The American Sociologist

, Volume 48, Issue 3–4, pp 382–401 | Cite as

Networking in France. Is there a French School of Social Network Analysis?

Article

Abstract

Social Network Analysis (SNA) is a sociology based on interaction that visualizes and models relations between actors. Whereas interaction is approached by classical scholars, we had to wait until the 1970s and the birth of computer science to see social networks analysis develop. This article investigates the influence of SNA in France from the 1980s and wonder if there is a French school of SNA? To do so, we first resume social networks history and highlight its contribution to sociology. Second, we analyze the trajectory and profile of five “disciplinary entrepreneurs,” whose role in the field is important as they master three necessary languages for SNA: English, Mathematics and Computer Science. Third, in order to put back those individuals in their social structures, we cross SNA with the different French sociological tradition(s) (according to topics and methods). Last, we wonder if the institutionalization process succeeded in the creation of institutions from which a French SNA would be able to expand?

Keywords

Social network analysis Disciplinary entrepreneurs Institutionalization Sociology of science 

References

  1. Ansart, P. (1990). Les sociologies contemporaines. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
  2. Barnes, J. A. (1954). Class and committees in a Norwegian island parish. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, H. S. (1995). Moral entrepreneurs: the creation and enforcement of deviant categories (pp. 169–178). Deviance: A symbolic interactionist approach.Google Scholar
  4. Bidart, C., Degenne, A., & Grossetti, M. (2011). La vie en réseau. Dynamique des relations sociales, Paris, Presses universitaires de France, coll. « Le lien social ».Google Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le capital social. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, 31, 2–3.Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1997). Le champ économique. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, 119, 48–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brailly, J., Eloire, F., Favre, G., & Pina-Stranger, A., (forthcoming). Explorer les réseaux à l’échelle de la triade: L’apport des modèles statistiques ERGM. L’Année Sociologique.Google Scholar
  8. Burt, R. S. (2009). Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Convert, B., & Heilbron, J. (2004). Genèse de la « nouvelle sociologie économique » aux Etats-Unis. In J. Heilbron, R. Lenoir, & G. Sapiro (Eds.), Pour une histoire des sciences sociales, hommage à Pierre Bourdieu. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
  10. Courgeau, D. (1972). Les réseaux de relations entre personnes. Etude d'un Milieu Rural. Population (French Edition), 27(4), 641–683.Google Scholar
  11. Courgeau, D. (1975). Les réseaux de relations entre personnes. Etude d'un Milieu Urbain. Population (French Edition), 30(2), 271–283.Google Scholar
  12. Crozier, M., & Friedberg, E. (1977). L'acteur et filesysteme. Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar
  13. Degenne, A. (1983). Sur les réseaux de sociabilité. Revue Française de Sociologie, 24(1), 109–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Degenne, A., & Flament, C. (1984). La notion de “regularite” dans l’analyse des reseaux sociaux. Bulletin de méthodologie Sociologique, 2(1), 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Degenne, A., & Forsé, M. (2004). Les réseaux sociaux. Une analyse structurale en sociologie (Vol. 1994). Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
  16. Déjean, F., Gond, J. P., & Leca, B. (2004). Measuring the unmeasured: an institutional entrepreneur strategy in an emerging industry. Human Relations, 57(6), 741–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Éloire, F. (2015). Qui se ressemble s’assemble? Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, 5, 104–119.Google Scholar
  18. Eloire, F., Penalva-Icher, E., & Lazega, E. (2011). Application de l'analyse des réseaux complets à l'échelle interorganisationnelle. Terrains & Travaux, 2, 77–98.Google Scholar
  19. Ferrand, A. (1997). La structure des systèmes de relations. L'Année Sociologique, 47, 37–54.Google Scholar
  20. Ferrand, A. (2011). Appartenances multiples opinion plurielle. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses Univ. Septentrion.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ferrand, A., & Federico, A. D. (2014). L’analyse des réseaux sociaux en France: émergence (1977-1991) et diffusion des compétences (2005-2013). Socio-logos, Online since the 11th january 2014. http://socio-logos.revues.org/279. Accessed 7 June 2016.
  22. Ferrand, A., & Mounier, L. (1990). Relations sexuelles et relations de confidence: analyse de réseaux. Paris: Editions du CNRS.Google Scholar
  23. Ferrand, A., & Mounier, L. (1993). L'échange de paroles sur la sexualité: une analyse des relations de confidence. Population (French Edition), 48(5), 1451–1475.Google Scholar
  24. Flament, C. (1963). Applications of graph theory to group structure. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  25. Forsé, M. (1981). Les réseaux de sociabilité dans un village. Population, 36-6, 1141–1162.Google Scholar
  26. Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Freeman, L. C. (2004). The development of social network analysis. A study in the sociology of science. Vancouver: Empirical Press.Google Scholar
  28. Friedmann, G. (1955). Le Travail en miettes. Esprit (1940-), 232 (10/11), 1725–1747.Google Scholar
  29. Gingras, Y. (1991). L’institutionnalisation de la recherche en milieu universitaire et ses effets. Sociologie et Sociétés, 23(1), 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gingras, Y. (2002). Les formes spécifiques de l'internationalité du champ scientifique. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, 1, 31–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Grossetti, M. (1990). Enseignement supérieur et technopoles: le cas de l'informatique à Toulouse. Revue Française de Sociologie, 31, 463–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Grossetti, M., & Barthe, J. F. (2008). Dynamique des réseaux interpersonnels et des organisations dans les créations d'entreprises. Revue Française de Sociologie, 49(3), 585–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Grossetti, M., Barthe, J. F., & Chauvac, N. (2011). Studying relational chains from narrative material. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de méthodologie Sociologique, 110(1), 11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Grossetti, M., & Godart, F. (2007). Harrison White: des réseaux sociaux à une théorie structurale de l'action. Introduction au texte de Harrison White Réseaux et histoires. SociologieS.Google Scholar
  36. Héran, F. (1988). La sociabilité, une pratique culturelle. Economie et Statistique, 216(1), 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Laumann, E. O. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. Lazega, E. (1999). Le phénomène collégial: une théorie structurale de l'action collective entre pairs. Revue Française de Sociologie, 40(4), 639–670.Google Scholar
  39. Lazega, E., & Mounier, L. (2002). Interdependent entrepreneurs and the social discipline of their cooperation: The research program of structural economic sociology for a society of organizations. In L. Favereau (Ed.), Conventions and structures in economic organization: markets, networks, and hierarchies (pp. 147–199). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  40. Levine, D. N., Carter, E. B., & Gorman, E. M. (1976a). Simmel's influence on American sociology. I. American Journal of Sociology, 81(4), 813–845.Google Scholar
  41. Levine, D. N., Carter, E. B., & Gorman, E. M. (1976b). Simmel’s influence on American sociology. II. American Journal of Sociology, 81, 1112–1132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. B. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 657–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Marineau, R. F. (1989). Jacob Levi Moreno, 1889-1974. Father of psychodrama, sociometry and group-psychotherapy (pp. 23–28). Tavistock/Routledge, London and New York: International Library of Group Psychotherapy and Group Process. Google Scholar
  44. Milgram, S. (1967). The small world problem. Psychology Toda, 1(May), 60–67.Google Scholar
  45. Mizruchi, M. S. (1996). What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annual Review of Sociology, 22(1), 271–298.Google Scholar
  46. Moreno, J. L., & Jennings, H. H. (1934). Who shall survive? (vol 58). Washington, DC: Nervous and mental disease publishing company.Google Scholar
  47. Mullins, N. C. (1972). The development of a scientific specialty: the phage group and the origins of molecular biology. Minerva, 10(1), 51–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mullins, N.C. (1973a). Theories and theory groups in contemporary American sociology.Google Scholar
  49. Mullins, N. C. (1973b). The development of specialties in social science: the case of ethnomethodology. Science Studies, 3(3), 245–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Orman, G. K., Labatut, V., & Cherifi, H. (2012). Comparative evaluation of community detection algorithms: a topological approach. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2012(08), P08001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Simmel, G. (1908). Sociologie. Essai sur les formes de la socialisation. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  52. Stouffer, S. A., Suchman, E. A., DeVinney, L. C., Star, S. A., & Williams Jr, R. M. (1949). The American soldier: adjustment during army life. (studies in social psychology in world war II), Vol. 1, MA/AH Publishing Series.Google Scholar
  53. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: methods and applications, 8. New York: Cambridge university press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Weber, M. (1905). 2002. The protestant ethic and the “Spirit” of capitalism and other writings, 129–156.Google Scholar
  55. Wellman, B., & Berkowitz, S. D. (1988). Social structures: A network approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  56. White, H. C., Boorman, S. A., & Breiger, R. L. (1976). Social structure from multiple networks. I. Blockmodels of Roles and Positions. The American Journal of Sociology, 81(4), 730–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wolfe, A. W. (1979). The rise of network thinking in anthropology. Social Networks, 1(1), 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Université Paris-Dauphine, PSL Research University, CNRS, UMR [7170], IRISSOParis Cedex 16France
  2. 2.Université Lille 1, Clersé (UMR CNRS 8019)Villeneuve d’Ascq CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations