Data from the General Social Survey suggest that conservatives have become less trustful of scientists since the 1970s. Gauchat argues that this is because conservatives increasingly see scientific findings as threatening to their worldview. However, the General Social Survey data concern trust in scientists, not in science. We suggest that conservatives’ diminishing trust in scientists reflects the fact that scientists in certain fields, particularly social science, have increasingly adopted a liberal-activist stance, seeking to influence public policy in a liberal direction.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Murray himself strongly supports a causal link. In a 1-star review on Amazon.com, he calls Freedman’s book “a biased attack on the science of psychology, the profession of communications, and the common sense of any educated reader.” In response to a request for sources that refute Freedman (2002), Murray sent us an unpublished paper that did not cite any of Freedman’s work. In response to a follow-up request, he referred us to a special issue of the Hofstra Law Review (Summer 1994), which was published before the book in question.
Some journals use two rather than three referees, or will accept a paper if two-out-of-three write a favorable report. Sometimes more than one editor is involved in assessing submissions. If we assume that only one editor and two referees handle a submission, it does not substantially change the estimated probability of facing a discriminator.
Abascal, M., & Baldassarri, D. (2015). Love thy neighbor? Ethnoracial diversity and trust reexamined. American Journal of Sociology, 121(3), 722–782.
Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
American Academy of Pediatrics. (2000). Testimony of the American Academy of Pediatrics on media violence before the U.S. Senate Commerce Committee. Retrieved from http://ibrarian.net/navon/paper/TESTIMONY_Of_the_AMERICAN_ACADEMY_OF_PEDIATRICS_O.pdf?paperid=4330072. Accessed 1 March 2017.
American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, American Psychological Association, American Medical Association, American Academy of Family Physicians, & American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Joint statement on the impact of entertainment violence on children. Congressional Public Health Summit. Retrieved from http://public.psych.iastate.edu/caa/VGVpolicyDocs/00AAP%20-%20Joint%20Statement.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2017.
American Educational Research Association et al. (2013). Brief of the American Educational Research Association et al. as amici curiae in support of respondents. No. 11-345. Abigail Noel Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin et al. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ebb8/97d10d24e6435b44163f57870b4c7a26c5dc.pdf?_ga=2.23810877.641589602.1497940175-70837359.1497940175. Accessed 1 March 2017.
Benbow, C. P., Lubinski, D., Shea, D. L., & Eftekhari-Sanjani, H. (2000). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability at age 13: Their status 20 years later. Psychological Science, 11(6), 474–480.
Bhattacharjee, Y. (2013, April 28). The mind of a con man. The New York Times Magazine, p. MM44.
Brandt, M. J., Reyna, C., Chambers, J. R., Crawford, J. T., & Wetherell, G. (2014). The ideological-conflict hypothesis: Intolerance among both liberals and conservatives. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(1), 27–34.
Carl, N., Cofnas, N., & Woodley of Menie, M. A. (2016). Scientific literacy, optimism about science and conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 299–302.
Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (2009). Should scientists study race and IQ? YES: The scientific truth must be pursued. Nature, 457(7231), 788–789.
Chambers, J. R., Swan, L. K., & Heesacker, M. (2015). Perceptions of U.S. social mobility are divided (and distorted) along ideological lines. Psychological Science, 26(4), 413–423.
Cofnas, N. (2016). Science is not always “self-correcting”: Fact–value conflation and the study of intelligence. Foundations of Science, 21(3), 477–492.
Crawford, J. T. (2012). The ideologically objectionable premise model: Predicting biased political judgments on the left and right. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 138–151.
Crawford, J. T., Jussim, L., Cain, T. R., & Cohen, F. (2013). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation differentially predict biased evaluations of media reports. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(1), 163–174.
Crawford, J. T., Kay, S. A., & Duke, K. E. (2015). Speaking out of both sides of their mouths: Biased political judgments within (and between) individuals. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(4), 422–430.
Duarte, J. L., Crawford, J. T., Stern, C., Haidt, J., Jussim, L., & Tetlock, P. E. (2015). Political diversity will improve social psychological science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 38, 1–13.
Flynn, J. R. (2007). Rational discussion of the offensive is okay. Cato unbound. Retrieved from http://www.cato-unbound.org/2007/11/21/james-r-flynn/rational-discussion-offensive-okay. Accessed 1 March 2017.
Freedman, J. L. (2002). Media violence and its effect on aggression: Assessing the scientific evidence. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Ganley, C. M., Mingle, L. A., Ryan, A. M., Ryan, K., Vasilyeva, M., & Perry, M. (2013). An examination of stereotype threat effect on girls’ mathematics performance. Developmental Psychology, 49(10), 1886–1897.
Gardner, H. (2001). The ethical responsibilities of professionals. The good project: Ideas and tools for a good life. Retrieved from http://thegoodproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/GoodWork2.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2017.
Gauchat, G. (2012). Politicization of science in the public sphere: A study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. American Sociological Review, 77(2), 167–187.
Gottfredson, L. S. (2005). What if the hereditarian hypothesis is true? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11(2), 311–319.
Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., & Haidt, J. (2012). The moral stereotypes of liberals and conservatives: exaggeration of differences across the political spectrum. PloS ONE, 7(12), e50092.
Halpern, D. F. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (3rd ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Halpern, D. F. (2012). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (4th ed.). New York: Psychology Press.
Honeycutt, N., & Freberg, L. (2017). The liberal and conservative experience across academic disciplines: An extension of Inbar and Lammers. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(2), 115–123.
Inbar, Y., & Lammers, J. (2012). Political diversity in social and personality psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(5), 496–503.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375.
Jussim, L. (2015). Is stereotype threat overcooked, overstated, and oversold? Heterodox Academy. Retrieved from http://heterodoxacademy.org/2015/12/30/is-stereotype-threat-overcooked-overstated-and-oversold/. Accessed 1 March 2017.
Kahan, D. M. (2013). Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection. Judgment and Decision making, 8(4), 407–424.
Kruglanski, A. W. (2004). The psychology of closed mindedness. New York: Psychology Press.
LaCour, M. J., & Green, D. P. (2014). When contact changes minds: An experiment on transmission of support for gay equality. Science, 346(6215), 1366–1369.
Liu, B. S., & Ditto, P. H. (2012). What dilemma? Moral evaluation shapes factual belief. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(3), 316–323.
Lloyd, J. (2006). Study paints bleak picture of ethnic diversity. Financial Times. Retrieved from http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/c4ac4a74-570f-11db-9110-0000779e2340.html#axzz3V0WTKbXG. Accessed 1 March 2017.
Marra, W. C., & Polsky, S. E. (2005). Lack of confidence: Faculty of Arts and Sciences votes, 218–185-18, to express lack of confidence in Summers. The Harvard Crimson. Retrieved from http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2005/3/16/lack-of-confidence-in-a-sharp/. Accessed 1 March 2017.
Martin, C. C. (2016). How ideology has hindered sociological insight. The American Sociologist, 47(1), 115–130.
McCright, A. M., Dentzman, K., Charters, M., & Dietz, T. (2013). The influence of political ideology on trust in science. Environmental Research Letters, 8(4), 1–9.
Mooney, C. (2005). The Republican war on science. New York: Basic Books.
Nam, H. H., Jost, J. T., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2013). “Not for all the tea in China!” Political ideology and the avoidance of dissonance-arousing situations. PlOS ONE, 8(4), e59837.
Nisbet, E. C., Cooper, K. E., & Garrett, R. K. (2015). The partisan brain: How dissonant science messages lead conservatives and liberals to (dis)trust science. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 658(1), 36–66.
Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716.
Putnam, R. D. (2007). E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174.
Putnam, R. D. (2013). Brief of Dr. Robert D. Putnam as amicus curiae in support of respondents. No. 11-345. Abigail Noel Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin et al. http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/11-345-respondent-amicus-Putman.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2017.
Redding, R. E. (2001). Sociopolitical diversity in psychology: The case for pluralism. American Psychologist, 56(3), 205–215.
Redding, R. E. (2012). Likes attract: The sociopolitical groupthink of (social) psychologists. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(5), 512–515.
Sesardic, N. (2005). Making sense of heritability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, C. (2014). The sacred project of American sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sowell, T. (1987). A conflict of visions: Ideological origins of political struggles. New York: William Morrow.
Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797–811.
Sternberg, R. J. (2005). There are no public-policy implications: A reply to Rushton and Jensen (2005). Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11(2), 295–301.
Thernstrom, A., Thernstrom, S., Nagai, A. K., & Nieli, R. (2013). Brief of Abigail Thernstrom, Stephan Thernstrom, Althea K. Nagai, and Russell Nieli as amici curiae in support of petitioners. No. 11-345. Abigail Noel Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin et al. Retrieved from http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/supreme_court_preview/briefs/11-345_petitioneramcu4scholars.authcheckdam.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2017.
Wai, J., Cacchio, M., Putallaz, M., & Makel, M. C. (2010). Sex differences in the right tail of cognitive abilities: A 30 year examination. Intelligence, 38(4), 412–423.
Weber, M. (2009). Science as a vocation. In H. H. Gerth & C. W. Mills (Eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in sociology (pp. 129–156). New York: Routledge.
Wright, J. P., & DeLisi, M. (2016). Conservative criminology: A call to restore balance to the social sciences. New York: Routledge.
Yong, E. (2013). Psychologists strike a blow for reproducibility. Nature. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/news/psychologists-strike-a-blow-for-reproducibility-1.14232#/b3. Accessed 1 March 2017.
Thanks to Lawrence Nichols and Neven Sesardić for helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper.
About this article
Cite this article
Cofnas, N., Carl, N. & Woodley of Menie, M.A. Does Activism in Social Science Explain Conservatives’ Distrust of Scientists?. Am Soc 49, 135–148 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-017-9362-0
- Public understanding of science
- Politics and science
- Trust in science
- Political polarization