google Scholar
  64. Wilson, M., and M. Daly 1992 The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Chattel. In The Adapted Mind. J. H. Barkow, I. Cosmides, and J. Tooby, eds. Pp. 289–322. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Wyckoff, G. J., W. Wang, and C. Wu 2000 Rapid Evolution of Male Reproductive Genes in the Descent of Man. Nature 403:304–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Transaction Publishers 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyFlorida Atlantic UniversityDavieUSA

Personalised recommendations