Advertisement

Publishing Research Quarterly

, Volume 32, Issue 3, pp 187–200 | Cite as

The Complexity of Measuring the Impact of Books

  • Gali HaleviEmail author
  • Barnaby NicolasEmail author
  • Judit Bar-Ilan
Article

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to discover whether there are scholarly evaluation metrics that can be applied to a wide range of books’ types and contents. We analyzed over 70,000 books and collected various metrics per each title including traditional and altmetrics measures. The analysis in this paper depicts the top books showing the highest rates of citations, reviews, readership, downloads, twitter and more. Our results show that books display different impact in each of the measurements and vary by types and content. There isn’t one measure that captures the impact of books across the board. We conclude that books should be evaluated by types and contents while using different measures per each.

Keywords

Books Metrics Scholarly impact Altmetrics 

References

  1. 1.
    Beatty S. Scopus surpasses 120,000 indexed book titles!. 2016. Retrieved from http://blog.scopus.com/posts/scopus-surpasses-120000-indexed-book-titles.
  2. 2.
    Cronin B, Snyder H, Atkins H. Comparative citation rankings of authors in monographic and journal literature: a study of sociology. J Doc. 1997;53(3):263–73. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000007200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dyas E. Scopus content update: books expansion project. 2014. Retrieved from http://blog.scopus.com/posts/scopus-content-update-books-expansion-project.
  4. 4.
    Elsevier. Journal Metrics from Elsevier. 2016. Retrieved from http://www.journalmetrics.com/.
  5. 5.
    Garfield E. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science. 1972;178(4060):471–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    González-Pereira B, Guerrero-Bote VP, Moya-Anegón F. A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: the SJR indicator. J Informetr. 2010;4(3):379–91. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.03.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kousha K, Thelwall M. Can Amazon.com reviews help to assess the wider impacts of books? J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2016;67(3):566–81. doi: 10.1002/asi.23404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moed HF. Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals. J Informetr. 2010;4(3):265–77. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.01.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Priem J, Taraborelli D, Groth P, Neylon C. Altmetrics: a manifesto. 2010. Retrieved from http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/.
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Torres-Salinas D, Rodríguez-Sánchez R, Robinson-García N, Fdez-Valdivia J, García JA. Mapping citation patterns of book chapters in the Book Citation Index. J Informetr. 2013;7(2):412–24. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2013.01.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    White HD, Boell SK, Yu H, Davis M, Wilson CS, Cole FTH. Libcitations: a measure for comparative assessment of book publications in the humanities and social sciences. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol. 2009;60(6):1083–96. doi: 10.1002/asi.21045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Information ScienceBar-Ilan UniversityRamat GanIsrael

Personalised recommendations