Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Forty-Five Years of LIS Research Evolution, 1971–2015: An Informetrics Study of the Author-Supplied Keywords

  • Published:
Publishing Research Quarterly Aims and scope

Abstract

This article sought to investigate the evolution of library and information science by tracking the author-supplied keywords in the research articles published in the domain between 1971 and 2015. Data was extracted from Thomson Reuters’ citation mainstream indexes and analysed using the VosViewer computer-aided software to obtain author-supplied keyword frequencies in each decade since 1971. We identified the most salient and common research themes in LIS and how the themes have evolved, by delving into the author-supplied keywords to proxy research themes in the field domain. Results indicate that the field of LIS has evolved in terms of its subject focus from information systems design and management in the 1970s to scientific communication, information storage and retrieval, information access, information and knowledge management, and user education in 2015. The application of ICTs in LIS practice and education, too, has emerged as a prominent topic in the field. These issues have the potential of shaping or have shaped the LIS curriculum in some LIS schools in the continent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akhavan P, Ale Ebrahim N, Fetrati MA, Pezeshkan A. Major trends in knowledge management research: a bibliometric study. Scientometrics. 2016;107(3):1249–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1938-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bar-Ilan J, Peritz BC. Evolution, continuity, and disappearance of documents on a specific topic on the Web: a longitudinal study of ‘informetrics’. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2004;55(11):980–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bornmann L, Mutz R. Growth rates of modern science: a bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2015;66(11): 2215–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Callon M, Law J, Rip A. Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: sociology of science in the real world. London: The Macmillan Press; 1986.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Chang YW, Huang MH, Lin CW. Evolution of research subjects in library and information science based on keyword, bibliographic coupling, and co-citation analyses. Scientometrics. 2015;105:2071–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1762-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen G, Xiao L, Hu C-P, Zhao X-Q. Identifying the research focus of Library and Information Science institutions in China with institution-specific keywords. Scientometrics. 2015;103(2):707–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Craighead CW, Meredith J. Operations management research: evolution and alternative future paths. Int J Oper Prod Manag. 2008;28(8):710–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. De Granda Orive JI, García Río F, Roig Vázquez F, Escobar Sacristán J, Gutiérrez Jiménez T, Callol Sánchez L. Key words, essential tools for bibliographic research: analysis of usage in Archivos de Bronconeumología for respiratory system knowledge areas. Arch Bronconeumol. 2005;41(2):78–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Estabrook L. Library and information science. In: Bates MJ, Maack MN, editors. Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. London: Taylor & Francis; 2010. pp. 3287–3292. https://doi.org/10.1081/e-elis3-120044044.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ferreira MP, Reis NR, Miranda R. Thirty years of entrepreneurship research published in top journals: analysis of citations, co-citations and themes. J Glob Entrep Res. 2015;5(17):1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40497-015-0035-6.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Finardi U. On the time evolution of received citations, in different scientific fields: an empirical study. J Informetr. 2014;8(1):13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Garcia-Garcia P, Lopez-Munoz F, Callejo J, Martin-Agueda B, Alamo C. Evolution of Spanish scientific production in international obstetrics and gynecology journals during the period 1986–2002. J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005;123:150–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Goldfinch S, Yamamoto K. Prometheus assessed: research measurement, peer review, and citation analysis. Oxford: Chandos Publishing; 2012.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Gu Y. Global knowledge management research: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics. 2004;61(2):171–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hayes RM. Library automation: history. In: Bates MJ, Maack MN, editors. Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. London: Taylor & Francis; 2010. pp. 3326–3337. https://doi.org/10.1081/e-elis3-120044024.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hori A. Bibliometric overview of library and information science research productivity in Iran. J Educ Libr Inf Sci. 2004;45(1):15–25.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Huang MH, Chang YW. A comparative study of interdisciplinary changes between information science and library science. Scientometrics. 2012;91:789–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jarvelin K, Vakkari P. The evolution of library and information science 1965–1985: a content analysis of journal articles. Inf Process Manag. 1993;29(1):129–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ke Q, Ferrara E, Radicchi F, Flammini A. Defining and identifying sleeping beauties in science. PNAS. 2015;112(24):7426–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Khan GF, Wood J. Information technology management domain: emerging themes and keyword analysis. Scientometrics. 2015;105:959–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Li N. Evolutionary patterns of national disciplinary profiles in research: 1996–2015. Scientometrics. 2017;111(1):493–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lin J, Fenner M. Altmetrics in evolution: defining and redefining the ontology of article-level metrics. Inf Stand Q. 2013;25(2):20–6.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Liu P, Wu Q, Mu X, Yu K, Guo Y. Detecting the intellectual structure of library and information science based on formal concept analysis. Scientometrics. 2015;104:737–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Marshakova-Shaikevich I. Bibliometric maps of field of science. Inf Process Manag. 2005;41:1534–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Neveol A, Dogan RI, Lu Z. Author keywords in biomedical journal articles. In: AMIA annual symposium proceedings. 2010. pp. 537–541. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3041277/pdf/amia-2010_sympproc_0537.pdf. Retrieved 10 Jan 2017.

  26. Neylon C, Wu S. Article-level metrics and the evolution of scientific impact. PLoS Biol. 2009;7(11):e1000242. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Onyancha OB, Majanja MK. LIS education: sub-Saharan Africa. In: Abdullahi I, editor. Global library and information science: a textbook for students and educators. Munchen: K. G. Saur Verlag; 2009. p. 108–32.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Singh N. Internet: importance and usage for library and information professionals. DESIDOC Bull Inf Technol. 2001;21(3):17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Strupp HH. Psychotherapy research: evolution and current trends. In: Fagan TK, VandenBos GR, editors. Exploring applied psychology: origins and critical analyses. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association; 1993. p. 157–93.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Sun X, Kaur J, Milojevic S, Flammini A, Menczer F. Social dynamics of science. Sci Rep. 2013;3:1069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Swanson EB. Information systems. In: Bates MJ, Maack MN, editors. Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. London: Taylor & Francis; 2010. pp. 2635–2642. https://doi.org/10.1081/e-elis3-120043700.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Thelwall M. Introduction to webometrics: quantitative web research for the social sciences, vol. 1, no. 1., Synthesis Lectures on information concepts, retrieval, and servicesSan Rafael: Morgan & Clayton; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Thelwall M, Price L. Language evolution and the spread of ideas: a procedure for identifying emergent hybrid word family members. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2006;57(10):1326–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tuomaala O, Jarvelin K, Vakkari P. Evolution of library and information science, 1965–2014: content analysis of journal articles. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2014;65(7):1446–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. White HD. Bibliometric overview of information science. In: Bates MJ, Maack MN, editors. Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. London: Taylor & Francis; 2010. pp. 534–545. https://doi.org/10.1081/e-elis3-120044527.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Yang S, Han R, Wolfram D, Zhao Y. Visualizing the intellectual structure of information science (2006–2015): introducing author keyword coupling analysis. J Informetr. 2016;10:132–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Yi S, Choi J. The organization of scientific knowledge: the structural characteristics of keyword networks. Scientometrics. 2012;90:1015–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0560-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zitt M, Bassecoulard E. Development of a method for detection and trend analysis of research fronts built by lexical or cocitation analysis. Scientometrics. 1994;30(1):333–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information Science, University of South Africa, Unisa, PO Box 392, Pretoria, 0003, South Africa

    Omwoyo Bosire Onyancha

Authors
  1. Omwoyo Bosire Onyancha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Omwoyo Bosire Onyancha.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Onyancha, O.B. Forty-Five Years of LIS Research Evolution, 1971–2015: An Informetrics Study of the Author-Supplied Keywords. Pub Res Q 34, 456–470 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-018-9590-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-018-9590-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation