Advertisement

The American Sociologist

, Volume 48, Issue 2, pp 172–191 | Cite as

Canadian Sociology for Sale? Academic Branding in the ‘Neo-Liberal Age’

  • Roger Pizarro MilianEmail author
  • Neil McLaughlin
Article

Abstract

Narratives about the influence of neo-liberal forces on post-secondary education are legion within the contemporary literature. Some have recently argued that the promotional tactics used by Canadian sociology departments reflect the broader corporatization of the system, highlighting the vocationalization of the discipline at the hands of market forces. We conduct a mixed-methods analysis of the marketing practises used by English-speaking sociology departments in Canada and find only limited support for this argument. Instead, observed promotional tactics appear to be quite diverse, aimed at multiple stakeholders, and reflecting the complex institutional environment in which sociology departments operate.

Keywords

Canada Departments Marketing 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the creators of Rapidminer Studio for making this powerful tool available free of charge to academics. Without their generosity this paper would look very different.

References

  1. Argenti, P. (2000). Branding B-schools: Reputation management for MBA programs. Corporate Reputation Review, 3(2), 171–178. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baruch, Y. (2006). On logos, business cards: the case of UK universities. In A. Rafaeli & M. Pratt (Eds.), Artifacts and Organizations: Beyond Mere Symbolism (pp. 181–198). London, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  3. Belanger, C., Suchita, B., & Longden, B. (2014). How Canadian universities use social media to brand themselves. Tertiary Education and Management, 20(1), 14–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brint, S., & Karabel, J. (1991). The diverted dream: Community colleges and the promise of educational opportunity in America, 1900–1985. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brint, S. G., Riddle, M., Turk-Bicakci, L., & Levy, C. S. (2005). From the liberal to the practical arts in American colleges and universities: Organizational analysis and curricular change. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(2), 151–180. doi: 10.1353/jhe.2005.0011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brint, S., Riddle, M., & Hanneman, R. a. (2006). Reference sets, identities, and aspirations in a complex organizational field: the case of American four-year colleges and universities. Sociology of Education, 79(3), 229–252. doi: 10.1177/003804070607900303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buchbinder, H., & Newson, J. (1990). Corporate-university linkages in Canada: transforming a public institution. Higher Education, 20(4), 355–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bucy, E. P. (1999). Formal features of cyberspace: relationships between web page complexity and site traffic. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(13), 1246–1256. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:13<1246::AID-ASI10>3.0.CO;2-E.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burawoy, M. (2005). For public sociology 2004 presidential address. American Sociological review, 70(February), 4–28. doi: 10.1177/000312240507000102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carroll, W., & Beaton, J. (2000). Globalization, neo-liberalism and the changing face of corporate hegemony in higher education. Studies in Political Economy, 62, 71–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark, B. R. (1983). The higher education system: Academic organization in cross-national perspective. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  12. Clayton, M. J., Cavanagh, K. V., & Hettche, M. (2012). Institutional branding: a content analysis of public service announcements from American universities. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 22(2), 182–205. doi: 10.1080/08841241.2012.737869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coates, K. S., & Morrison, B. (2013). Campus confidential: 100 startling things you don’t know about Canadian universities. Toronto: James Lorimer & Company Ltd.Google Scholar
  14. Constantinides, E., & Zinck Stagno, M. C. (2011). Potential of the social media as instruments of higher education marketing: a segmentation study. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 21(1), 7–24. doi: 10.1080/08841241.2011.573593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Côté, J. E., & Allahar, A. (2007). Ivory tower blues: A university system in crisis. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  16. Côté, J. E., & Allahar, A. (2011). Lowering higher education: The rise of corporate universities and the fall of liberal education. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  17. Creswell, J., & Clark, V. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Davidson, C. (2015). The university corporatization shift: a longitudinal analysis of university admission handbooks, 1980 to 2010. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 45(2), 193–213.Google Scholar
  19. Davies, S. (2009). Drifting apart? The institutional dynamics awaiting public sociology in Canada. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 34(3), 623–54.Google Scholar
  20. Davies, S., & Hammack, F. M. (2005). The channeling of student competition in higher education: comparing Canada and the U.S. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(1), 89–106. doi: 10.1353/jhe.2005.0003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Davies, S., Maldonado, V., & Zarifa, D. (2014). Effectively maintaining inequality in Toronto: predicting student destinations in Ontario universities. Canadian Review of Sociology, 51(1), 22–53. doi: 10.1111/cars.12032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Davies, S., & Zarifa, D. (2012). The stratification of universities: structural inequality in Canada and the United States. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 30(2), 143–158. doi: 10.1016/j.rssm.2011.05.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Davies, S. & Pizarro Milian, R. (2016). Maintaining status in new times: The continuing stratification of Anglo-American Universities. Routledge Handbook of the Sociology of Higher Education, James Côté and Andy Furlong (Eds.). Roudlege / London, UK.Google Scholar
  24. Dill, D. D., & Soo, M. (2005). Academic quality, league tables, and public policy: a cross-national analysis of university ranking systems. Higher Education. doi: 10.1007/s10734-004-1746-8.Google Scholar
  25. DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.Google Scholar
  26. Geissler, G., Zinkhan, G., Watson, R. T. (2001). Web home page complexity and communication effectiveness. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2, Paper 2.Google Scholar
  27. Giroux, H. (1999). Vocationalizing higher education: schooling and the politics of corporate culture. College Literature, 26(3), 147–161.Google Scholar
  28. Giroux, H. (2013). The Corporate war against higher education. Workplace. A Journal for Academic Labor,103–117. http://doi.org/ 10.1007/s00439-002-0842-z.
  29. Gross, N. (2002). Becoming a pragmatist philosopher: status, self-concept, and intellectual choice. American Sociological Review, 67(1), 52–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ha, L., & James, E. L. (1998). Interactivity reexamined: a baseline analysis of early business web sites. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 42, 457–474. doi: 10.1080/08838159809364462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Harris, M. S. (2009). Message in a bottle: university advertising during bowl games. Innovative Higher Education, 33(5), 285–296. doi: 10.1007/s10755-008-9085-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hartley, M., & Morphew, C. (2008). What’s being sold and to what end?: a content analysis of college viewbooks. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(6), 671–691. doi: 10.1353/jhe.0.0025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hazelkorn, E. (2015). Rankings and the reshaping of higher education: The battle for world-class excellence (2nd ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillian.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hemsley-Brown, J., & Oplatka, I. (2006). Universities in a competitive global marketplace: a systematic review of the literature on higher education marketing. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(4), 316–338. doi: 10.1108/09513550610669176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hermanowicz, J. C. (2005). Classifying universities and their departments: a social world perspective. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(1), 26–55. doi: 10.1353/jhe.2005.0005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Heslop, L. A., & Nadeau, J. (2010). Branding MBA programs: the use of target market desired outcomes for effective brand positioning. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 20. http://doi.org/ 10.1080/08841241003788110.
  37. Hite, R. E., & Yearwood, A. (2001). A content analysis of college and university viewbook (brochures). College and University, 76(3), 17–21.Google Scholar
  38. Holloway, D. J., & Holloway, D. A. (2005). University Logos and the Commoditisation of Higher Education. In ANZMAC 2005 Conference: Corporate Responsibility (pp. 34–40). Fremantle, WA. Retrieved from http://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/7950/1/University_logos.pdf.
  39. Hölscher, C., & Strube, G. (2000). Web search behavior of internet experts and newbies. Computer Networks, 33(1), 337–346. doi: 10.1016/S1389-1286(00)00031-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jansen, B. J., Spink, A., & Saracevic, T. (2000). Real life, real users, and real needs: a study and analysis of user queries on the Web. Information Processing and Management, 36(2), 207–227. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4573(99)00056-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 602–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kirp, D. (2009). Shakespeare, Einstein, and the bottom line: The marketing of higher education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Kirst, M., & Stevens, M. L. (Eds.). (2015). Remaking college: The changing ecology of higher education. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Kraatz, M. S., & Zajac, E. J. (1996). Exploring the limits of the new institutionalism: the causes and consequences of illegitimate organizational change. American Sociological Review, 61(5), 812–836. doi: 10.2307/2096455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lacroix, R., & Maheu, L. (2015). Leading research universities in a competitive academic world. Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Liu, C., Arnett, K. P., Capella, L. M., & Beatty, R. C. (1997). Web sites of the fortune 500 companies: facing customers through home pages. Information and Management, 31(6), 335–345. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7206(97)00001-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Marginson, S. (2006). Dynamics of national and global competition in higher education. Higher Education, 52(1), 1–39. doi: 10.1007/s10734-004-7649-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McLaughlin, N. (2005). Canada’s impossible science: historical and institutional origins of the coming crisis in Anglo-Canadian sociology. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 30(1), 1–40. doi: 10.1353/cjs.2005.0026.Google Scholar
  49. McLaughlin, N. (2014). Canadian uniqueness and theoretical-methodological pluralism in sociology. Canadian Review of Sociology, 51(4), 402–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Metcalfe, A. S. (2010). Revisiting academic capitalism in Canada: no longer the exception. The Journal of Higher Education, 81(4), 489–514. doi: 10.1353/jhe.0.0098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340. doi: 10.1086/226550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mizruchi, M. S., & Fein, L. C. (1999). The social construction of organizational knowledge: a study of the uses of coercive, mimetic, and normative isomorphism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 653–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Newson, J. a. (1994). Subordinating democracy: the effects of fiscal retrenchment and university-business partnerships on knowledge creation and knowledge dissemination in universities. Higher Education, 27(2), 141–161. doi: 10.1007/BF01384086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nicholls, J., Harris, J., Morgan, E., Clarke, K., & Sims, D. (1995). Marketing higher education: the MBA experience. International Journal of Educational Management, 9(2), 31–38. doi: 10.1108/09513549510082369.Google Scholar
  55. Opoku, R., Abratt, R., & Pitt, L. (2006). Communicating brand personality: are the websites doing the talking for the top South African Business Schools? Journal of Brand Management, 14(1/2), 20–39. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.bm.2550052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pizarro Milian, R. & Quirke, L. (in press). Alternative pathways to legitimacy: promotional practises in the Ontario for-profit college sector. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, in press.Google Scholar
  57. Pizarro Milian, R., & Hicks, M. (2014). Ontario private career colleges: An exploratory analysis. Toronto, Ontario: Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario.Google Scholar
  58. Pizarro Milian, R., Davies, S., & Zarifa, D. (2016). Barriers to differentiation: applying organization studies to Ontario higher education. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 46(1), 19–37.Google Scholar
  59. Puddephatt, A., & McLaughlin, N. (2015). Critical nexus or pluralist discipline? Institutional ambivalence and the future of Canadian sociology. Canadian Review of Sociology, 52(3), 310–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Puddephatt, A., & Nelsen, R. W. (2010). The promise of a sociology degree in Canadian higher education. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue Canadienne de Sociologie, 47(4), 405–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Quirke, L. (2009). Legitimacy through alternate means: schools without professionals in the private sector. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 30(5), 621–634. doi: 10.1080/01425690903115809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Quirke, L. (2013). Rogue resistance: sidestepping isomorphic pressures in a patchy institutional field. Organization Studies, 34(11), 1675–1699. doi: 10.1177/0170840613483815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Quirke, L., & Davies, S. (2002). The new entrepreneurship in higher education the impact of tuition increases at an Ontario university. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 32(3), 85–109.Google Scholar
  64. Rhoades, G., & Slaughter, S. (1997). Academic capitalism, managed professionals, and supply-side higher education. Social Text, 51, 9–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Shanahan, T., & Jones, G. A. (2007). Shifting roles and approaches: government coordination of post‐secondary education in Canada, 1995–2006. Higher Education Research and Development. doi: 10.1080/07294360601166794.Google Scholar
  66. Singh, S. N., Dalal, N., & Spears, N. (2005). Understanding web home page perception. European Journal of Information Systems, 14(3), 288–302. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore Johns Hopkins University Press, 296.Google Scholar
  68. Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (2001). Expanding and elaborating the concept of academic capitalism. Organization, 8(2), 154–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Slaughter, S., & Rhodes, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  70. Thelwall, M. (2002). The top 100 linked-to pages on UK university web sites: high in link counts are not usually associated with quality scholarly content. Journal of Information Science, 28(6), 483–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tobolowsky, B. F., & Lowery, J. W. (2014). Selling college: a longitudinal study of American college football bowl game public service announcements. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 24(1), 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Turner, S. P., & Turner, J. H. (1990). The impossible science: An institutional analysis of American sociology. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  73. Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Weingarten, H., Hicks, M., Jonker, L., Liu, S. (2013). The Diversity of Ontario’s Universities: A Dataset to Inform the Differentiation Discussion. Toronto, Ontario. Retrieved from http://www.heqco.ca/SiteCollectionDocuments/HEQCODiversity_ENG.pdf.
  75. Yoo, S., & Jin, J. (2004). Evaluation of the home page of the top 100 university websites. Allied Academies International Conference Academy of Information and Management Sciences Proceedings, 8(2), 57–60.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations