The American Sociologist

, Volume 47, Issue 1, pp 115–130 | Cite as

How Ideology Has Hindered Sociological Insight

  • Chris C. MartinEmail author


American sociology has consistently leaned toward the political Left. This ideological skew hinders sociological insight in three ways. First, the scope of research projects is constrained: sociologists are discouraged from touching on taboo topics and ideologically unpalatable facts. Second, the data used in sociological research have been limited. Sociologists neglect data that portray conservatives positively and liberals negatively. Data are also truncated to hide facts that subvert a liberal narrative. Third, the empathic understanding of non-liberal ideologies is inhibited. Sociologists sometimes develop the erroneous belief that they understand alternative ideologies, and they fail to explore non-liberal ways of framing sociological knowledge. Some counterarguments may be raised against these theses, and I address such counterarguments.


Sociology of knowledge Sociology of ideas American sociology Ideology Methodology 



I thank John Boli and Christian Smith for their comments on earlier drafts.


  1. Albert, P. R. (2010). Epigenetics in mental illness: hope or hype? Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience : JPN, 35(6), 366–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allport, G. W. (1954). The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
  3. Bartels, L. M. (2006). What’s the matter with “What’s the matter with Kansas?” Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 1(2), 201–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumeister, R. F. (2010). Social Psychologists and Thinking About People. In R. F. Baumeister & E. J. Finkel (Eds.), Advanced Social Psychology:The State of the Science (pp. 5–24). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Benforado, A., & Hanson, J. (2012). Attributions and Ideologies: Two Divergent Visions of Behavior Behind Our Laws, Policies, and Theories. In J. Hanson (Ed.), Ideology, Psychology, and Law (pp. 298–338). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berlin, I. (1978). Karl Marx: His Life and Environment. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Birch, S. A. J. (2005). When knowledge is a curse children’s and adults’ reasoning about mental states. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(1), 25–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Birch, S. A. J., & Bloom, P. (2007). The curse of knowledge in reasoning about false beliefs. Psychological Science, 18(5), 382–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Black, D. (2000). Dreams of pure sociology. Sociological Theory, 18(3), 343–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brandt, M. J., Reyna, C., Chambers, J. R., Crawford, J. T., & Wetherell, G. (2014). The ideological-conflict hypothesis intolerance among both liberals and conservatives. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(1), 27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burawoy, M. (2002). “Personal Statement (for Candidacy as President-Elect).” Footnotes (March). Retrieved (
  13. Calhoun, C., & VanAntwerpen, J. (2007). Orthodoxy, Heterodoxy, and Hierarchy: ‘Mainstream’ Sociology and Its Challengers. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Sociology in America: A History (pp. 367–410). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cardiff, C. F., & Klein, D. B. (2005). Faculty partisan affiliations in all disciplines: a voter‐registration study. Critical Review, 17(3–4), 237–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carey, N. (2012). The Epigenetics Revolution: How Modern Biology Is Rewriting Our Understanding of Genetics, Disease, and Inheritance. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Carney, D. R., Jost, J. T., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2008). The secret lives of liberals and conservatives: personality profiles, interaction styles, and the things they leave behind. Political Psychology, 29(6), 807–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chorba, C. (2001). The danger of federalizing hate crimes: congressional misconceptions and the unintended consequences of the hate crimes prevention Act. Virginia Law Review, 87(2), 319–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cole, S. (2001). Introduction: The Social Construction of Sociology. In S. Cole (Ed.), What’s Wrong With Sociology? (pp. 7–36). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Deflem, M. (2005). “Public Sociology, Hot Dogs, Apple Pie, and Chevrolet.” Journal of Professional and Public Sociology, 1(1), Article 4.Google Scholar
  20. DeNavas-Walt, C., Proctor, B. D., Smith, J. C. (2012). Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2011. Washington, DC. Retrieved May 10, 2013 (
  21. Felson, R. B. (2001). Blame Analysis: Accounting for the Behavior of Protected Groups. In S. Cole (Ed.), What’s Wrong With Sociology? (pp. 223–246). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. Fiske, S. T. (2010). Envy up, scorn down: How comparison divides us. American Psychologist, 65(8), 698–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fiske, A. P., & Tetlock, P. E. (1997). Taboo trade-offs: reactions to transactions that transgress the spheres of justice. Political Psychology, 18(2), 255–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Folsom, F. (1994). Days of Anger, Days of Hope: A Memoir of the League of American Writers 1937–1942 (1st ed.). Niwot: University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
  25. Frank, T. (2004). What’s the Matter with Kansas?: How Conservatives Won the Heart of America. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
  26. Frank, T. (2008). “Class Is Dismissed.” Retrieved (
  27. Freeden, M. (1979). Eugenics and progressive thought: a study in ideological affinity. The Historical Journal, 22(3), 645–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gans, H. J. (2002). “Most of Us Should Become Public Sociologists.” Footnotes 30(6, July/August). Retrieved (
  29. Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., & Haidt, J. (2012). The moral stereotypes of liberals and conservatives: exaggeration of differences across the political spectrum. PLoS ONE, 7(12), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Graham, J., et al. (2013). Moral foundations theory: the pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 55–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Haidt, J. (2011). “The Bright Future of Post-Partisan Social Psychology.” 12th Annual Meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, San Antonio, TX. Retrieved (
  32. Haidt, J. (2013). The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  33. Haidt, J., Movius, H. (2012). “Moral Values and the Fiscal Cliff.” Washington Post, November 27. Retrieved (
  34. Harman, V. (2010). Experiences of racism and the changing nature of white privilege among lone white mothers of mixed-parentage children in the UK. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 33(2), 176–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hedström, P., & Swedberg, R. (1996). Social mechanisms. Acta Sociologica, 39(3), 281–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hodson, G., & Busseri, M. A. (2012). Bright minds and dark attitudes: lower cognitive ability predicts greater prejudice through right-wing ideology and low intergroup contact. Psychological Science, 23(2), 187–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hollander, P. (2013). Righteous political violence and contemporary western intellectuals. Terrorism and Political Violence, 25(4), 518–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jeffries, V. (2014). Altruism, Morality, and Social Solidarity as Field of Study. In V. Jeffriesm (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Altruism, Morality, and Social Solidarity: Formulating a Field of Study (pp. 3–20). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  39. Jussim, L. (2012a). Liberal privilege in academic psychology and the social sciences: commentary on Inbar & Lammers (2012). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(5), 504–507.Google Scholar
  40. Jussim, L. (2012b). Social Perception and Social Reality: Why Accuracy Dominates Bias and Self-Fulling Prophecy. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kanazawa, S. (2010). Why liberals and atheists are more intelligent. Social Psychology Quarterly, 73(1), 33–57.Google Scholar
  42. Keyes, C. L. M. (2009). The black–white paradox in health: flourishing in the face of social inequality and discrimination. Journal of Personality, 77(6), 1677–1706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kochhar, R., Taylor P., Richard, F. (2011). Wealth Gaps Rise to Record Highs between Whites, Blacks and Hispanics. Washinton, DC: Pew Research Center Washington, DC. Retrieved May 10, 2013 (
  44. Koslowski, B. (2013). Scientific Reasoning: Explanation, Confirmation Bias, and Scientific Practice. In G. J. Feist & M. E. Gorman (Eds.), Handbook of the Psychology of Science (pp. 151–192). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  45. Krueger, J. I., & Funder, D. C. (2004). Towards a balanced social psychology: causes, consequences, and cures for the problem-seeking approach to social behavior and cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(3), 313–327.Google Scholar
  46. Kutulas, J. (1990). Becoming ‘more liberal’: the league of American writers, the communist party, and the literary People’s Front. Journal of American Culture, 13(1), 71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kutulas, J. (1995). The Long War: The Intellectual People’s Front and Anti-Stalinism, 1930–1940. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2008). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  49. Laland, K. N., & Brown, G. R. (2011). Sense and Nonsense : Evolutionary Perspectives on Human Behaviour (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Langlois, R. (2008). The closing of the sociological mind? Canadian Journal of Sociology, 33(1), 134–148.Google Scholar
  51. Lengermann, P., & Niebrugge, G. (2007). Thrice Told: Narratives of Sociology’s Relation to Social Work. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Sociology in America: A History (pp. 63–114). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lewis, M. B. (2011). Who is the fairest of them all? Race, attractiveness and skin color sexual dimorphism. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(2), 159–162.Google Scholar
  53. Magen, E., Dweck, C. S., & Gross, J. J. (2008). The hidden-zero effect representing a single choice as an extended sequence reduces impulsive choice. Psychological Science, 19(7), 648–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mannheim, K. (1936). Ideology and Utopia: An Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge. San Diego: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  55. Markides, K. S., & Eschbach, K. (2005). Aging, migration, and mortality: current status of research on the Hispanic paradox. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 60(Special Issue 2), S68–S75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Martin, C. C., & Nezlek, J. B. (2014). The white ceiling heuristic and the underestimation of Asian-American income. PLOS ONE, 9(9), e108732.Google Scholar
  57. Marx, K. (1986). Karl Marx: A Reader. In J. Elster (Ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  58. McIntosh, P. (1990). White privilege: unpacking the invisible knapsack. Independent School, 49(2), 31–35.Google Scholar
  59. McLellan, D. (2006). Karl Marx: A Biography (4th ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Merton, R. K. (1973). The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  61. Mynatt, C. R., Doherty, M. E., & Tweney, R. D. (1978). Consequences of confirmation and disconfirmation in a simulated research environment. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30(3), 395–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nagel, J., Juan, V. S., & Mar, R. A. (2013). Lay denial of knowledge for justified true beliefs. Cognition, 129, 652–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. NBC News (2010). “Will Freshmen Crash Senate Republicans’ Party?” NBC News. Retrieved May 10, 2013 (
  64. Niemonen, J. (2010). Public sociology or partisan sociology? The curious case of whiteness studies. The American Sociologist, 41(1), 48–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Oswald, M. E., & Grosjean, S. (2004). Confirmation Bias. In R. F. Pohl (Ed.), Cognitive Illusions: A Handbook on Fallacies and Biases in Thinking, Judgement and Memory (pp. 79–96). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  66. Pembrey, M. E., et al. (2005). Sex-specific, male-line transgenerational responses in humans. European Journal of Human Genetics, 14(2), 159–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Pew Forum (2008). US Religious Landscape Survey. Washington: Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life. Retrieved May 10, 2013 (
  68. Pew Research Center (2013). The Rise of Asian Americans. Pew Research Center. Retrieved May 13, 2014 (
  69. Pinker, S. (2002). The Blank Slate : The Modern Denial of Human Nature. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  70. Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and Refutations. In Readings in the Philosophy of Science (Pp. 9–13). Mountain View: Mayfield.Google Scholar
  71. Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The power of personality: the comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(4), 313–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Royzman, E. B., Cassidy, K. W., & Baron, J. (2003). ‘I know, you know’: epistemic egocentrism in children and adults. Review of General Psychology, 7(1), 38–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rubenstein, W. B. (2003). The real story of U.S. hate crimes statistics: an empirical analysis. Tulane Law Review, 78, 1213–1245.Google Scholar
  74. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sadler, M. S., Correll, J., Park, B., & Judd, C. M. (2012). The world is not black and white: racial bias in the decision to shoot in a multiethnic context. Journal of Social Issues, 68(2), 286–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sakamoto, A., Goyette, K. A., & Kim, C. H. (2009). Socioeconomic attainments of Asian Americans. Annual Review of Sociology, 35(1), 255–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sakamoto, A., Takei, I., & Woo, H. (2012). The myth of the model minority myth. Sociological Spectrum, 32(4), 309–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Salmon, W. C. (1984). Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Shiao, J. L., Bode, T., Beyer, A., & Selvig, D. (2012). The genomic challenge to the social construction of race. Sociological Theory, 30(2), 67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Silva, E. B., & Forman, T. A. (2000). ‘I am not a racist but…’: Mapping white college students’ racial ideology in the USA. Discourse & Society, 11(1), 50–85.Google Scholar
  81. Singer, P. (2013). “Why Pay More?” Project Syndicate, May 9. Retrieved May 10, 2013 (
  82. Siy, J. O., & Cheryan, S. (2013). When compliments fail to flatter: American individualism and responses to positive stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(1), 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Smith, C. (2003). Moral, Believing Animals: Human Personhood and Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Smith, C. (2014). The Sacred Project of American Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Smith, C. (2015). To Flourish Or Destruct: A Personalist Theory of Human Goods, Motivations, Failure, and Evil. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Solomona, R. P., Portelli, J. P., Daniel, B.‐. J., & Campbell, A. (2005). The discourse of denial: how white teacher candidates construct race, racism and ‘white privilege.’. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(2), 147–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Sommers, C. H. (1994). Who Stole Feminism?: How Women Have Betrayed Women. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  88. Sorokin, P. A. (1965). Sociology of Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow. American Sociological Review, 833–43.Google Scholar
  89. Sperber, J. (2013). Karl Marx: A Nineteenth-Century Life. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  90. Strevens, M. (2006). Scientific Explanation. In D. M. Borchert (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy (pp. 518–527). Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA.Google Scholar
  91. Talhelm, T., et al. (2015). Liberals think more analytically (more ‘WEIRD’) than conservatives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(2), 250–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Tetlock, P. E., Kristel, O. V., Beth Elson, S., Green, M. C., & Lerner, J. S. (2000). The psychology of the unthinkable: taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 853–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Turner, S. (2013). American Sociology: From Pre-Disciplinary to Post-Normal. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Vaughan, D. (2002). Signals and Interpretive Work: The Role of Culture in a Theory of Practical Action. In K. A. Cerulo (Ed.), Culture in Mind: Toward a Sociology of Culture and Cognition (pp. 28–56). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  96. Veenendaal, M., et al. (2013). Transgenerational effects of prenatal exposure to the 1944–45 Dutch famine. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 120(5), 548–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Wallerstein, I. (1999). The heritage of sociology, the promise of social science. Current Sociology, 47(1), 1–37.Google Scholar
  98. Weber, M. (1946). Science as a Vocation. In H. H. Gerth & C. W. Mills (Eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (pp. 129–156). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  99. Wheen, F. (1999). Karl Marx: A Life. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  100. Yancey, G. A. (2011). Compromising Scholarship: Religious and Political Bias in American Higher Education. Waco: Baylor University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Emory UniversityAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations