Abstract
Despite his outstanding empirical work and his exceptional clarity as a theorist of collective choice, James S. Coleman's program for social science would take it in the wrong direction. Whatever else it does, social science must explain social processes. Coleman: 1) neglected to specify causal mechanisms, 2) promoted an incomplete and therefore misleading psychological reductionism, and 3) advocated a form of general theory—rational choice analysis—that cannot, in principle or in practice, provide adequate explanations for the great bulk of social processes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Clark, J., (Eds.). (1996). James S. Coleman. London: Falmer Press.
Coleman, J.S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Swedberg, R. (1990). Economics and Sociology. Redefining Their Boundaries: Conversations with Economists and Sociologists. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tilly, C. James S. Coleman as a guide to social research. Am Soc 28, 82–87 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-997-1009-0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-997-1009-0