Abstract
Where do public sociology and the study of natural resources meet? One promising intersection is at community-based natural resource management. At this juncture there are multiple opportunities for rural sociologists to embrace the tenets of public sociology, as espoused by Michael Burawoy. By working with an active, thick, and local ‘civil society’, rural sociologists have the opportunity to improve livelihoods as well as contribute to the sustainability of the natural resource base that so many depend upon. This article examines these possibilities by discussing three domains for rural sociologists to apply public sociology to community-based natural resource management: participation, empowerment, and knowledge coproduction. This article makes an explicit call for rural sociologists to ‘go public,’ and by doing so challenge the underlying structures of marginalization and inequity that have characterized public involvement in natural resource management through the contemporary era of resource management in the United States.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agrawal, A., & Gibson, C. C. (1999). Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development, 27(4), 629–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00161-2.
Armitage, D. (2005). Adaptive capacity and community-based natural resource management. Environmental Management, 35(6), 703–715.
Berkes, F. (2007). Community-based conservation in a globalized world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(39), 15188–15193.
Berkes, F. (2009). Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1692–1702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.001.
Bixler, R. P., Dell’Angelo, J., Mfune, O., & Roba, H. (2015). The political ecology of participatory conservation: Institutions and discourse. Journal of Political Ecology, 22(1), 164–182. https://doi.org/10.2458/v22i1.21083.
Bixler, R. P., Wald, D. M., Ogden, L. A., Leong, K. M., Johnston, E. W., & Romolini, M. (2016). Network governance for large-scale natural resource conservation and the challenge of capture. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14(3), 165–171. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1252.
Bodin, Ö. (2017). Collaborative environmental governance: Achieving collective action in social-ecological systems. Science, 357(6352), eaan1114. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan1114.
Bonney, R., Shirk, J. L., Phillips, T. B., Wiggins, A., Ballard, H. L., Miller-Rushing, A. J., & Parrish, J. K. (2014). Next steps for citizen science. Science, 343(6178), 1436–1437. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251554.
Brint, Steven. 2005. Guide for the Perplexed: On Michael Burawoy’s ‘Public Sociology.’ The American Sociologist, 20.
Burawoy, M. (2005a). 2004 American Sociological Association presidential address: For public sociology*. The British Journal of Sociology, 56(2), 259–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2005.00059.x.
Burawoy, M. (2005b). The critical turn to public sociology. Critical Sociology, 31(3), 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1163/1569163053946291.
Burawoy, M. (2005c). Third-wave sociology and the end of pure science. The American Sociologist, 36(3), 152–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-005-1022-0.
Buttel, F. H. (1996). Environmental and resource sociology: Theoretical issues and opportunities for Synthesis1. Rural Sociology, 61(1), 56–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.1996.tb00610.x.
Calhoun, C. (2005). The promise of public sociology. The British Journal of Sociology, 56(3), 355–363. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2005.00065.x.
Creese, G., McLaren, A. T., & Pulkingham, J. (2009). Rethinking Burawoy: Reflections from Canadian feminist sociology. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 34(3), 601–622.
Ericson, R. (2005). Publicizing sociology. The British Journal of Sociology, 56(3), 365–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2005.00066.x.
Freudenburg, W. R. (2006). Environmental degradation, disproportionality, and the double diversion: Reaching out, reaching ahead, and reaching beyond. Rural Sociology, 71(1), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1526/003601106777789792.
Fuller, S. (2000). Governance of science. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243.
Jeffries, V. (Ed.). (2009). Handbook of public sociology. Lanham Boulder New York Toronto Plymouth, UK: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Kellert, S., Mehta, J., Ebbin, S., & Lichtenfeld, L. (2000). Community natural resource management: Promise, rhetoric, and reality. Society & Natural Resources, 13(8), 705–715. https://doi.org/10.1080/089419200750035575.
Larson, A. M., & Soto, F. (2008). Decentralization of natural resource governance regimes. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 33(1), 213–239. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.environ.33.020607.095522.
Leap, B. T. (2018). Gone goose: The remaking of an American town in the age of climate change (1st ed.). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Loomis, C., & Loomis, Z. K. (1967). Rural sociology. In P. Lazarsfeld, W. Sewell, & H. Wilensky (Eds.), The uses of sociology (pp. 655–691). New York, NY: Basic Books.
Lynd, R. S. (1939). Knowledge for what: The place of social science in American culture. Reprint Edition: Princeton University Press.
Norström, Albert V., Christopher Cvitanovic, Marie F. Löf, Simon West, Carina Wyborn, Patricia Balvanera, Angela T. Bednarek, et al. 2020. Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research. Nature Sustainability, January, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0448-2
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons. Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions: Cambridge University Press.
Qin, H., Prasetyo, Y., Bass, M., Sanders, C., Prentice, E., & Nguyen, Q. (2020). Seeing the Forest for the trees: A Bibliometric analysis of environmental and resource sociology. Society & Natural Resources, 33(9), 1131–1148. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2019.1620900.
Selznick, P. (2010). TVA and the grass roots: A study of politics and organization. New Orleans: Quid Pro, LLC.
Sorokin, P., Zimmerman, C., & Galpin, C. (1930). A systematic source book in rural sociology. University of Minnesota Press https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/630910.
Ulrich-Schad, J. D., & Givens, J. E. (2020). The Forest in the future: A response to seeing the Forest for the trees. Society & Natural Resources, 33(9), 1154–1161. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2019.1709004.
Weber, E. P. (2000). A new vanguard for the environment: Grass-roots ecosystem management as a new environmental movement. Society & Natural Resources, 13(3), 237–259.
Western, D., & Wright, M. (1994). Natural connections: Perspectives in community based conservation. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
On behalf of the author, there is no conflict of interest.
The sole author states that there is no conflict of interest that influenced the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bixler, R.P. Fertile Soil for Organic Public Sociology: Community-Based Natural Resource Management. Am Soc 51, 558–565 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-020-09471-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-020-09471-z