Globalization and the internet are intrinsically linked. This obvious fact has major implications for how the publishing industry will be modified in the foreseeable future. This change may be technologically driven but there is a place for intellectual debate about the appropriate regulation of the field. This requires an examination of the commercial and moral claims of the authors or creators and the conventional publishers vis a vis those of the end users both nationally and internationally. This analysis will enable me to make an argument about the importance of open access as an appropriate governance mechanism for both protection and distribution of information in the international arena. In addition, this paper argues that in a globalized world justice and social cohesion requires commercial Multinational corporations (MNCs) to act responsibly and ethically. Most of the big publishing houses are such MNCs and if open access repositories (OARs) are to be relevant such publishing houses will have to embrace the concept. Overall, I will use the concept of corporate social responsibility to make the argument that it is logical and feasible that publishing MNCs can modify their business practices and adopt OARs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
See also Jean Burgess and Joshua Green, YouTube: online video and participatory culture (John Wiley & Sons, 2013); Catherine Dwyer, Starr Roxanne Hiltz and Katia Passerini, ‘Trust and privacy concern within social networking sites: a comparison of Facebook and MySpace’, AMCIS (2007) http://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1849&context=amcis2007&sei-redir=1&referer=http%3A%2F%2Fscholar.google.com.au%2Fscholar%3Fhl%3Den%26q%3Dfacebook%26btnG%3D%26as_sdt%3D1%252C5%26as_sdtp%3D#search=%22facebook%22; Takeshi Sakaki, Makoto Okazaki and Yutaka Matsuo, ‘Earthquake shakes Twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors’, Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World Wide Web (ACM, 2010) 851 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1772690.1772777.
Andersen B. If “intellectual property rights” is the answer, what is the question? Revisiting the patent controversies. Econ Innov New Technol. 2004;13:417.
Archibugi D, Filippetti A. The globalization of intellectual property rights: four learned lessons and four theses (May 2010). http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/21930/
Balkin JM. The future of free expression in a digital age (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 1335055, Social Science Research Network, 29 January 2009). http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1335055
Chang HJ. Kicking away the ladder: development strategy in historical perspective. 1st ed. London: Anthem Press; 2002.
Chantavaridou E. Open access and institutional repositories in Greece: progress so far. OCLC Syst Serv Int Digit Libr Perspect. 2009;25:47.
Finch J. Accessibility, sustainability, excellence: how to expand access to research publications (Report of the Working Group on Expanding Access to Published Research Findings, 2012). http://www.researchinfonet.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Finch-Group-report-FINAL-VERSION.pdf
Kingsley D. Busting the top five myths about open access publishing. The conversation. 2013. http://theconversation.com/busting-the-top-five-myths-about-open-access-publishing-14792
Koutras N, Bottis M. Institutional repositories of open access: a paradigm of innovation and changing in educational politics. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2013;106:1499.
Lawrence L. Free culture: the nature and future of creativity. Baltimore: Penguin Books; 2005.
Poynder R. Open and shut? Open access: springer tightens rules on self-archiving. http://poynder.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/open-access-springer-tightens-rules-on.html
Prosser DC. From here to there: a proposed mechanism for transforming journals from closed to open access. Learn Publ. 2003;16:163.
Reeves C. The Wellcome Trust, eLS. Wiley; 2001. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9780470015902.a0003554/abstract
Samuelson P. Toward a “new deal” for copyright in an information age. Mich Law Rev. 2002;100:1488.
Sell SK. Private power, public law: the globalization of intellectual property rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003.
Suber P. Nine questions for hybrid journal programs. http://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/4552044
The House of Lords Science and Technology Committee. Lack of clarity over open access is ‘unacceptable’—RCUK must clarify and monitor its implementation closely—News from Parliament. UK Parliament. 2013. http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/lords-select/science-and-technology-committee/news/open-access-report-published/
The House of Lords Science and Technology Committee. Science and technology committee (Lords). UK Parliament. 2013. http://www.parliament.uk/hlscience
Willinsky J. The nine flavors of open access scholarly publishing. J Postgrad Med. 2003;49:263.
Willinsky J. The access principle: the case for open access to research and scholarship. Cambridge: The MIT Press; 2005.
Willinsky J. The unacknowledged convergence of open source, open access, and open science. First Monday. 2005;10. http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1265
About this article
Cite this article
Koutras, N. The Open Access in the Context of the Globalizing World. Pub Res Q 31, 132–141 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-015-9403-x
- Intellectual property
- Open access