Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The potential for scholarly online books: Views from the Columbia University Online Books Evaluation Project

  • Published:
Publishing Research Quarterly Aims and scope

Abstract

The Columbia University Online Books Evaluation Project sought to understand both user reactions to online books in the scholarly world and the cost profiles of print and online books. Scholars appreciated the opportunity to use the online format to locate a book and to browse it. However, they sought a print copy for extended reading. Incremental costs of online books are small for publishers. Libraries’ life-cycle costs are lower for online books than for print books.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ann Peterson Bishop, Laura J. Neumann, Susan Leigh Star, Cecelia Merkel, Emily Ignacio, and Robert J. Sandusky. “Digital Libraries: Situating Use in Changing Information Infrastructure.” Preprint of Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51, no. 4 (March 2000).

  • Getz, Malcolm. “Information Storage.” Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science 52, supplement 15 (1993), 201–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantor, Paul. Objective Performance Measures for Academic and Research Libraries. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandel, Carol and Mary Summerfield. “Scholarly Monographs Online: Potentialities and Realities Suggested by the Columbia University Online Books Evaluation Project.” htt://wwww.arl.org/scomm/epub/papers/mandel.html. January 1998.

  • “Summary of SuperJournal Findings: Readers.” http://www.superjournal.ac.uk/sj/findread.htm. Draft April 26, 1999.

  • Summerfield, Mary. “Issues in the Economics of Scholarly Communication.” http://www.columbia.edu/cu/libraries/digital/texts/econpap.html. March 1998.

  • Summerfield, Mary and Paul Kantor. “Online Books Evaluation Project: Analytical Principles & Design.” http://www.columbia.edu/cu/libraries/digital/olbdocs/protocol/. May 1996.

  • Summerfield, Mary, Carol Mandel and Paul Kantor. “The Online Books Project, Columbia University: Final Report.” http://www.columbia.edu/cu/libraries/digital/olbdocs/finalreport.html. December 1999.

Download references

Authors
  1. Mary Summerfield
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Carol Mandel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paul Kantor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Summerfield and Mandel were both members of the Columbia University Libraries staff during the time of this project. Summerfield was a Project Director and Coordinator of this Project and Mandel was Deputy University Librarian and Director of this Project.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Summerfield, M., Mandel, C. & Kantor, P. The potential for scholarly online books: Views from the Columbia University Online Books Evaluation Project . Pub Res Q 16, 39–52 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-000-0015-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-000-0015-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation