Publishing Research Quarterly

, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 19–27 | Cite as

Augmenting Reality in Books: A Tool for Enhancing Reading Skills in Mexico



Data suggests there is a global reduction in the number of readers, and a decreasing amount of time spent on reading. The primary reasons for this falling performance is due to the lack of time to read and the lack of motivation. Augmented reality has a promising potential to increase literacy because it fosters cognitive attainment and has a positive impact on overall learning effectiveness. Augmented technology contributes to increasing engagement, invites participation, and develops appreciation of the context. Augmented books are proposed to incentivize curiosity, facilitate the interpretation of text and illustrations, and provide a learning tool that relates to the reader. The Mexican national textbook publishing program has an unparalleled opportunity to improve educational outcomes since augmented reality provides complementary digital learning experiences to the printed content giving readers the advantage of two media. Net result: increased literacy, deeper learning.


Augmented reality Augmented books Learning Literacy Motivation Technology 


  1. 1.
    Abbruzzese Eric. Augmented reality on the rise with total market worth to reach $100 billion by 2020. Arizona: Scottsdale; 2015.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anzures T. El Libro De Texto Gratuito En La Actualidad: Logros Y Retos De Un Programa Cincuentenario. Revista Mexicana De Investigacion Educativa. 2011;16(49):363.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Azuma Ronald T. A survey of augmented reality. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ. 1997;6(4):355–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bank W. Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years. Washington: World Bank; 2015.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bau O, Poupyrev I. REVEL: tactile feedback technology for augmented reality. ACM Trans Gr. 2012;31(4):89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bellini H, Chen W, Sygiyama M, Shin M, Alam S Takayama D. Virtual & augmented reality: understanding the race for the next computing platform, 2016.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Billinghurst M, Kato H, Poupyrev I. The magic book: moving seamlessly between reality and virtuality. IEEE Comput Gr Appl. 2001;21(3):6–8.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Billinghurst Mark. Augmented reality in education: current technologies and the potential for education. Proc - Soc Behav Sci. 2012;47:297–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Billinghurst Mark, Duenser Andreas. Augmented reality in the classroom. Computer. 2012;45(7):56–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Branch RM. Instructional design: the ADDIE approach. Berlin: Springer; 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Caudell TP, Mizell DW. Augmented reality: an application of heads-up display technology to manual manufacturing processes. IEEE; 1992.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cheng KH, Tsai CC. Children and parents reading of an augmented reality picture book: analyses of behavioral patterns and cognitive attainment. Comput Educ. 2014;72:302–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Clark A, Dunser A. An interactive augmented reality coloring book. In: 3DUI 2012: IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces. Costa Mesa, CA: IEEE Computer Society; 2012.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Conaliteg. A 57 anos de la entrega del primer libro de texto gratuito. Accessed 25 Jan 2017.
  15. 15.
    Craig AB. Understanding augmented reality: concepts and applications. Burlington: Morgan Kaufmann; 2013.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Delaney Tim, Madigan Tim. Leasons learned from popular culture. Albany: State University of New York Press; 2016.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gaudiosi J. How augmented reality and virtual reality will generate $150 billion in revenue by 2020. Fortune Magazine; April 15, 2015.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Grasset R, Dünser A, Billinghurst M. Edutainment with a mixed reality book: a visually augmented illustrative childrens’ book. ACM; 2008.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hale KS, Stanney KM. Handbook of virtual environments: design, implementation, and applications. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2012.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Harris LR, Davidson CR, Aprile KT. Understanding teacher aides’ definitions of reading: implications for classroom practice. Aust Edu Res. 2015;42(5):627–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hernandez Luna J. Historia De Conaliteg. Mexico: Universidad Michaocana de San Nicolas de Hidalgo; 1986.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hincapie M, Caponio A, Rios H, Mendivil EG. An introduction to augmented reality with applications in aeronautical maintenance. In: 13th international conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON); June 2011.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Huysmans F, De Haan J, van den Broek P. Behind the scenes: a quarter century of reading, listening, watching and internet use. The Hague: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau; 2004.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ibanez MB, Di Serio A, Villarana D, Kloos CD. Experimenting with electromagnetism using augmented reality: impact on flow student experience and educational effectiveness. Comput Educ. 2014;71:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    INEGI. Modolo De Lectura (Molec) Principales Resultados Febrero 2016. Mexico; 2016.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jerald J. The VR book: human-centered design for virtual reality. San Rafael: Morgan & Claypool Publishers; 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Joan Robert. Enhancing education through mobile augmented reality. J Edu Technol. 2015;11(4):8–14.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kipper Gregory, Rampolla Joseph. Augmented reality. Walthman: Syngress; 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Layne S. Igniting a passion for reading: successful strategies for building lifetime readers. Stenhouse; 2009.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Liao Tony. Is it, “augmented reality”? contesting boundary work over the definitions and organizing visions for an emerging technology across field-configuring events. Inf Organ. 2016;26(3):45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lim C, Park T. Exploring the educational use of an augmented reality books. In: 34th annual meeting of the Conferenceon College Compositionand Communication; 2010.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lommen Mathieu. The book of books: 500 years of graphic innovation. London: Thames & Hudson; 2012.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mackay K. Does an ipad change the experience? a look at mother-child book reading interactions. 2015.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Margolis T. Immersive art in augmented reality. In: Geroimenko V, editor. Springer series on cultural computing. Berlin: Springer; 2014.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Martin Sergio, Diaz Gabriel, Sancristobal Elio, Gil Rosario, Castro Manuel, Peire Juan. New technology trends in education: seven years of forecasts and convergence. Comput Educ. 2011;57(3):1893–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    McKalin V. Augmented reality vs. virtual reality: What are the differences and similarities? Tech Times; 2014.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Merel Tim, Tong James. Augmented/virtual reality report Q3 2015. CA: Menlo Park; 2016.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Netten Andrea, Voeten Marinus, Droop Mienk, Verhoevene Ludo. Sociocultural and educational factors for reading literacy decline in the Netherlands in the past decade. Lear Individ Differ. 2014;32:9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Normand J-M, Servieres M, Moreau G. A new typology of augmented reality applications; 2012.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    OECD. Pisa. Paris, France; 2010.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Price Sara, Rogers Ivonne. Let’s get physical: the learning benefits of interacting in digitally augmented physical spaces. Comput Educ. 2004;43(1–2):137–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rodgers C. Augmented reality books and the reading motivation of fourth-grade students; 2014.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sharma Prabha. Augmented reality: its applications and use of wireless technologies. Int J Inf Comput Technol. 2014;4(3):231–8.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sheehy Kieron, Ferguson Rebecca, Gill C. Augmented education: bringing real and virtual learning together. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Shih H-C. A study on the markerless augmented reality for picture books; 2013.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Stoller Fredricka L, Anderson Neil J, Grabe William, Komiyama Reiko. Instructional enhancements to improve students’ reading abilities. Engl Teach Forum. 2013;1:2–33.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Barber Taboada, Ana M. Reading to learn for ELs: motivation practices and comprehension strategies for informational texts. London: Heinemann; 2016.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    UNESCO. Education; 1945.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    UNESCO. Literacy for life; 2006.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    van der Welde, Ernst O. The future of ebooks? Will print disappear? an end-user Perspective. Library Hi Tech. 2009; 27(4):570-583.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Verhoeven L, Snow CE. Literacy and motivation: reading engagement in individuals and groups. New York: Routledge; 2001.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Vicenzi D, Valimont B, Opalenik C, Macchiarella N, Gangadharan SN, Majoros AE. The effectiveness of cognitive elaboration using augmented reality as a training and learning paradigm. In Annual meeting of the human factors and ergonomics society; 2003.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Villa Lever L. Cincuenta Anos De La Comision Nacional De Libros Gratuitos: Cambios Y Permanencias En La Educacion Mexicana. Mexico DF: Comision Nacional de Libros de Texto Gratuitos, 2009.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Wigfield A, Guthrie J. Motivation for reading: individual, home, textual, and classroom perspectives: a special issue of educational psychologist. New York: Routledge; 1997.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Winch G, Johnston R, March P, Ljungdahl L, Holliday M. Literacy: reading, writing and children’s literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Yilmaz Rabia M. Are augmented reality picture books magic or real for preschool children aged five to six? Br J Edu Technol. 2016;45(7):56–63.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Yuen S, Yaoyuneyong G, Johnson E. Augmented reality: an overview and five directions for AR in Education. J Edu Technol Dev Exch. 2011;4(1):119–40.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.WynnewoodUSA

Personalised recommendations