Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Fear and Loathing in the Fog: The Perceived (and Persistent) Vagaries of Tenure Standards Among Mass Communication Professors

  • Published:
Publishing Research Quarterly Aims and scope

Abstract

Perhaps nothing strikes more fear into the hearts of all tenure-track professors than the process itself. Are four papers in this journal good enough? Are eight papers in another okay? What if someone doesn’t like me or my area of research? These issues have plagued academia since the first essay was penned by the first researcher hundreds of years ago. While personal bias and journal preference continue to infect honest tenure reviews, solutions exist. This does not mean we have a magic bullet to solve issues of bullying or elitism. However, if we are honest in our desire to improve the Academy, we should avail ourselves of every possible tool for improvement. This essay is based on a survey sent to 2,500 mass communication educators. Of the almost 500 respondents, roughly 10% took the time to express emotions that ranged from fear and confusion to outright rage and anger, all because what ought to be clear is not. The author offers 10 ideas of how academia can improve its evaluation of new faculty, as well as a few suggestions regarding the unnecessary inclusion of personal issues in a process that ought to be about creating better researchers and teachers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abandoning Print. Abandoning print, not peer review. Inside higher Ed. http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2008/02/28/open (2010). Accessed 5 Dec 2010.

  2. Aylesworth-Spink S. Getting jobs with a doctorate—career options for PhD graduates. Suite101.com. http://www.suite101.com/content/getting-jobs-with-a-doctorate—career-options-for-phd-graduates-a201804 (2010). Accessed 5 Dec 2010.

  3. Bradley SG. Managing the tenure process. The lab manager magazine, July 31, 2006. Accessed 10 Oct 2010.

  4. Clark DS. The medieval origins of modern legal education between church and state. Am J Comp Law. 1987;35(44):653–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Connolly JM. The academy’s freedom, the academy’s burden. NEA Hig Edu J. 2000;16(1):69–82.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dad D. Transparency and reciprocity. Confessions of a community college dean. http://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/confessions_of_a_community_college_dean/transparency_and_reciprocity (2010). Accessed 10 Oct 2010, March 27.

  7. De George RT. Ethics, academic freedom and academic tenure. J Acad Ethics. 2003;1:11–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fuchs RF. Academic freedom—Its basic philosophy, function, and history. Law Contemp Prob. 1963;28(3):431–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fuhrman S, Lazeson M. The public schools. In: Jamieson KH, editor. Institutions of American democracy. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goldin C, Katz LF. The shaping of higher education: the formative years in the United State, 1980–1940. J Econ Perspect. 1999;13(1):37–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Halse R, Lilien GL. The ombudsman: academic research in MS/OR: science or trivial pursuit. Interfaces. 1986;16(3):41–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hamilton NW. Academic ethics: problems and materials on professional conduct and shared governance. Westport, CT: Anerican Council on Education/Praeger; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hannam J. Medieval science, the church, and universities. Bede’s library. http://www.bede.org/university.htm (2010). Accessed 11 Oct 2010.

  14. He B, Patel M, Zhang Z, Chang KCC. Accessing the deep web: a survey. Commun ACM. 2007;50(5):95–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hofstadter R, Metzger WP. The development of academic freedom in the United States. New York: Columbia University Press; 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Justin T. Liberties, freedom and autonomy: a few reflections on academia’s estate. High Edu Policy. 2006;19:87–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Keast WR, John MW Jr, editors. Faculty tenure. London: American Association of University Professors, Association of American Colleges and Jossey-Bass, Inc; 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lawandowski D, Mayr P. Exploring the academic invisible web. Library Hi Tech. 2006;24(4):529–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Louis J, editor. Academic freedom and tenure. 2nd ed. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press; 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Madhaven J, Loredana A, Lyublena A, Alon H. Harnessing the Deep Web: present and future. Asilomar, CA; 2009.

  21. McPherson MS, Schapiro MO. Tenure issues in higher education. J Econ Perspect. 1999;13(1):85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Metzger WP. Academic tenure in America: a historical essay in faculty tenure—a report and recommendations for the commission on academic tenure in higher education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Office of the President. Strategic plan, phase II: 2009–2013. Oregon State University. http://oregonstate.edu/leadership/strategicplan/ (2010). Accessed 5 Dec 2010.

  24. Post R. Academic freedom: its history and evolution within the UC system. Berkeley, CA: Academic freedom Forum; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Perlmutter DD. Professionalize promotion and tenure. Chron High Edu. 2010; 18 Feb 2010.

  26. Resnik DB. What is ethics in research and why is it important? National institute of environmental health sciences: national institutes of health. http://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/whatis.cfm (2010). Accessed 1 Nov 2010.

  27. Sass SA. The pragmatic imagination. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvannia Press; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Seipel MMO. Assessing publication for tenure. J Soc Work Edu. 2003;39(1):79–88.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Stephen LC. Academic tenure and “white male” standards: some lessons from the patent law. Yale Law Rev. 1991;100:2065–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Stephen FJ, McKee M. Measuring academic potential: a case for academic tenure and process. Carleton Econ Papers. 2002;02(06):1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Stevenson A. Book of famous quotes. In: Haythum RK, editior. http://www.famous-quotes.com/author.php?aid=6974. Accessed 10 Oct 2010.

  32. Tenured R. Tenure, tenure: who’s got the tenure?” Tenured radical 2.0. http://tenured-radical.blogspot.com/2008/04/tenure-tenure-whos-got-tenure.html. Accessed 10 Oct 2010, April 2.

  33. Verrier DA. On becoming tenured: acquiring academic tenure at a research university. ASHE annual meeting paper. Minneapolis, MN: Association for the Study of Higher Education; 1992, 1 Nov 1992.

  34. William P. Future work. Change. 1995;27:22–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. William P. The twenty-first century professoriate. Academe. 2008;94(4):35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wilson R. The ivory sweatshop: academe is no longer a convivial refuge. Chron High Edu; 2010. 25 July 2010.

  37. Wright CA. The academic library as a gateway to the internet: an analysis of the extent and nature of search engine access from academic library home pages. College Res Lib. 2004;65(4):276–86.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kansas State University, 219B Kenzie Hall, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA

    Thomas Gould

Authors
  1. Thomas Gould
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Gould.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gould, T. Fear and Loathing in the Fog: The Perceived (and Persistent) Vagaries of Tenure Standards Among Mass Communication Professors. Pub Res Q 27, 36–53 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-010-9195-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-010-9195-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation