Skip to main content
Log in

A Preliminary Study of Alternative Open Access Journal Indexes

Publishing Research Quarterly Aims and scope

Abstract

This paper examines a group of selected open access journal indexes by non-mainstream index providers. It finds that journals seeking such indexing are mainly “predatory” journals. Most of these so-called alternative indexes have not provided any evidence of employing quality assessment in journal inclusions. They also are not supporting interoperability for online searching across the Web. Comparisons among the alternative indexes yield many overlaps of journals, indicating shared business of these indexes and journals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Archambault E, Larivière V. History of the journal impact factor: contingencies and consequences. Scientometrics. 2009;79(3):635–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Garfield E. The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA. 2006;295(1):90–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Falagas ME, Kouranos VD, Arencibia-Jorge R, Karageorgopoulos DE. Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor. FASEB J. 2008;22(8):2623–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Google Scholar. Inclusion guidelines for webmasters. https://scholar.google.com/intl/en/scholar/inclusion.html. Accessed 15 Jan 2019.

  5. McVeigh ME. Open access journals in the ISI citation databases: analysis of impact factors and citation patterns. https://ips.clarivate.com//m/pdfs/openaccesscitations2.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2019.

  6. Electronic Journals Library. About the EZB. https://rzblx1.uni-regensburg.de/ezeit/about.phtml?bibid=AAAAA&colors=7&lang=en. Accessed 15 Jan 2019.

  7. Bohannon J. Who’s afraid of peer review? Science. 2013;342(6154):60–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Clark J, Smith R. Firm action needed on predatory journals. BMJ. 2015;350:h210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Marchitelli A, Galimberti P, Bollini A, Mitchell D. Improvement of editorial quality of journals indexed in DOAJ: a data analysis. JLIS. 2017;8(1):1–21. https://doi.org/10.4403/jlis.it-12052.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Beall J. Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature. 2012;489(179):179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jalalian M. The story of fake impact factor companies and how we detected them. Electron Physician. 2015;7(2):1069–72.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Butler D. Sham journals scam authors. Nature. 2013;495(7442):421–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gutierrez FRS, Beall J, Forero DA. Spurious alternative impact factors: the scale of the problem from an academic perspective. BioEssays. 2015;37(5):474–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Xia J, Smith MP. Alternative journal impact factors in open access publishing. Learn Publ. 2018;31(4):403–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shen C, Björk BC. ‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics. BMC Med. 2015;13:230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Adams C. Directory of open access journals introduces new standards to help community address quality concerns. SPARC, 2015. https://sparcopen.org/news/2015/directory-of-open-access-journals-introduces-new-standards-to-help-community-address-quality-concerns/. Accessed 15 Jan 2019.

  17. Crawford W. Journals, “journals” and wannabes: investigating the list. Cites Insights. 2014;14(7):1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yeates S. After Beall’s ‘list of predatory publishers’: problems with the list and paths forward. Inf Res 2017; 22(4).

  19. Xia J. An examination of two Indian megajournals. Learn Publ. 2014;27(3):195–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Directory of Open Access Journals. https://doaj.org/about. Accessed 15 Jan 2019.

  21. Testa J. Journal selection process. Clarivate Analytics. https://clarivate.com/essays/journal-selection-process. Accessed 15 Jan 2019.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jingfeng Xia.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xia, J. A Preliminary Study of Alternative Open Access Journal Indexes. Pub Res Q 35, 274–284 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-019-09642-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-019-09642-y

Keywords

Navigation