This study investigated the use of mobile telephones by males and females in a public bar frequented by professional people. We found that, unlike women, men who possess mobile telephones more often publicly display them, and that these displays were related to the number of men in a social group, but not the number of women. This result was not due simply to a greater number of males who have telephones: we found an increase with male social group size in the proportion of available telephones that were on display. Similarly, there was a positive relationship between the number of visible telephones and the ratio of males to females. Our results further show that the increased display of telephones in groups with more males is not due to the ostensive function of these devices (i.e., the making and receiving of calls), although single males tended to use their phones more. We interpret these results within the framework of male-male competition, with males in larger group sizes functioning in an increasingly competitive environment. This competitive environment is suggested to be akin to a lek mating system in which males aggregate and actively display their qualities to females who assess males on a number of dimensions. We suggest that mobile telephones might be used by males as an indicator of their status and wealth (sensu “cultural ornaments”).
Key wordsCultural ornaments Male display Mobile telephones Sex ratio
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Altmann, J. 1974 Observational Study of Behaviour: Sampling Methods. Behaviour 49:227–265.Google Scholar
- Daly, M., and M. Wilson 1983 Sex, Evolution, and Behavior. Belmont, California: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
- Davies, N. B. 1991 Mating Systems. In Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, third ed., J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies, eds. Pp. 263–294. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.Google Scholar
- Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. 1970 Ethology: The Biology of Behaviour. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
- Ellis, B. J. 1992 The Evolution of Sexual Attraction: Evaluative Mechanisms in Women. In The Adapted Mind, J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, and J. Tooby, eds. Pp. 267–288. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Grammar, K. 1989 Human Courtship Behaviour: Biological Basis and Cognitive Processing. In The Sociobiology of Sexual and Reproductive Strategies, A. E. Rasa, C. Vogel, and E. Voland, eds. Pp. 147–169. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
- Low, B. S. 1979 Sexual Selection and Human Ornamentation. In Evolutionary Biology and Human Social Behavior: An Anthropological Perspective, N. A. Chagnon and W. Irons, eds. Pp. 462–487. North Scituate, Massachusetts: Duxbury Press.Google Scholar
- Rowanchilde, R. 1996 Male Genital Modification: A Sexual Selection Interpretation. Human Nature 7:189–215.Google Scholar
- Wright, R. 1994 The Moral Animal. London: Little, Brown.Google Scholar