Notes
The term “reflexivity” appears four times in Baehr’s book, none of which concerns Bourdieu.
References
Baehr, P. (2019). The unmasking style in social theory. London: Routledge.
Bourdieu, P. (2008). Sketch for a self–analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P. (2015). Méditations pascaliennes. Paris: Points.
Bourdieu, P. (2017). Anthropologie économique. Cours au Collège de France 1992–1993. Paris: Le Seuil.
Burawoy, M. (2018). Making sense of Bourdieu: from demolition to recuperation and critique. Catalyst, 2(1), 51–87.
Desrosières, A. (2010). La politique des grands nombres. Histoire de la raison statistique. Paris: La Découverte.
Gieryn, T. F. (1999). Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hossenfelder, S. (2018). Lost in math: How beauty leads physics astray. New York: Basic Books.
McLaughlin, N. (2010). Totalitarianism, social science, and the margins: Peter Baehr, Hannah Arendt, totalitarianism and the social sciences. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 35(3), 463–469.
Wacquant, L. (2001). Further notes on Bourdieu’s Marxism. International Journal of Contemporary Sociology, 38(1), 103–109.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Larregue, J. A Scholastic Critique of Sociological Theory: on Peter Baehr’s The Unmasking Style in Social Theory. Am Soc 51, 5–9 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-020-09431-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-020-09431-7