Skip to main content
Log in

An economic approach to the evolution of male-female exchange

  • Published:
Human Nature Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Males and females of a number of animal species divide labor and provide jointly for offspring. Males may provide food, for example, while females protect defenseless young. This exchange is unlikely, however, unless a prior partnership has been established in which a female practices fidelity in exchange for a male’s provisioning activity. The formation of the trading partnership is itself an exchange, and economic theory can help explain when and why there are mutual gains from trading fidelity for resources. Environmental factors determine the potential gains from trade while evolved psychological mechanisms influence the extent to which gains are realized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Axelrod, R. 1984 The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R., and W. Hamilton 1981 The Evolution of Cooperation. Science 211:1390–1396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badcock, C. 2000 Evolutionary Psychology: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, M. 1998 Can Behavior Genetics Contribute to Evolutionary Behavioral Science? In Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology: Ideas and Applications, C. Crawford and D. Krebs, eds. Pp. 211–233. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bercovitch, F. 1995 Female Cooperation, Consortship Maintenance, and Male Mating Success in Savannah Baboons. Animal Behavior 50:137–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betzig, L. 1988 Mating and Parenting in Darwinian Perspective. In Human Reproductive Behavior, L. Betzig, M. Borgerhoff Mulder, and P. Turke, eds. Pp. 3–20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1989 Causes of Conjugal Dissolution: A Cross-Cultural Study. Current Anthropology 30:654–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead, T. and A. Møller 1992 Sperm Competition in Birds. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brédart, S., and R. French 1999 Do Babies Resemble Their Fathers More Than Their Mothers? A Failure to Replicate Christenfeld and Hill (1995). Evolution and Human Behavior 20:129–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D., and D. Hotra 1988 Are Prescriptively Monogamous Societies Effectively Monogamous? In Human Reproductive Behavior, L. Betzig, M. Borgerhoff Mulder, and P. Turke, eds. Pp. 153–159. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. 1994 The Evolution of Desire: Strategies of Human Mating. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1999 Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • 2000 The Dangerous Passion: Why Jealousy Is as Necessary as Love and Sex. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D., and D. Schmitt 1993 Sexual Strategies Theory: An Evolutionary Perspective on Human Mating. Psychological Review 100:204–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnov, E. 1976 Optimal Foraging: The Marginal Value Theorem. Ecology 9:129–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, I. 1980 Cooperative and Non-cooperative Behavior in Animals. American Naturalist 115:827–857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christenfeld, N., and E. Hill 1995 Whose Baby Are You? Nature 378:669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. 1991 The Evolution of Parental Care. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T., and P. Harvey 1978 Mammals, Resources, and Reproductive Strategies. Nature 273:191–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, H. 1991 The Ant and the Peacock. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M., M. Wilson, and S. Wegworst 1982 Male Sexual Jealousy. Ethology and Sociobiology 3:11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, N. 1992 Dunnock Behavior and Social Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, F. 1996 Good Natured. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 2001 Apes from Venus: Bonobos and Human Social Evolution. In Tree of Origin: What Primate Behavior Can Tell Us about Human Social Evolution, F. de Waal, ed. Pp. 41–68. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickemann, M. 1981 Paternal Confidence and Dowry Competition: A Biocultural Analysis of Purdah. In Natural Selection and Social Behavior: Recent Research and New Theory, R. Alexander and D. Tinkle, eds. Pp. 417–438. New York: Chiron Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R. 2001 The Economics of Male Mating Strategies. In Economics in Nature: Social Dilemmas, Mate Choice and Biological Markets, R. Noë, J. van Hooff, and P. Hammerstein, eds. Pp. 245–269. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einon, D. 1998 How Many Children Can One Man have? Evolution and Human Behavior 19:413–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekelund, R., and R. Hébert 1990 A History of Economic Thought and Method. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler, J. 1986 Natural Selection in the Wild. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Essock-Vitale, S., and M. McGuire 1988 What 70 Million Years Hath Wrought: Sexual Histories and Reproductive Success of a Random Sample of American Women. In Human Reproductive Behavior, L. Betzig, M. Borgerhoff Mulder and P. Turke, eds. Pp. 263–276. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, H. 1982 The Sex Contract: The Evolution of Human Behavior. London: Granada.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1989 Evolution of Human Serial Pairbonding. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 78:331–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 1992 Anatomy of Love: The Natural History of Monogamy, Adultery and Divorce. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1998 Lust, Attraction, and Attachment in Mammalian Reproduction. Human Nature 9:23–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. 1930 The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. 1988 Passions within Reason. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gangstead, S., and R. Thornhill 1997 The Evolutionary Psychology of Extra-Pair Sex: The Role of Fluctuating Asymmetry. Evolution and Human Behavior 18:69–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldizen, A. 1986 Tamarins and Marmosets: Communal Care of Offspring. In Primate Societies, B. Smuts, D. Cheney, R. Seyfarth, R. Wrangham, J. Struhsaker, eds. Pp. 34–43. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, R. 2000 How Many Children Could Moulay Ishmail Have Had? Evolution and Human Behavior 21:295–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowaty, P. 1992 Evolutionary Biology and Feminism. Human Nature 3:217–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1996 Battles of the Sexes and Origins of Monogamy. In Partnerships in Birds: The Study of Monogamy, J. Black, ed. Pp. 21–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1997 Sexual Dialectics, Sexual Selection, and Variation in Reproductive Behavior. In Feminism and Evolutionary Biology: Boundaries, Intersections, and Frontiers, P. Gowaty, ed. Pp. 351–384. New York: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hames, R. 1992 Time Allocation. In Evolutionary Ecology and Human Behavior, E. Smith and B. Winterhalder, eds. Pp. 203–235. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. 1964 The Genetical Evolution of Social Behaviour, I. Journal of Theoretical Biology 7:1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, K., A. Rogers, and E. Charnov 1995 The Male’s Dilemma: Increased Offspring Production Is More Paternity to Steal. Evolutionary Ecology 9:662–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J., and R. Quandt 1958 Microeconomic theory: A Mathematical Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewlett, B. 1988 Sexual Selection and Paternal Investment among Aka Pygmies. In Human Reproductive Behavior, L. Betzig, M. Borgerhoff Mulder, and P. Turke, eds. Pp. 263–276. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, K., and H. Kaplan 1988 Tradeoffs in Male and Female Reproductive Strategies among the Ache, parts I and II. In Human Reproductive Behavior, L. Betzig, M. Borgerhoff Mulder, and P. Turke, eds. Pp. 277–305. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer, J. 1995 Anarchy and Its Breakdown. Journal of Political Economy 103:26–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, S. B. 1981 The Woman That Never Evolved. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1986 Empathy, Polyandry, and the Myth of the Coy Female. In Feminist Approaches to Science, R. Bleier, ed. Pp 119–146. Elmsford, New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1997 Raising Darwin’s Consciousness. Human Nature 8:1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1999 Mother Nature. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, S. B., and G. Williams 1983 Behavioral Biology and the Double Standard. In Social Behavior of Female Vertebrates, S. Wasser, ed. Pp. 3–17. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. 1992 Treatise of Human Nature. Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books. (Originally published in 1739)

    Google Scholar 

  • Insel, T. 1992 Oxytocin—A Neuropeptide for Affiliation: Evidence from Behavioral, Receptor Autoradiographic and Comparative Studies. Psychoneuroendocrinology 17:3–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irons, W. 1983 Human Female Reproductive Strategies. In Social Behavior of Female Vertebrates, S. Wasser, ed. Pp. 169–213. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaac, G. 1978 The Food-Sharing Behavior of Protohuman Hominids. Scientific American 238:90–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 1983 Aspects of Human Evolution. In Evolution from Molecules to Men, D. Bendall, ed. Pp. 510–543. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenrick, D., E. Sadalla, G. Groth, and M. Trost 1990 Evolution, Traits and the Stages of Human Courtship. Journal of Personality 58:97–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Key, C., and L. Aiello 2000 A Prisoner’s Dilemma Model of the Evolution of Paternal Care. Folia Primatologica 71:77–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, J. 1997 The Evolutionary History of Human Parental Investment in Relation to Population Growth and Social Stratification. In Feminism and Evolutionary Biology: Boundaries, Intersections, and Frontiers, P. Gowaty, ed. Pp. 466–488. New York: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, J., and H. Kaplan 1992 Human Mating and Family Formation Strategies: The Effects of Variability among Males in Quality and the Allocation of Mating Effort and Parental Investment. In Topics in Primatology, Vol. 1: Human Origins, T. Nishida, W. Mc-Grew, P. Marler, M. Pickford, and F. de Waal, eds. Pp 21–33. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. 2000 The Mating Mind. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller, A. 1988 Paternity and Paternal Care in the Swallow, Hirundo rustica. Animal Behavior:36:996–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nesse, R. 1990 Evolutionary Explanation of Emotion. Human Nature 1:261–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. 1971 The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérusse, D. 1994 Mate Choice in Modern Societies: Testing Evolutionary Hypotheses with Behavioral Data. Human Nature 5:255–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrie, M., M. Hall, T. Halliday, H. Budgey, and C. Pierpoint 1992 Multiple Mating in a Lekking Bird: Why Do Peahens Mate with More Than One Male and with the Same Male More Than Once? Behavioral Ecology 31:349–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pusey, A. 2001 Of Genes and Apes: Chimpanzee Social Organization. In Tree of Origin: What Primate Behavior Can Tell Us about Human Social Evolution, F. de Waal, ed. Pp. 9–37. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricardo, D. 1911 The Principles of Economics and Taxation. London: J. M. Dent & Sons. (Originally published in 1817)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, M. 1993 The Red Queen. London: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roff, D. 1992 The Evolution of Life Histories: Theory and Analysis. New York: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skyrms, B. 1994 Darwin Meets The Logic of Decision: Correlation in Evolutionary Game Theory. Philosophy of Science 61:503–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1996 Evolution of the Social Contract. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, M. 1992 The Evolution of Female Sexuality and Mate Selection in Humans. Human Nature 133–156.

  • Smith, A. 1981 An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics. (Originally published in 1776)

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. 1984 Human Sperm Competition. In Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems, R. Smith, ed. Pp. 601–659. New York: Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Smuts, B. 1995 The Evolutionary Origins of Patriarchy. Human Nature 6:1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R., and S. Gangstead 1999 The Scent of Symmetry: A Human Sex Pheromone That Signals Fitness? Evolution and Human Behavior 20:175–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. 1972 Parental Investment and Sexual Selection. In Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871–1971, B. G. Campbell, ed. Pp. 136–179. London: Heinemann Educational Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1981 Sociobiology and Politics. In Sociobiology and Human Politics, E. White, ed. Pp. 1–44. Lexington, Massachusetts: D.C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1983 The Evolution of a Sense of Fairness. In Absolute Values and the Creation of the New World, Vol. II. Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on the Unity of the Sciences. Pp. 1189–1208. New York: International Cultural Foundation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1985 Social Evolution. Menlo Park, California: Benjamin/Cummings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, A. 1997 The Evolutionary Psychology of Mate Selection in Morocco: A Multivariate Approach. Human Nature 8:113–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissburg, M. 1992 Sex and the Single Forager: Gender-Specific Energy Maximizing Strategies in the Fiddler Crab Uca pugnax. Ecology 74:279–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. 1989 A Sociobiological Expansion of Evolution and Ethics. In Evolution and Ethics, with New Essays on Its Victorian and Socibiological Context, G. Williams and J. Paradis, eds. Pp. 179–236. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. 1994 Adaptive Genetic Variation and Human Evolutionary Psychology. Ethology and Sociobiology 15:219–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M., and M. Daly 1992 The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Chattel. In The Adapted Mind, J. Barkow, L. Cosmides, and J. Tooby, eds. Pp. 289–322. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham, R. 1993 The Evolution of Sexuality in Chimpanzees and Bonobos. Human Nature 4:47–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • 2001 Out of the Pan, Into the Fire: How Our Ancestors’ Evolution Depended on What They Ate. In Tree of Origin: What Primate Behavior Can Tell Us about Human Social Evolution, F. de Waal, ed. Pp. 121–143. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham, R., and D. Peterson 1996 Demonic Males. New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yosef, R. 1991 Females Seek Males with Ready Cache. Natural History 6:37.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William O. Shropshire.

Additional information

William Shropshire (B.A., Washington and Lee University; Ph.D., Duke University) is emeritus Callaway Professor of Economics at Oglethorpe University, Atlanta, Georgia. He is currently interested in the social thought of David Hume and other Scottish moralists and the extent to which it is consistent with the findings of contemporary evolutionary theory.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shropshire, W.O. An economic approach to the evolution of male-female exchange. Hum Nat 14, 235–266 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-003-1005-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-003-1005-1

Key words

Navigation