Skip to main content
Log in

James S. Coleman as a guide to social research

  • Review Essay
  • Published:
The American Sociologist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite his outstanding empirical work and his exceptional clarity as a theorist of collective choice, James S. Coleman's program for social science would take it in the wrong direction. Whatever else it does, social science must explain social processes. Coleman: 1) neglected to specify causal mechanisms, 2) promoted an incomplete and therefore misleading psychological reductionism, and 3) advocated a form of general theory—rational choice analysis—that cannot, in principle or in practice, provide adequate explanations for the great bulk of social processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Clark, J., (Eds.). (1996). James S. Coleman. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J.S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swedberg, R. (1990). Economics and Sociology. Redefining Their Boundaries: Conversations with Economists and Sociologists. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tilly, C. James S. Coleman as a guide to social research. Am Soc 28, 82–87 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-997-1009-0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-997-1009-0

Keywords

Navigation