Advertisement

Human Nature

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 278–292 | Cite as

Utilities of gossip across organizational levels

Multilevel selection, free-riders, and teams
  • Kevin M. KniffinEmail author
  • David Sloan Wilson
Article

Abstract

Gossip is a subject that has been studied by researchers from an array of disciplines with various foci and methods. We measured the content of language use by members of a competitive sports team across 18 months, integrating qualitative ethnographic methods with quantitative sampling and analysis. We hypothesized that the use of gossip will vary significantly depending on whether it is used for self-serving or group-serving purposes. Our results support a model of gossip derived from multilevel selection theory that expects gossip to serve group-beneficial rules when rewards are partitioned at the group level on a scale that permits mutual monitoring. We integrate our case study with earlier studies of gossip conducted by anthropologists, psychologists, and management researchers.

Key words

Gossip Multilevel selection theory Organizational behavior Organizational levels Social control 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acheson, James M. 1988 The Lobster Gangs of Maine. Hanover, New Hampshire: University of New England Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, Richard D. 1997 On God and Such. Human Behavior and Evolution Society Newsletter (Spring):1–5.Google Scholar
  3. Boehm, Christopher 1993 Egalitarian Behavior and Reverse Dominance Hierarchy. Current Anthropology 34:227–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 1996 Emergency Decisions, Cultural Selection Mechanics, and Group Selection. Current Anthropology 37:763–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 1997 Egalitarian Behavior and the Evolution of Political Intelligence. American Naturalist 150:s100-s121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 1999 The Natural Selection of Altruistic Traits. Human Nature 10:205–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowlby, John 1969 Attachment and Loss. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bowles, Samuel, and Herbert Gintis 2004 The Evolution of Strong Reciprocity: Cooperation in Heterogeneous Populations. Theoretical Population Biology 65:17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boyd, Robert, Herbert Gintis, Samuel Bowles, and Peter J. Richerson 2003 The Evolution of Altruistic Punishment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100(6):3531–3535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Campbell, Donald T. 1994 How Individual and Face-to-Face Group Selection Undermine Firm Selection in Organizational Evolution. In Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations, J. A. C. Baum and J. V. Singh, eds. Pp. 23–38. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Davenport, Noa, Ruth Distler Schwartz, and Gail Pursell Elliott 1999 Mobbing: Emotional Abuse in the American Workplace. Ames, Iowa: Civil Society.Google Scholar
  12. Dunbar, Robin I. M. 1993 Coevolution of Neocortical Size, Group Size and Language in Humans. Behavior and Brain Sciences 16:685–735.Google Scholar
  13. 1996 Grooming, Gossip, and the Evolution of Language. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. 1999 Culture, Honesty, and the Free-Rider Problem. In The Evolution of Culture, R. Dunbar, C. Knight, and C. Power, eds. Pp. 194–213. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Dunbar, R. I. M., N. D. C. Duncan, and Anna Marriott 1997 Human Conversational Behavior. Human Nature 8:231–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ellickson, Robert C. 1991 Order without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Emler, Nicholas 2001 Gossiping. In The New Handbook of Language and Social Psychology, W. P. Robinson and H. Giles, eds. Pp. 317–338. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  18. Enquist, Magnus, and Olof Leimar 1993 The Evolution of Cooperation in Mobile Organisms. Animal Behaviour 45:747–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Evans, Stephen 2000 Office Gossip “Makes Workers Productive.” BBC News (November 22). 〈http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1034510.stm〉Google Scholar
  20. Fehr, Enrst, Urs Fischbacher, and Simon Gachter 2002 Strong Reciprocity, Human Cooperation, and the Enforcement of Social Norms. Human Nature 13:1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Foley, Robert 1995/1996 The Adaptive Legacy of Human Evolution: A Search for the Environment of Evolutionary Adaptedness. Evolutionary Anthropology 4:194–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gluckman, Max 1963 Gossip and Scandal. Current Anthropology 4:307–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Glover, Linda 2001 Communication and Consultation in a Greenfield Site Company. Personnel Review 30:297–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Goodnight, Charles J., and Lori Stevens 1997 Experimental Studies of Group Selection: What Do They Tell Us about Group Selection in Nature? American Naturalist 150:s559-s579.Google Scholar
  25. Hamilton, Barton H., Jack A. Nickerson, and Hideo Owan 2003 Team Incentives and Worker Heterogeneity: An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Teams on Productivity and Participation. Journal of Political Economy 111:465–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haviland, J. B. 1977 Gossip, Reputation, and Knowledge in Zinacantan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hill, R. A., and R. I. M. Dunbar 2003 Social Network Size in Humans. Human Nature 14:53–72.Google Scholar
  28. Knez, Marc, and Duncan Simester 2001 Firm-Wide Incentives and Mutual Monitoring at Continental Airlines. Journal of Labor Economics 19:743–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kniffin, Kevin M., and David Sloan Wilson 2004 The Effect of Nonphysical Traits on the Perception of Physical Attractiveness: Three Naturalistic Studies. Evolution and Human Behavior 25:88–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kurland, Nancy B., and Lisa Hope Pelled 2000 Passing the Word: Toward a Model of Gossip and Power in the Workplace. Academy of Management Review 25:428–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mann, Janet, Thomas Ten Have, James W. Plunkett, and Samuel J. Meisels 1991 Time Sampling: A Methodological Critique. Child Development 62:227–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McAndrew, Frank T., and Megan A. Milenkovic 2002 Of Tabloids and Family Secrets: The Evolutionary Psychology of Gossip. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 32:1064–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mehl, Matthias R., and James W. Pennebaker 2003 The Sounds of Social Life: A Psychometric Analysis of Students’ Daily Social Environments and Natural Conversations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84:857–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Merry, S. E. 1984 Rethinking Gossip and Scandal. In Toward a General Theory of Social Control: Fundamentals, D. Black, ed. Pp. 271–301. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  35. Morris, Jonathan 2001 Gossips Gagged in Brazil. BBC News (July 19). 〈http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/1445703.stm〉Google Scholar
  36. Muir, W. M. 1996 Group Selection for Adaptation to Multiple-Hen Cages: Selection Program and Direct Responses. Poultry Science 75:447–458.Google Scholar
  37. Nicholson, Nigel 2001 Evolved to Chat: The New Word on Gossip. Psychology Today (May/June):41–45.Google Scholar
  38. Noon, Mike 2001 Suggested Revisions to Kurland and Pellend’s Model of Gossip and Power. Academy of Management Review 26:173–174.Google Scholar
  39. Noon, Mike, and Rick Delbridge 1993 News from Behind My Hand: Gossip in Organizations. Organization Studies 14:23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ostrom, Elinor, Roy Gardner, and James Walker 1994 Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  41. Paine, R. 1967 What Is Gossip About? An Alternative Hypothesis. Man 2:278–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Prietula, Michael 2001 Advice, Trust, and Gossip among Artificial Agents. In Dynamics of Organizations, A. Lomi and E. R. Larson, eds. Pp. 141–177. Menlo Park, California: AAAI Press/MIT Press.Google Scholar
  43. Richerson, Peter J., and Robert Boyd 1999 Complex Societies: The Evolutionary Origins of a Crude Superorganism. Human Nature 10:253–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Scott, James C. 1985 Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Smith, Eric Alden 2004 Why Do Good Hunters Have Higher Reproductive Success? Human Nature 15:343–364.Google Scholar
  46. Sober, Elliott, and David Sloan Wilson 1998 Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Swenson, William, Jeff Arendt, and David Sloan Wilson 2000 Artificial Selection of Microbial Ecosystems for 3-chloroaniline Biodegradation. Environmental Microbiology 2:564–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tooby, John, and Leda Cosmides 1992 The Psychological Foundations of Culture. In The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, and J. Tooby, eds. Pp. 19–136. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Wilson, David Sloan 2002 Darwin’s Cathedral: Evolution, Religion, and the Nature of Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  50. Wilson, David Sloan, and Kevin M. Kniffin 1999 Multilevel Selection and the Social Transmission of Behavior. Human Nature 10:291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 2003 Altruism from an Evolutionary Perspective. In Research on Altruism and Love, S. G. Post et al., eds. Pp. 117–136. Radnor, Pennsylvania: Templeton Foundation Press.Google Scholar
  52. Wilson, David Sloan, and Rick O’Gorman 2003 Emotions and Actions Associated with Norm-Breaking Events. Human Nature 14:277–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wilson, David Sloan, Carolyn Wilczynski, Alexandra Wells, and Laura Weiser 2000 Gossip and Other Aspects of Language as Group-Level Adaptations. In Cognition and Evolution, C. Heyes, ed. Pp. 347–366. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Transaction Publishers 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State University of New YorkBinghamton
  2. 2.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadison

Personalised recommendations