Skip to main content

The Complexity of Measuring the Impact of Books

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to discover whether there are scholarly evaluation metrics that can be applied to a wide range of books’ types and contents. We analyzed over 70,000 books and collected various metrics per each title including traditional and altmetrics measures. The analysis in this paper depicts the top books showing the highest rates of citations, reviews, readership, downloads, twitter and more. Our results show that books display different impact in each of the measurements and vary by types and content. There isn’t one measure that captures the impact of books across the board. We conclude that books should be evaluated by types and contents while using different measures per each.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

References

  1. Beatty S. Scopus surpasses 120,000 indexed book titles!. 2016. Retrieved from http://blog.scopus.com/posts/scopus-surpasses-120000-indexed-book-titles.

  2. Cronin B, Snyder H, Atkins H. Comparative citation rankings of authors in monographic and journal literature: a study of sociology. J Doc. 1997;53(3):263–73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dyas E. Scopus content update: books expansion project. 2014. Retrieved from http://blog.scopus.com/posts/scopus-content-update-books-expansion-project.

  4. Elsevier. Journal Metrics from Elsevier. 2016. Retrieved from http://www.journalmetrics.com/.

  5. Garfield E. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science. 1972;178(4060):471–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. González-Pereira B, Guerrero-Bote VP, Moya-Anegón F. A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: the SJR indicator. J Informetr. 2010;4(3):379–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.03.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kousha K, Thelwall M. Can Amazon.com reviews help to assess the wider impacts of books? J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2016;67(3):566–81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Moed HF. Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals. J Informetr. 2010;4(3):265–77. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.01.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Priem J, Taraborelli D, Groth P, Neylon C. Altmetrics: a manifesto. 2010. Retrieved from http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/.

  10. Thomson Reuters. Book Citation Index. 2016. Retrieved from http://thomsonreuters.com/en/products-services/scholarly-scientific-research/scholarly-search-and-discovery/book-citation-index.html.

  11. Torres-Salinas D, Rodríguez-Sánchez R, Robinson-García N, Fdez-Valdivia J, García JA. Mapping citation patterns of book chapters in the Book Citation Index. J Informetr. 2013;7(2):412–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.01.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. White HD, Boell SK, Yu H, Davis M, Wilson CS, Cole FTH. Libcitations: a measure for comparative assessment of book publications in the humanities and social sciences. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol. 2009;60(6):1083–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Gali Halevi or Barnaby Nicolas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Halevi, G., Nicolas, B. & Bar-Ilan, J. The Complexity of Measuring the Impact of Books. Pub Res Q 32, 187–200 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-016-9464-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-016-9464-5

Keywords

  • Books
  • Metrics
  • Scholarly impact
  • Altmetrics