Advertisement

Publishing Research Quarterly

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 63–76 | Cite as

German Book Publishers’ Barriers to Disruptive Innovations: The Case of E-Book Adoption

  • Christopher BuschowEmail author
  • Isabelle Nölle
  • Beate Schneider
Article
  • 681 Downloads

Abstract

To succeed in a period of change, German book publishers need to adopt innovations, e.g., implement e-books into their product portfolio. Yet, in the book industry, the adoption of new technologies is not commonplace: Despite being the second biggest book market worldwide, only 1.2 % of all published books in Germany are available as e-books. This problem leads us to investigate the factors that determine whether publishing companies decide in favor or against entering the e-book market. Based on a standardized survey of more than 240 German publishing houses, barriers to innovation adoption are examined from a micro, meso and macro perspective. Our main findings show that individual characteristics of management and the company’s corporate culture strongly predict adoption. Also, organizational communication seems to be critical. Taking this into account, the key resource to enable innovation seems to be information underlining the necessity of communities of practice.

Keywords

Adoption Corporate culture Creative disruption German book publishing industry E-books Innovation Management survey Organizational structure 

References

  1. 1.
    Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1980.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amazon (ed) (2010). Amazon.com now selling more Kindle books than print books. Retrieved October 26, 2011, from http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=176060&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1565581&highlight.
  3. 3.
    Bantel KA, Jackson SE. Top management and innovations in banking: does the composition of the top management team make a difference? Strateg Manag J. 1989;10(1):107–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Börsenverein des Deutschen Buchhandels & GfK Panel Services Deutschland (2011) Umbruch auf dem Buchmarkt? Das E-Book in Deutschland. Retrieved March 19, 2012, from http://www.boersenverein.de/sixcms/media.php/976/E-Book-Studie_2011.pdf.
  5. 5.
    Börsenverein des Deutschen Buchhandels. Buch und Buchhandel in Zahlen 2011. Frankfurt/M: Börsenverein des Deutschen Buchhandels; 2011.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bower JL, Christensen CM. Disruptive technologies: catching the wave. Harvard Business Rev. 1995;73(1):43–54.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brown TA. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford; 2006.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Buchreport (2011) Nachholbedarf im Netz. Retrieved March 19, 2012 from http://www.buchreport.de/nachrichten/handel/handel_nachricht/datum/2011/07/08/nachholbedarf-im-netz.htm.
  9. 9.
    Christensen CM. The innovator’s solution: creating and sustaining successful growth. 18th ed. Boston: Harvard Business Press; 2003.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Coleman JS. Foundations of social theory. Boston: Harvard University Press; 1994.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cope B, Phillips A. The future of the book in the digital age. In: Cope B, Phillips A, editors. The future of the book in the digital age. Oxford: Chandos; 2006. p. 1–19.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Daft RL, Murphy J, Willmott H. Organization theory and design. Hampshire: Cengage Learning; 2010.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dal Zotto C, van Kranenburg H, editors. Management and innovation in the media. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2008.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Damanpour F, Schneider M. Phases of the adoption of innovation in organizations: effects of environment, organization and top managers. Br J Manag. 2006;17(3):215–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Damanpour F, Schneider M. Characteristics of innovation and innovation adoption in public organizations: assessing the role of managers. J Public Adm Res Theor. 2008;19(3):495–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Damanpour F, Wischnevsky JD. Research on organizational innovation: distinguishing innovation-generating from innovation-adopting organizations. J Eng Tech Manage. 2006;23(4):269–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Deuze M, editor. Managing media work. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2011.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Eisenstein E. The printing press as an agent of change: communications and cultural transformations in early modern Europe. 2nd ed. Cambridge: University Press; 1979.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Elliott R, Jobber D, Sharp J. Using the theory of reasoned action to understand organizational behavior: the role of belief salience. Br J Psychol. 1995;34(2):161–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fennel ML. Synergy, influence, and information in the adoption of administrative innovations. Acad Manag J. 1984;27(1):113–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Festinger L. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston: Row, Peterson; 1957.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Giddens A. The constitution of society. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1984.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Goldsmith RE, Hofacker CF. Measuring consumer innovativeness. J Acad Mark Sci. 1991;19(3):209–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Greco AN. The book publishing industry. 2nd ed. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2009.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Greco AN, Rodriguez CE, Wharton RM. The culture and commerce of publishing in the 21st century. Stanford: Stanford Business; 2007.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Greer CF, Ferguson DA. Factors influencing the adoption of HD radio™ by local radio station managers. Int J Media Manag. 2008;10(4):148–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Haller C (2003). Verhaltenstheoretischer Ansatz für ein Management von Innovationsprozessen. Retrieved January 27, 2014, from http://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/opus/volltexte/2004/1580/pdf/Dissertation_Christine_Haller.pdf.
  28. 28.
    Harrington D. Confirmatory factor analysis. New York, Oxford: University Press; 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hartley P, Bruckmann CG. Business communication. London, New York: Routledge; 2002.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Heng S, Heymann E, Müller M (2010) Verlage im Umbruch. Digitalisierung mischt Karten neu. Deutsche Bank Research Paper. Retrieved March 19, 2012, from http://www.dbresearch.de/PROD/DBR_INTERNET_DE-PROD/PROD0000000000262885.pdf.
  31. 31.
    House E. Challenges facing the UK book industry. Publ Res Q. 2013;29(3):211–9. doi: 10.1007/s12109-013-9320-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jung J, Chan-Olmsted S, Park B, Kim Y. Factors affecting e-book reader awareness, interest, and intention to use. New Media Soc. 2012;14(2):204–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Keysberg G. Die Anwendung der Diskriminanzanalyse zur statistischen Kreditwürdigkeitsprüfung im Konsumentenkreditgeschäft. Cologne: Müller Botermann; 1989.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kimberly JR, Evanisko MJ. Organizational innovation: the influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Acad Manag J. 1981;24(4):679–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kimberly JR. Hospital innovation adoption: the role of integration into external informational environments. J Health Soc Behav. 1978;19(4):361–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    King N. Innovation at work: the research literature. In: West MA, Farr JL, editors. Innovation and creativity at work. New York: Wiley; 1990. p. 15–59.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kirton JM. Adaptors and innovators: a description and measure. J Appl Psychol. 1976;61(5):622–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kirton JM. Adoption-innovation in the context of diversity and change. London: Routledge; 2003.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    König A. Cognitive framing and incumbent inertia in response to technological discontinuities. Berlin: Pro Business; 2009.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kotter JP. Leading change: why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Rev. 1995;73(2):59–67.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Küng L. Strategic management in the media. London: Sage; 2008.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lavine JM, Wackman DB. Managing media organizations: effective leadership of the media. New York: Longman; 1988.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Licher V. The book industry in Germany: looking back at 2009. Publ Res Q. 2010;26(1):46–50. doi: 10.1007/s12109-010-9150-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Licher V. Looking back at 2010: the book industry in Germany still trying to find its way into digitization. Publ Res Q. 2011;27(1):83–7. doi: 10.1007/s12109-011-9199-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Licher V. Trade book publishing in Germany: summary report for 2011. Publ Res Q. 2012;28(2):130–4. doi: 10.1007/s12109-012-9259-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Marcati A, Guido G, Peluso A. The role of SME entrepreneurs’ innovativeness and personality in the adoption of innovations. Res Policy. 2008;37(9):1579–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    March JG, Sutton RI. Organizational performance as a dependent variable. Organ Sci. 1997;8(6):697–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Martin B, Tian X. Books, bytes and business: the promise of digital publishing. Farnham: Ashgate; 2010.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    McKinsey & Company (eds) (2010) What successful transformations share: McKinsey Global Survey results. Retrieved March 19, 2012, from http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/What_successful_transformations_share_McKinsey_Global_Survey_results_2550.
  50. 50.
    McLachlan GJ. Discriminant analysis and statistical pattern recognition. Hoboken: Wiley; 2004.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Mierzejewska BI. “Barbarians at the gate”—disruptive innovation and book publishing. In: Wunderlich W, Schmid B, editors. Die Zukunft der Gutenberg-Galaxis. Haupt: Bern et al.; 2008. p. 99–116.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Mierzejewska BI. Responding to disruptive innovations in book publishing—threat or opportunities? Int J Book. 2010;7(2):51–60.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Müller C, Spiegel S, Ullrich F. E-books in deutschland: der beginn einer neuen gutenberg-Ära?. Düsseldorf: PriceWaterhouseCoopers; 2010.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Mussinelli C. Digital publishing in Europe: a focus on France, Germany, Italy and Spain. Publ Res Q. 2010;26(3):168–75. doi: 10.1007/s12109-010-9172-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Oestreicher K, Kuzma J, Walton N, editors. Sailing against the wind of creative destruction: the attack of radical innovation on the home entertainment industry. Saarbruecken: Lambert Academic; 2011.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Osgood CE, Suci GJ, Tannenbaum PH. The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois; 1957.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Porter ME. Competitive strategy. New York: Free Press; 1980.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Richard K. Miller & Associates. The 2011 entertainment, media and advertising market research handbook. Loganville: Richard K Miller & Associates; 2011.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Rogers EM, Shoemaker FF. Communication of innovations: a cross-cultural approach. New York: Free Press; 1971.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press; 2003.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Schein EH. Organizational culture and leadership. 4th ed. San Francisco: Wiley; 2010.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Schumpeter JA. The creative response in economic history. J Econ Hist. 1947;7(2):149–59.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Scott SG, Bruce RA. Determinants of innovative behavior: a path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Acad Manag J. 1994;37(3):580–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Thompson JB. Books in the digital age: the transformation of academic and higher education publishing in Britain and the United States. Cambridge: Polity; 2005.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003;27(3):425–78.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Weick KE. Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1995.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Wejnert B. Integrating models of diffusion of innovations: a conceptual framework. Ann Rev Sociol. 2002;28(1):297–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Wenger E. Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: University Press; 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    West MA, Anderson NR. Innovation in top management teams. J Appl Psychol. 1996;81(6):680–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Whittington R. Putting Giddens into action: social systems and managerial agency. J Manage Stud. 1992;29(6):693–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Wildemuth BM. An empirically grounded model of the adoption of intellectual technologies. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 1992;43(3):210–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Wilking T. Marktübersicht und Marktentwicklung. In: Clement M, editor. Ökonomie der Buchindustrie: herausforderungen in der Buchbranche erfolgreich managen. Wiesbaden: Gabler; 2009. p. 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Wünderlich NV. Acceptance of remote services—perception, adoption and continued usage in organizational settings. Wiesbaden: Gabler; 2009.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Zaltman G, Duncan R, Holbeck J. Innovations and organizations. Malabar: Robert E. Krieger; 1984.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Ziv ND. New media as catalysts for change in the transformation of the book publishing industry. Int J Media Manag. 2002;4(2):66–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher Buschow
    • 1
    Email author
  • Isabelle Nölle
    • 2
  • Beate Schneider
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Journalism and Communication ResearchHanover University of Music, Drama and MediaHanoverGermany
  2. 2.Ullstein Buchverlage GmbHBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations