Advertisement

Publishing Research Quarterly

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 126–134 | Cite as

The E-Reader as Replacement for the Print Newspaper

  • Barry A. HollanderEmail author
  • Dean M. Krugman
  • Tom Reichert
  • J. Adam Avant
Article

Abstract

This study examines the effects of a major metropolitan newspaper’s withdrawal from a city and whether an e-reader pre-loaded with a digital subscription to the newspaper would act as a replacement. In-depth interviews with 20 former readers of the newspaper found the device, the Kindle DX, to be generally liked for its readability but a poor substitute for the published version of the newspaper.

Keywords

Circulation Demographics E-readers Kindle Mobile technology Newspapers Smart phones Subscribers 

References

  1. 1.
    Plambeck J. Newspaper circulation falls nearly 9%. New York Times, April 27, 2010, Sect. B, p. 2.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pew Project for Excellence in Journalism, The State of the News Media 2010, http://www.stateofthemedia.org/2010/newspapers_audience.php (August 15, 2010). Accessed 25 Nov 2010.
  3. 3.
    Meyer P. The vanishing newspaper. 2nd ed. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press; 2009.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Peiser W. Cohort replacement and the downward trend in newspaper readership. Newsp Res J. 2000;21(1):11–22.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Picard RG. Cash cows or entrecote: publishing companies and disruptive technologies. Trends Commun. 2003;11(2):127–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Picard RG. Capital crisis in profitable newspaper industry. Neiman Reports. 2006;60(4):10–2.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lain LB. Steps toward a comprehensive model of newspaper readership. Journalism Q. 1986;63(1):69–74,122.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Malthouse EC, Calder BJ. Demographics of newspaper readership: predictors and patterns of U.S. consumption. J Media Bus Stud. 2006;3(1):17.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cranberg G. Trimming the fringe: how newspapers shun low-income readers. Columbia Journalism Rev. 1997(March/April):52.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Berelson B. What ‘missing the newspaper’ means,”. In: Lazarsfeld PF, Stanton FN, editors. Communications research, 1948–1949. New York: Harper & Broters; 1949. p. 111–2.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bentley C. No newspaper is no fun—even five decades later. Newsp Res J. 2001;22(4):2–15.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lacy S, Martin HJ. Competition, circulation and advertising. Newsp Res J. 2004;25(1):18–39.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Perse EM, Courtright JA. Normative images of communication media: mass and interpersonal channels in the new media environment. Human Commun Res. 1993;19(4):485–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Perse EM, Dunn DG. The utility of home computers and media use: implications of multimedia and connectivity. J Broadcasting Electronic Media. 1998;42(4):435–56.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Katz E. Mass communication research and the study of popular culture: an editorial note on a possible future for this journal. Stud Public Commun. 1959;2:1–6.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rubin AM. The uses-and_gratifications perspective of media effects. In: Bryant J, Zillmann D, editors. Media effects: advances in theory and research. 2nd ed. Mahawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2002. p. 525–48.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pattuelli MC, Rabina D. Forms, effects, function: LIS students’ attitudes towards portable e-book readers. Aslib Proc New Inf Perspect. 2010;62(3):228–244.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Moberg A, Johansson M, Finnveden G, Jonsson A. Printed and tablet e-paper newspaper from an environmental perspective—a screening life cycle assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2010;30:177–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Maynard S. The impact of e-books on young children’s reading habits. Publ Res Q. 2010;26:236–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fidler R. Mediamorphosis: understanding news media. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Pine Forge Press; 1997.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hannon C. As we may speak: metaphors, conceptual blends, and usability. Interactions. 2009;16(3):16–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barry A. Hollander
    • 1
    Email author
  • Dean M. Krugman
    • 1
  • Tom Reichert
    • 1
  • J. Adam Avant
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Journalism and Mass CommunicationUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations