Advertisement

The American Sociologist

, Volume 47, Issue 1, pp 102–114 | Cite as

Moving from Urban Sociology to the Sociology of the City

Article

Abstract

Castell’s claim that urban sociology has no subject matter has yet to be refuted. In this article, I argue that urban sociology should be understood as the sociology of the city. Rather than focusing on social problems within an urban context, urban sociologists need to treat the city as an autonomous social unit. The main task for the sociology of the city is to explain similarities and differences across individual cities and urban groups and to identify how these affect social life and collectivities. I illustrate this argument by exploring the urban production of trust. Treating the city as the unit of analysis, I show how trust matters for cities and how cities produce trust.

Keywords

Urban sociology Sociology of the city The city Trust 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I thank Terry Clark, Sean Lauer, Lawrence Nichols and Rima Wilkes for their insightful comments and useful suggestions on earlier drafts. I also thank the Laboratory for Comparative Social Research at the Higher School of Economics (funded by a subsidy from the Government of the Russian Federation for the implementation of the Global Competitiveness Program).

References

  1. Abbott, A. (1999). Department & discipline: Chicago sociology at one hundred. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ackroyd, P. (2001). London: The biography. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  3. Amin, A. (2007). Re‐thinking the urban social. City, 11(1), 100–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, E. (2000). Code of the street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  5. Appleyard, D., & Lintell, M. (1986). The environmental quality of city Streets: The residents’ viewpoint. In E. D. Boer (Ed.), Social aspects of transport planning (pp. 93–120). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bakker, L., & Dekker, K. (2012). Social trust in urban neighbourhoods: the effect of relative ethnic group position. Urban Studies, 49(10), 2031–2047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Batty, M. (2008). The size, scale, and shape of cities. Science, 319(5864), 769–771.Google Scholar
  8. Becker, H. (1999). The Chicago school, so-called. Qualitative Sociology, 22(1), 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Best, J. (2001). Giving it away: the ironies of sociology’s place in academia. The American Sociologist, 32(1), 107–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bridges, F. S., & Rodriguez, W. I. (2000). Gay-friendly affiliation, community size, and color of address in return of lost letters. North American Journal of Psychology, 2(1), 39–46.Google Scholar
  11. Bridges, F. S., Welsh, R. L., Graves, B. S., & Sonn, M. B. (1997). Differences in lost letter and postal card returns from cities and smaller urban communities. Psychological Reports, 80(2), 363–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bulmer, M. (1986). The Chicago school of sociology: Institutionalization, diversity, and the rise of sociological research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Burgess, E. W. (1925). The growth of the city: An introduction to a research project. In R. E. Park & Burgess (Eds.), The city: Suggestions for the investigation of human behavior in the city environment (pp. 49–60). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Castells, M. (1968). Is there an urban sociology? Sociologie du Travail, 10(1), 72–90.Google Scholar
  15. Castells, M. (1977). The urban question: A Marxist approach. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  16. Castells, M. (1983). The city and the grassroots: A cross-cultural theory of urban social movements (No. 7). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  17. Castells, M. (2002). Conclusion: Urban sociology in the twenty-first century. In I. Susser (Ed.), The Castells reader on cities and social theory (pp. 390–406). Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  18. Clark, T. N. (Ed.). (2004). The city as an entertainment machine. Amsterdam: Elsevier/JAI.Google Scholar
  19. Clark, T. N. (2012). Urban theory as context specification. American Sociological Association CUSS News Letter, 25(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
  20. Clark, T. N. (2014). Can Tocqueville karaoke? Global contrasts of citizen participation, the arts and development. Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Clark, T. N., Lloyd, R., Wong, K. K., & Jain, P. (2002). Amenities drive urban growth. Journal of Urban Affairs, 24(5), 493–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Delhey, J., & Newton, K. (2003). Who trusts?: the origins of social trust in seven societies. European Societies, 5(2), 93–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dewey, R. (1960). The rural–urban continuum: real but relatively unimportant. American Journal of Sociology, 66, 60–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Duneier, M. (1999). Sidewalk. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.Google Scholar
  25. Durkheim, E. (1893). The division of labor in society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  26. Durkheim, E. (1982). The rules of sociological method. New York: Free Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class. Cambridge: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  28. Florida, R. (2014). The rise of the creative class–revisited: Revised and expanded. Cambridge: Basic books.Google Scholar
  29. Fong, E., & Wilkes, R. (2003). Racial and ethnic residential patterns in Canada. Sociological Forum, 18(4), 577–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  31. Gans, H. J. (2009). Some problems of and futures for urban sociology: toward a sociology of settlements. City & Community, 8(3), 211–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gieryn, T. F. (2000). A space for place in sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 463–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Glaeser, E. L., & Resseger, M. G. (2010). The complementarity between cities and skills*. Journal of Regional Science, 50(1), 221–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Glaeser, E. L., Laibson, D. I., Scheinkman, J. A., & Soutter, C. L. (2000). Measuring trust. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 811–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gottdiener, M., & Feagin, J. R. (1988). The paradigm shift in urban sociology. Urban Affairs Review, 24(2), 163–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Grannis, R. (1998). The importance of trivial streets: residential streets and residential segregation. American Journal of Sociology, 103(6), 1530–1564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Grannis, R. (2005). T‐Communities: pedestrian street networks and residential segregation in Chicago, Los Angeles, and New York. City & Community, 4(3), 295–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Grodach, C., & Loukaitou‐Sideris, A. (2007). Cultural development strategies and urban revitalization: a survey of US cities. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 13(4), 349–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hampton, K. N., & Gupta, N. (2008). Community and social interaction in the wireless city: wi-fi use in public and semi-public spaces. New Media & Society, 10(6), 831–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hampton, K. N., & Wellman, B. (2000). Examining community in the digital neighborhood: early results from Canada’s wired suburb. In Ishida, T., & Isbister, K. (Eds) Digital cities: technologies, experiences, and future perspectives (No. 1765). (pp. 194-208). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
  42. Hampton, K., & Wellman, B. (2003). Neighboring in Netville: how the Internet supports community and social capital in a wired suburb. City & Community, 2(4), 277–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Harvey, D. (1985). The urbanization of capital: Studies in the history and theory of capitalist urbanization (Vol. 2). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Hauser, P. M. (1965). Observations on the urban-folk and urban–rural dichotomies as forms of Western ethnocentrism. In P. M. Hauser & L. F. Schnore (Eds.), The study of urbanisation (pp. 503–517). London: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  45. Jacobs, J. (1961). The life and death of great American cities. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  46. Jeong, H. (2015). Re-thinking public transit as a node for walking city: comparative study of transit zone in Chicago, Seoul, and Paris. PhD dissertation proposal, Illinois Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  47. Jones, C. (2006). Paris: The biography of a city. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  48. Karp, D. A., Stone, G. P., & Yoels, W. C. (1977). Being urban: A social psychological view of city life. Lexington: Heath and Company.Google Scholar
  49. Kemeny, J. (1982). A critique and reformulation of the new urban sociology. Acta Sociologica, 25(4), 419–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Klinenberg, E. (2001). Dying alone: the social production of urban isolation. Ethnography, 2(4), 501–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Klinenberg, E. (2003). Heat wave: A social autopsy of disaster in Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  52. Lauer, S. R. (2008). Exchange relationships in inshore fisheries. Sociological Forum, 23(3), 503–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Le Gales, P. (2005). Interesting times for urban sociology. Sociology, 39(2), 347–352.Google Scholar
  54. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (Vol. 142). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  55. Levin, A. (2014). Toronto: Biography of a city. Vancouver: Douglas & Mclntyre.Google Scholar
  56. Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. (1985). Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63(4), 967–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lloyd, R., & Clark, T. N. (2001). The city as an entertainment machine. Critical Perspectives on Urban Redevelopment, 6(3), 357–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Logan, J. R., & Molotch, H. L. (2007). Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  59. Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power: Two works by Niklas Luhmann. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  60. Luhmann, N. (2000). Familiarity, confidence, trust: Problems and alternatives. In Gambetta, D. (ed.) Trust: making and breaking cooperative relations (pp. 94–107). Electronic edition, Department of Sociology, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  61. Magee, W., Fong, E., & Wilkes, R. (2008). Neighbourhood ethnic concentration and discrimination. Journal of Social Policy, 37(01), 37–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. May, T., & Perry, B. (Eds.) (2005). The future of urban sociology. Sociology, 39(2), 343–370.Google Scholar
  63. Mewes, J., & Mau, S. (2013). Globalization, socio-economic status and welfare chauvinism: European perspectives on attitudes toward the exclusion of immigrants. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 54(3), 228–245.Google Scholar
  64. Milgram, S., Mann, L., & Harter, S. (1965). The lost-letter technique: a tool of social research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 29(3), 437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Molotch, H. (1976). The city as a growth machine: toward a political economy of place. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 309–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Molotch, H., & Logan, J. (1987). Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  67. Nichols, L. T. (2012). North Central Sociological Association presidential address. Renewing sociology: integral science, solidarity, and loving kindness. Sociological Focus, 45(4), 261–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Pahl, R. E. (1966). The rural–urban continumm. Sociologia Ruralis, 6(3), 299–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Park, R. E. (1915). The city: suggestions for the investigation of human behavior in the city environment. The American Journal of Sociology, 20(5), 577–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Park, R. E., Burgess, E. W., & McKenzie, R. D. (1925). The city. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1, 925Google Scholar
  71. Paxton, P. (2007). Association memberships and generalized trust: a multilevel model across 31 countries. Social Forces, 86(1), 47–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Peck, J. (2005). Struggling with the creative class. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29(4), 740–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Perry, B., & Harding, A. (2002). The future of urban sociology: report of joint sessions of the British and American Sociological Associations. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 26(4), 844–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Putnam, R. D. (2001). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  76. Reissman, L. (1970). The urban process. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
  77. Robinson, J. (2006). Ordinary cities: Between globalization and modernity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  78. Rothstein, B., & Uslaner, E. M. (2005). All for all: equality, corruption, and social trust. World Politics, 58(01), 41–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sampson, R. J. (2012). Great American city: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918–924.Google Scholar
  81. Sassen, S. (2000). New frontiers facing urban sociology at the Millennium. The British Journal of Sociology, 51(1), 143–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Sassen, S. (2001). The global city: NewYork, London, Tokyo. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Sassen, S. (2005). Cities as strategic sites. Sociology, 39(2), 352–357.Google Scholar
  84. Sassen, S. (2010). The city: its return as a lens for social theory. City, Culture and Society, 1(1), 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Saunders, P. (1981). Social theory and the urban question. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  86. Scott, A. J., & Storper, M. (2014). The nature of cities: the scope and limits of urban theory. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12134.
  87. Silver, N. (2015). The most diverse cities are often the most segregated. Retrieved from http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-most-diverse-cities-are-often-the-most-segregated/, May 6th, 2015.
  88. Silver, D., & Clark, T. N. (2010). Scenes: social context in an age of contingency. Social Forces, 88(5), 2293–2324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Silver, D., & Clark, T. N. (2015). The power of scenes: quantities of amenities and qualities of places. Cultural Studies, 29(3), 425–449.Google Scholar
  90. Simmel, G. (1950). The sociology of Georg Simmel (Vol. 92892). New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  91. Sjoberg, G. (1959). Comparative urban sociology. In R. K. Merton, L. Broom, & L. S. Cottrell Jr. (Eds.), Sociology today: Problems and prospects (pp. 334–359). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  92. Small, M. L. (2004). Villa Victoria: The transformation of social capital in a Boston barrio. Chicgao: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Small, M. L. (2008). Four reasons to abandon the idea of “The Ghetto”. City & community, 7(4), 389–398.Google Scholar
  94. Sorokin, P. A. (1962). Society, culture, and personality: Their structure and dynamics. New York: Cooper Square Publishers.Google Scholar
  95. Sorokin, P. A., & Zimmerman, C. C. (1929). Principles of rural–urban sociology. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
  96. Storper, M., & Scott, A. J. (2009). Rethinking human capital, creativity and urban growth. Journal of Economic Geography, 9(2), 147–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Sugrue, T. J. (2014). The origins of the urban crisis: Race and inequality in postwar Detroit. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Tönnies, F. (1955). Community and association :(Gemeinschaft und gesellschaft). London: Routledge & Paul.Google Scholar
  99. Turner, J. H. (2006). American sociology in chaos: differentiation without integration. The American Sociologist, 37(2), 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Wacquant, L. (2008). Urban outcasts: A comparative sociology of advanced marginality. London: Polity.Google Scholar
  101. Walton, J. (1993). Urban sociology: the contribution and limits of political economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 19, 301–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Weber, M. (1958). The city. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  103. Wilkes, R. (2011). Re-thinking the decline in trust: a comparison of black and white Americans. Social Science Research, 40(6), 1596–1610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Wilkes, R. (2015). We trust in government, just not in yours: race, partisanship, and political trust, 1958–2012. Social Science Research, 49, 356–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Wilkes, R., & Iceland, J. (2004). Hypersegregation in the twenty-first century. Demography, 41(1), 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Wilson, W. (1987). The truly disadvantaged. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  107. Wirth, L. (1938). Urbanism as a way of life. American Journal of Sociology, 44, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Zukin, S. (1980). A decade of the new urban sociology. Theory and Society, 9(4), 575–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Zukin, S. (1998). Urban lifestyles: diversity and standardisation in spaces of consumption. Urban studies, 35(5–6), 825–839.Google Scholar
  110. Zukin, S. (2011). Is there an urban sociology? Questions on a field and a vision. Sociologica, 3, 1–18.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations