Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How PSA’s Inclusion Shift Cracked the Ivory Tower Culture and Led to New Governance Challenges

  • Published:
The American Sociologist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

PSA’s shift to inclusion began in the 1990s as a response to the declining membership and the domination of the association by scholars from the Ivory Tower universities--those institutions focusing primarily upon research. Cracking the Ivory Tower refers to this inclusion which involved encouraging student participation; inviting faculty from teaching-focused colleges; expanding program topics on teaching or issues of gender, race, sexual orientation; hosting inclusive receptions; and electing some officers from non-elite schools. As inclusion has dramatically increased membership and promoted more representative participation, governance now faces new challenges, especially the executive director's workload.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jane Emery Prather.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prather, J.E. How PSA’s Inclusion Shift Cracked the Ivory Tower Culture and Led to New Governance Challenges. Am Soc 45, 219–225 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-014-9235-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-014-9235-8

Keywords

Navigation