Abstract
The history of sociology exhibits what might be called, after Gallie (1956), an “essentially contested “ canon. The key figures, sacred texts, and central ideas that constitute the sociological tradition are inherently in dispute. This essay examines the “contested canon “ within a historical framework to provide at least a partial explanation for the restricted interpretation of Georg Simmel as a structuralist sociologist. The sites of this contest are two New York City institutions, Columbia University and the New School for Social Research, both of which offered mid-century readings of Simmel’s works. At Columbia in the mid-1950s, Robert K. Merton advanced a structural reading of Simmel’s work. During the same broad period, the New School’s Albert Salomon championed a phenomenological reading of Simmel in his classes and seminars. Despite penetrating insights into Simmel’s links to the phenomenological tradition, Salomon’s interpretation has had less salience than the approach advanced by Merton. The differential success of these competing interpretations is explained in large measure by the institutionalization and dominance of Merton’s research tradition relative to Salomon’s.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abel, Theodore. 1936. Journal of Thoughts and Events, Volume 3 (March 5). Theodore Abel Collection, Rare Book and Manuscript Library, Columbia University.
Bierstedt, Robert. 1981. American Sociological Theory: A Critical History. New York: Academic Press.
Clark, T.N. 1995. “Paul F. Lazarsfeld and the Columbia Sociology Machine.” Unpublished manuscript.
Cole, S. and Cole, J.R. 1968. “Visibility and the Structural Bases of Awareness of Scientific Research.” American Sociological Review 33:397–413.
Contributions to Scholarship: Doctoral Dissertations of the Graduate Faculty of Political and Social Science. 1973. New School for Social Research.
Coser, Lewis A. 1954. Toward a Sociology of Social Conflict. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University.
—. 1956. The Functions of Social Conflict. New York: Free Press.
—. 1984. Refugee Scholars in America: Their Impact and Their Experiences. New Haven: Yale University Press.
-. 1987. Interview with the author, May 14.
-. 1989. Interview with the author, October 2.
Coser, Rose L. 1961. “Insulation from Observability and Types of Social Conformity.” American Sociological Review 26:28–39
Crothers, Charles. 1996. “The Postwar ’Columbia Tradition’ in Sociology.” Unpublished manuscript.
Gallic, W. B. 1956. “Essentially Contested Concepts.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56.
Hopkins, T. K. 1964. The Exercise of Influence in Small Groups. Totowa, NJ: Bedminster Press.
Jankélévitch, V. 1925. “Georg Simmel, philosophe de la vie.” Revue de métaphysique at de morale 32:213–57, 373-86.
Jaworski, Gary D. 1990. “Robert K. Merton as Postwar Prophet.” American Sociologist 21:209–216.
—. 1997. Georg Simmel and the American Prospect. New York: State University of New York Press.
Kracauer, S. 1995 [1920-21], “Georg Simmel.” In T.Y. Levin (ed.), The Mass Ornament: Weimar Essays.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Krohn, C.-D. 1993. Intellectuals in Exile: Refugee Scholars and the New School for Social Research. Translated by Rita and Robert Kimber. Amhersf. University of Massachusetts Press.
Lipset, Seymour M. and Smelser, Neil J. 1961. “The Setting of Sociology in the 1950s.” In Lipset and Smelser (Eds.), Sociology: the Progress of a Decade. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Maclver, Robert M. 1965. The Web of Government. Revised Edition. New York: Free Press.
Mathiessen, U. 1988. “Im Schatten einer endlosen grossen Zeit’: Etappen der intellektuellen Biographie Albert Salomons.” In Ilja Srubar (ed.), Exile, Wissenschaft, IdentitÄt: Die Emigration deutscher Sozial-wissenscbaftler, 1933-1945. Frankfurt-am-Main: Suhrkamp.
Merton, Robert K. 1957. Social Theory and Social Structure. Revised and Enlarged Edition. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
—. 1973 [1959]. “Social Conflict Over Styles of Sociological Work.” In The Sociology of Sciences: Theoretical and Emprirical Investigations. New York: Free Press.
-. 1988. Interview with the author, February 18.
—., Reader, G.G., and Kendell, P.L. (Eds). 1957. The Student Physician. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Mills, C. Wright. 1959. “Abstracted Empiricism.” In The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
Parsons, Talcott. 1963 [1955]. “Social Strains in America.” In Daniel Bell (ed.), The Radical Right. New York: Doubleday.
Rosenberg, R. 1984. An Interview with Lewis Coser. In W. Powell and R. Robbins (Eds.), Conflict and Consensus: A Festschrift in Honor of Lewis A. Coser. New York: Free Press.
Rutkoff, P.M. and Scott, W.B 1986. New School: A History of the New School for Social Research. New York: Free Press.
Salomon, Albert. 1940. Letter to H.E. Barnes, April 20. In the Albert Salomon Collection, Leo Baeck Institute (New York), Box 1, Korrespondenz, A-N.
Salomon, Albert.. 1943. “Simmel, Georg.” The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia. Volume 9. New York: Universal Jewish Encyclopedia.
—. 1945. “German Sociology.” In G. Gurvitch and W.E. Moore (eds.) Twentieth Century Sociology. New York: Philosophical Library.
-. 1962. Lecture Notes to “Simmel and Schutz as Sociologists.” Salomon Papers, Sozialwissenschaftliches Archiv, UniversitÄt Konstanz, Mappen Number 29.
—. 1995 [1963). “Georg Simmel Reconsidered.” International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 8:361–378.
-. 1966. Lecture Notes to Dilthey-Simmel Course, Sozialwissenschaftliches Archiv, UniversitÄt Konstanz, Mappen Number 26.
Schutz, Alfred. 1964. “The Homecomer.” In Collected Papers. Volume 2. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
—. 1970. “William James’s Concept of the Stream of Thought Phenomenologically Interpreted.” In Collected Papers. Volume 3. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
—, and Thomas Luckmann. 1973. The Structures of the Life-World. Translated by R.M. Zaner and H.T. Engelhardt, Jr., Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Schwerdtfeger, J. 1995. “Bergson und Simmel.” Simmel Newsletter 5: 89–96.
Shils, Edward. 1956. The Torment of Secrecy. New York: Free Press.
Simmel, Georg. 1950. The Sociology of Georg Simmel. Translated and edited by K.H. Wolff. New York: Free Press.
Spykman, Nichols J. 1925. The Social Theory of Georg Simmel. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tiryakian, Edward A. 1986. “Hegemonic Schools and the Development of Sociology: Rethinking the History of a Discipline” In R.C. Monk (ed.), Structures of Knowing. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Wagner, H. R. 1977. “The Bergsonian Period of Alfred Schutz.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 38:187–199.
—. 1983. Alfred Schutz: An Intellectual Biography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wallace, R. W. 1991. “The Struggle of a Department: Columbia Sociology in the 1920s.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 27: 323–340.
—. 1992. “Starting a Department and Getting it Under Way. Sociology at Columbia University, 1891-1914. “ Minerva 30:497–512
Wolff, Kurt H. 1993. Interview with the author, March 7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jaworski, G.D. Contested canon: Simmel scholarship at Columbia and the new school. Am Soc 29, 4–16 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-998-1024-9
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-998-1024-9