How Not to Establish a Subfield: Media Sociology in the United States

Article

Abstract

US-American sociology has largely failed to examine the transformation of mediated communication of the past 20 years. If sociology is to be conceived as a general social science concerned with analyzing and critically scrutinizing past, present, and future conditions of collective human existence, this failure, and the ignorance it engenders, is detrimental. This ignorance, we argue, may be traced back to the weak self-identity, institutionalization and position of media sociology in the discipline. Our argument here is threefold: 1) There was an opportunity structure for specialization, that is, a venerable research tradition in media sociology since the first half of the twentieth century. This tradition links back to classics in sociology and peaked at a time (1970s and 1980s) when the discipline differentiated institutionally and many new sections emerged in the American Sociological Association. 2) Despite this tradition, media sociology has not become established in sociology in the United States until recently. 3) Lastly, we locate reasons for non-establishment on three distinct but interconnected levels: the history of ideas in media sociology, institutional/disciplinary history, and disciplinary politics.

Keywords

Sociology of media Sociology of news Sociology of mass communication History of sociology Specialization 

References

  1. Abbott, A. D. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Abbott, A. D. (2001). Chaos of disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Adorno, T. W. (1941). On popular music (with the assistance of George Simpson). Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung, 9(1), 17–48.Google Scholar
  4. Alexander, J. C., Jacobs, R. N., & Smith, P. (2012). The Oxford handbook of cultural sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Altheide, D. L. (1976). Creating reality: How TV news distorts events. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Altheide, D. L., & Snow, R. P. (1979). Media logic. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. American Sociological Association. (1985). Guide to graduate departments of sociology. Washington, D.C: American Sociological Association.Google Scholar
  8. Anderson, C. W. (2013). Rebuilding the news: metropolitan journalism in the digital age. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Andrews, K. T., & Caren, N. (2010). Making the news: movement organizations, media attention, and the public agenda. American Sociological Review, 75(6), 841–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bail, C. A. (2012). The fringe effect: civil society organizations and the evolution of media discourse about Islam since the September 11th attacks. American Sociological Review, 77(6), 855–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Baker, C. E. (2002). Media, markets, and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bauman, Z. (1995). Thinking sociologically. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. Belair-Gagnon, V. (2015). Social media at BBC News: The re-making of crisis reporting. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Benson, R. (2004). Bringing the sociology of media back in. Political Communication, 21(2), 275–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Benson, R. (2009). Shaping the public sphere: Habermas and beyond. The American Sociologist, 40(3), 175–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Benson, R. (2014). Strategy follows structure: A media sociology manifesto. In S. Waisbord (Ed.), Media sociology: A reappraisal (pp. 24–45). Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  17. Benson, R., & Neveu, E. (2005). Bourdieu and the journalistic field. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  18. Benson, R., & Saguy, A. C. (2005). Constructing social problems in an age of globalization: a French-American comparison. American Sociological Review, 70(2), 233–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Boczkowski, P. J. (2004). Digitizing the news: innovation in online newspapers. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Brienza, C. (2015). Activism, legitimation, or record: towards a new tripartite typology of academic journals. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 46(2), 141–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Brienza, C., & Revers, M. (2016). The field of American media sociology: origins, resurrection, and consolidation. Sociology Compass, 10(7), 539–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Burawoy, M. (2005). 2004 presidential address. For public sociology. American Sociological Review, 70(1), 4–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Calhoun, C. J. (1992). Habermas and the public sphere. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Calhoun, C. (1998). Community without propinquity revisited: communications technology and the transformation of the urban public sphere. Sociological Inquiry, 68(3), 373–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chan, T. W., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (2007). Social status and newspaper readership. American Journal of Sociology, 112(4), 1095–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Clayman, S. E., Heritage, J., Elliott, M. N., & McDonald, L. L. (2007). When does the watchdog bark? Conditions of aggressive questioning in presidential news conferences. American Sociological Review, 72(1), 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Couldry, N. (2008). Mediatization or mediation? Alternative understandings of the emergent space of digital storytelling. New Media & Society, 10(3), 373–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Crane, D. (1992). The production of culture: Media and the urban arts. Newbury Park: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Croteau, D., & Hoynes, W. (2003). Media society: Industries, images, and audiences (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
  30. Domingo, D., Paterson, C. A. (2011). Making Online News Volume 2: Newsroom Ethnographies in the Second Decade of Internet Journalism. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  31. Earl, J. (2015). CITASA: intellectual past and future. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 478–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fishman, M. (1980). Manufacturing the news. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  33. Fleck, C. (2011). A transatlantic history of the social sciences: Robber barons, the Third Reich and the invention of empirical social research. London: Bloomsbury Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: a constructionist approach. The American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gans, H. J. (1979). Deciding what’s news: A study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Gitlin, T. (1978). Media sociology: the dominant paradigm. Theory and Society, 6(2), 205–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making & unmaking of the New Left. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  38. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Habermas, J. (1962). Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit: Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. Neuwied: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
  40. Hall, S. (1973). Encoding and Decoding in the Television Discourse: Paper for the Council of Europe Colloquy on’Training in the Critical Reading of Televisual Language’, Organized by the Council and the Centre for Mass Communication Research, University of Leicester, September 1973. Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
  41. Hall, S. (1977). Culture, the media and the ideological effect. In J. Curran, M. Gurevitch, & J. Woollacott (Eds.), Mass communication and society (pp. 315–348). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  42. Hall, J. R., Grindstaff, L., & Lo, M. C. (2010). Handbook of cultural sociology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Healy, K. (2017). Fuck nuance. Sociological Theory, 35(2), 118–127.Google Scholar
  44. Hepp, A. (2013). Cultures of mediatization. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  45. Hepp, A., & Krotz, F. (2014). Mediatized worlds: Culture and society in a media age. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (1947). Dialektik der Aufklärung: Philosophische Fragmente. Amsterdam: Querido.Google Scholar
  47. Iyengar, S., & Simon, A. (1993). News coverage of the gulf crisis and public opinion: a study of agenda-setting, priming, and framing. Communication Research, 20(3), 365–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jackson, J. D., Nielsen, G. M., & Hsu, Y. (2011). Mediated society: A critical sociology of media. Don Mills: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Jacobs, R. N. (2009). Culture, the public sphere, and media sociology: a search for a classical founder in the work of Robert Park. The American Sociologist, 40(3), 149–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Jacobs, M. D., & Hanrahan, N. W. (2005). The Blackwell companion to the sociology of culture. Malden: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Jacobs, R. N., & Townsley, E. (2011). The space of opinion: Media intellectuals and the public sphere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Janssen, S., Kuipers, G., & Verboord, M. (2008). Cultural globalization and arts journalism: the international orientation of arts and culture coverage in Dutch, French, German, and U.S. Newspapers, 1955 to 2005. American Sociological Review, 73(5), 719–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Katz, E. (2009). Why sociology abandoned communication. The American Sociologist, 40(3), 167–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communications. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  56. Klinenberg, E. (2005) Convergence: News Production in a Digital Age. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 597(1), 48–64.Google Scholar
  57. Lang, K., & Lang, G. E. (1953). The unique perspective of television and its effect: a pilot study. American Sociological Review, 18(1), 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lang, G. E., & Lang, K. (1983). The battle for public opinion: The president, the press, and the polls during Watergate. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Lang, K., & Lang, G. E. (2006). Personal influence and the new paradigm: some inadvertent consequences. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 608(1), 157–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Berelson, B. (1944). The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York: Duell, Sloan, and Pearce.Google Scholar
  61. Lester, M. (1980). Generating newsworthiness: the interpretive construction of public events. American Sociological Review, 45(6), 984–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Livingstone, S. (2009). On the mediation of everything: ICA presidential address 2008. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
  63. Lundby, K. (2009). Mediatization: concept, changes, consequences. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  64. McChesney, R. W. (1999). Rich media, poor democracy: Communication politics in dubious times. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  65. McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. McNair, B. (1998). The sociology of journalism. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  67. Merton, R. K., Lowenthal, M. F., & Curtis, A. (1946). Mass persuasion: The social psychology of a war bond drive. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  68. Meyen, M., & Löblich, M. (2006). Klassiker der Kommunikationswissenschaft: Fach- und Theoriegeschichte in Deutschland. Konstanz: UVK.Google Scholar
  69. Meyrowitz, J. (1985). No sense of place: The impact of electronic media on social behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Molotch, H., & Lester, M. (1974). News as purposive behavior: on the strategic use of routine events, accidents, and scandals. American Sociological Review, 39(1), 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Molotch, H., & Lester, M. (1975). Accidental news: the great oil spill as local occurrence and national event. The American Journal of Sociology, 81(2), 235–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Myers, D. J., & Caniglia, B. S. (2004). All the rioting that’s fit to print: selection effects in national newspaper coverage of civil disorders, 1968-1969. American Sociological Review, 69(4), 519–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Neff, G. (2014). Boundaries and centers: Disciplines and the mediation of communication studies. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  74. Oliver, P. E., & Maney, G. M. (2000). Political processes and local newspaper coverage of protest events: from selection bias to triadic interactions. American Journal of Sociology, 106(2), 463–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Park, R. E. (1922). The Immigrant press and its control. New York: Harper & Bros.Google Scholar
  76. Park, R. E. (1923). The natural history of the newspaper. The American Journal of Sociology, 29(3), 273–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Paterson, C. A., & Domingo, D. (2008). Making Online News Volume 1: The Ethnography of New Media Production. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  78. Peterson, R. A. (Ed.). (1976). The production of culture. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  79. Peterson, R. A., & Anand, N. (2004). The production of culture perspective. Annual Review of Sociology, 30(1), 311–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Pooley, J., & Katz, E. (2008). Further Notes on Why American Sociology Abandoned Mass Communication Research . Journal of Communication, 58(4), 767–786.Google Scholar
  81. Revers, M. (2017). Contemporary journalism in the us and germany: Agents of accountability. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Ritzer, G., & Jurgenson, N. (2010). Production, consumption, prosumption: the nature of capitalism in the age of the digital “prosumer.”. Journal of Consumer Culture, 10(1), 13–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Roscigno, V. J., & Danaher, W. F. (2001). Media and mobilization: the case of radio and southern textile worker insurgency, 1929 to 1934. American Sociological Review, 66(1), 21–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: the evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9–20.Google Scholar
  85. Schlesinger, P. (1978). Putting “reality” together: BBC News. London: Constable.Google Scholar
  86. Schudson, M. (1978). Discovering the news: A social history of American newspapers. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  87. Schudson, M. (2011). The sociology of news. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  88. Shils, E. (1970). Tradition, ecology, and institution in the history of sociology. Daedalus, 99(4), 760–825.Google Scholar
  89. Snow, D. A., Soule, S. A., & Kriesi, H. (2004). The Blackwell companion to social movements. Malden: Blackwell Pub.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Starr, P. (2004). The creation of the media: Political origins of modern communications. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  91. Sweeney, E. (2015). Shifting paradigms on the verge of a revolution: The evolution of the ASA section on Science, Knowledge, and Technology. SKATOLOGY: Newsletter of the ASA Section on Science, Knowledge, & Technology, April 2015, 4–9.Google Scholar
  92. Thompson, J. B. (1995). The media and modernity: A social theory of the media. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  93. Tuchman, G. (1972). Objectivity as strategic ritual: an examination of newsmen’s notions of objectivity. American Journal of Sociology, 77(4), 660–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Tuchman, G. (1973). Making news by doing work: routinizing the unexpected. American Journal of Sociology, 79(1), 110–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Tuchman, G. (1978). Making news: A study in the construction of reality. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  96. Tumber, H. (2014). Back to the future? The sociology of news and journalism from black and white to the digital age. In S. Waisbord (Ed.), Media sociology: A reappraisal (pp. 63–78). Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  97. Tunstall, J. (1970). Media sociology: A reader. London: Constable.Google Scholar
  98. Tyler, I. (2007). From ‘The Me Decade’ to ‘The Me Millennium’: the cultural history of narcissism. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 10(3), 343–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Usher, N. (2014). Making news at the New York Times. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  100. van de Rijt, A., Shor, E., Ward, C., & Skiena, S. (2013). Only 15 minutes? The social stratification of fame in printed media. American Sociological Review, 78(2), 266–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Waisbord, S. (Ed.). (2014a). Media sociology: A reappraisal. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  102. Waisbord, S. (2014b). Introduction: Reappraising media sociology. In S. Waisbord (Ed.), Media sociology: A reappraisal (pp. 1–21). Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  103. Weber, M. (1988). Rede auf dem ersten Deutschen Soziologentage in Frankfurt 1910. In M. Weber (Ed.), Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Soziologie und Sozialpolitk (pp. 431–449). Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
  104. Williams, R. (1958). Culture and society, 1780–1950. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  105. Wirth, L. (1948). Consensus and mass communication. American Sociological Review, 13(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Wright, C. R. (1956). Sociology of mass communication, 1945-55. In H. L. Zetterberg (Ed.), Sociology in the United States of America: A trend report, documentation in the social sciences (pp. 78–83). Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  107. Ziemann, A. (2006). Soziologie der Medien. Bielefeld: transcript.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of FrankfurtFrankfurtGermany
  2. 2.City, University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations