Abstract
The purpose of this study was to discover whether there are scholarly evaluation metrics that can be applied to a wide range of books’ types and contents. We analyzed over 70,000 books and collected various metrics per each title including traditional and altmetrics measures. The analysis in this paper depicts the top books showing the highest rates of citations, reviews, readership, downloads, twitter and more. Our results show that books display different impact in each of the measurements and vary by types and content. There isn’t one measure that captures the impact of books across the board. We conclude that books should be evaluated by types and contents while using different measures per each.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beatty S. Scopus surpasses 120,000 indexed book titles!. 2016. Retrieved from http://blog.scopus.com/posts/scopus-surpasses-120000-indexed-book-titles.
Cronin B, Snyder H, Atkins H. Comparative citation rankings of authors in monographic and journal literature: a study of sociology. J Doc. 1997;53(3):263–73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007200.
Dyas E. Scopus content update: books expansion project. 2014. Retrieved from http://blog.scopus.com/posts/scopus-content-update-books-expansion-project.
Elsevier. Journal Metrics from Elsevier. 2016. Retrieved from http://www.journalmetrics.com/.
Garfield E. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science. 1972;178(4060):471–9.
González-Pereira B, Guerrero-Bote VP, Moya-Anegón F. A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: the SJR indicator. J Informetr. 2010;4(3):379–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.03.002.
Kousha K, Thelwall M. Can Amazon.com reviews help to assess the wider impacts of books? J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2016;67(3):566–81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23404.
Moed HF. Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals. J Informetr. 2010;4(3):265–77. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.01.002.
Priem J, Taraborelli D, Groth P, Neylon C. Altmetrics: a manifesto. 2010. Retrieved from http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/.
Thomson Reuters. Book Citation Index. 2016. Retrieved from http://thomsonreuters.com/en/products-services/scholarly-scientific-research/scholarly-search-and-discovery/book-citation-index.html.
Torres-Salinas D, Rodríguez-Sánchez R, Robinson-García N, Fdez-Valdivia J, García JA. Mapping citation patterns of book chapters in the Book Citation Index. J Informetr. 2013;7(2):412–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.01.004.
White HD, Boell SK, Yu H, Davis M, Wilson CS, Cole FTH. Libcitations: a measure for comparative assessment of book publications in the humanities and social sciences. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol. 2009;60(6):1083–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21045.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Halevi, G., Nicolas, B. & Bar-Ilan, J. The Complexity of Measuring the Impact of Books. Pub Res Q 32, 187–200 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-016-9464-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-016-9464-5