Abstract
In Western societies, height is positively correlated with reproductive success (RS) for men but negatively correlated with RS for women. These relationships have been attributed to sexual selection: women prefer tall men, and men prefer short women. It is this success in the marriage market which leads to higher RS for tall men and short women. We have already shown that the relationship between height and RS for women is quite different in a non-Western context. In a subsistence farming community in rural Gambia, height is positively correlated with reproductive success for women, largely owing to the higher survival of the children of tall women. Here, the relationship between height and reproductive success is analyzed for men in the same community. For these Gambian men, there is no significant relationship between height and the number of children they produce, although tall men do contract more marriages than shorter men. We conclude that environmental context needs to be taken into account when analyzing human reproductive behavior.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allal, N., R. Sear, A. M. Prentice and R. Mace 2004 An Evolutionary Model of Stature, Age At First Birth and Reproductive Success in Gambian Women. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences 271:465–470.
Anderson, K.G. 2006 How Well Does Paternity Confidence Match Actual Paternity? Evidence from Worldwide Nonpaternity Rates. Current Anthropology 47:513–520.
Barker, D.J.P., C. Osmond and J. Golding 1990 Height and Mortality in the Counties of England and Wales. Annals of Human Biology 17:1–6.
Billewicz, W.Z., and I.A. McGregor 1981 The Demography of Two West African (Gambian) Villages, 1951–75. Journal of Biosocial Science 13:219–240.
Cavelaars, A., A.E. Kunst, J.J.M. Geurts, R. Crialesi, L. Grotvedt, U. Helmert, E. Lahelma, O. Lundberg, A. Mielck, N.K. Rasmussen, E. Regidor, T. Spuhler and J.P. Mackenbach 2000 Persistent Variations in Average Height between Countries and between Socioeconomic Groups: An Overview of 10 European Countries. Annals of Human Biology 27:407–421.
Chu, S., and K. Geary 2005 Physical Stature Influences Character Perception in Women. Personality and Individual Differences 38:1927–1934.
Furnham, A., and P. Baguma 1994 Cross-Cultural Differences in the Evaluation of Male and Female Body Shapes. International Journal of Eating Disorders 15:81–89.
Furnham, A., M. Dias, and A. McClelland 1998 The Role of Body Weight, Waist-to-Hip Ratio, and Breast Size in Judgments of Female Attractiveness. Sex Roles 39:311–326.
Gillis, J.S., and W.E. Avis 1980 The Male Taller Norm in Mate Selection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 6:396–401.
Hume, D.K., and R. Montgomerie 2001 Facial Attractiveness Signals Different Aspects of “Quality” in Women and Men. Evolution and Human Behavior 22:93–112.
Kanazawa, S., and D.L. Novak 2005 Human Sexual Dimorphism in Size May Be Triggered by Environmental Cues. Journal of Biosocial Science 37:657–665.
Lamb, W.H., C.M.B. Lamb, F.A. Foord, and R.G. Whitehead 1984 Changes in Maternal and Child Mortality Rates in Three Isolated Gambian Villages over Ten Years. Lancet 2:912–914.
Marmot, M.G., M.J. Shipley, and G. Rose 1984 Inequalities in Death: Specific Explanations of a General Pattern? Lancet 1:1003–1006.
Mascie-Taylor, C.G.N. 1987 Assortative Mating in A Contemporary British Population. Annals of Human Biology 14: 59–68.
McGregor, I.A. 1991 Morbidity and Mortality at Keneba, The Gambia, 1950–75. In Disease and Mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa, R.G. Feacham and D.T. Jamison, eds. Pp. 306–324. Oxford: Oxford University Press for the World Bank.
McGregor, I.A., and D.A. Smith 1952 A Health, Nutrition and Parasitological Survey in A Rural Village (Keneba) in West Kiang, Gambia. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 46:403–427.
Mueller, U., and A. Mazur 2001 Evidence of Unconstrained Directional Selection for Male Tallness. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 50:302–311.
Murray, J.E. 2000 Marital Protection and Marital Selection: Evidence from a Historical-Prospective Sample of American Men. Demography 37:511–521.
Nettle, D. 2002a Height and Reproductive Success in a Cohort of British Men. Human Nature 13:473–491.
2002b Women’s Height, Reproductive Success and the Evolution of Sexual Dimorphism in Modern Humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences 269:1919–1923.
Pawlowski, B., and S. Koziel 2002 The Impact of Traits Offered in personal Advertisements on Response Rates. Evolution and Human Behavior 23:139–149.
Pawlowski, B., R.I.M. Dunbar, and A. Lipowicz 2000 Evolutionary Fitness: Tall Men Have More Reproductive Success. Nature 403:156.
Perrett, D. I., D. M. Burt, I. S. Penton-Voak, K. J. Lee, D. A. Rowland and R. Edwards 1999 Symmetry and Human Facial Attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior 20:295–307.
Pierce, C. A. 1996 Body Height and Romantic Attraction: A Meta-analytic Test of the Male-Taller Norm. Social Behavior and Personality 24:143–149.
Roberts, D. F., W. Z. Billewicz, and I. A. McGregor 1978 Heritability of Stature in a West African Population. Annals of Human Genetics. London 42:15–24.
Sear, R. S. 2001 Evolutionary Demography of a Rural Gambian Population. PhD thesis, University College London.
n.d. Size, Body Condition and Adult Mortality in Rural Gambia: A Life History Perspective. Ms. under review. available at 〈http://personal.lse.ac.uk/SEAR/〉
Sear, R., N. Allal, and R. Mace 2004 Height, Marriage and Reproductive Success in Gambian Women. Research in Economic Anthropology 23:203–224.
Shepperd, J. A., and A. J. Strathman 1989 Attractiveness and Height: The Role of Stature in Dating Preference, Frequency of Dating, and Perceptions of Attractiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 15:617–627.
Silventoinen, K. 2003 Determinants of Variation in Adult Body Height. Journal of Biosocial Science 35:263–285.
Silventoinen, K., E. Lahelma, and O. Rahkonen 1999 Social Background, Adult Body Height and Health. International Journal of Epidemiology 28:911–918.
Singh, D. 1993 Body Shape and Women’s Attractiveness: The Critical Role of Waist-to-Hip Ratio. Human Nature 4:297–321.
Strassmann, B. I., and B. Gillespie 2002 Life-History Theory, Fertility and Reproductive Success in Humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B: Biological Sciences 269:553–562.
Streeter, S. A., and D. H. McBurney 2003 Waist-Hip Ratio and Attractiveness: New Evidence and A Critique of “A Critical Test.” Evolution and Human Behavior 24:88–98.
Susanne, C., and Y. Lepage 1988 Assortative Mating for Anthropometric Characteristics. In Human Mating Patterns, C. G. N. Mascie-Taylor and A. J. Boyce, ed. Pp. 83–99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Symons, D. 1992 On the Use and Misuse of Darwinism in the Study of Human Behaviour. In The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides and J. Tooby, eds. Pp. 137–159. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thompson, E. D. B. 1965 Marriage, Childbirth and Early Childhood in a Gambian Village: A Socio-Medical Study. PhD thesis, University of Aberdeen.
Turrell, G. 2002 Socioeconomic Position and Height in Early Adulthood. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 26:468–472.
Waaler, H. T. 1984 Height, Weight and Mortality: The Norwegian Experience. Acta Medica Scandinavica (Suppl.) 679:1–51.
Weaver, L. T., and S. Beckerleg 1993 Is Health Sustainable? A Village Study in the Gambia. Lancet 341:1327–1330.
Wetsman, A., and F. Marlowe 1999 How Universal Are Preferences for Female Waist-to-Hip Ratios? Evidence from the Hadza of Tanzania. Evolution and Human Behavior 20:219–228.
Yu, D. W., and G. H. Shepard 1998 Is Beauty in the Eye of the Beholder? Nature 396:321–322.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Rebecca Sear is a Lecturer in Population Studies at the London School of Economics. She has degrees in zoology and biological anthropology, and she received her Ph.D. from University College London in 2001.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sear, R. Height and reproductive success. Hum Nat 17, 405–418 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-006-1003-1
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-006-1003-1