The American Sociologist

, Volume 41, Issue 4, pp 390–399 | Cite as

Another View of Conventions



Conventions consist of conventionally accepted reasons for dereliction, deviation, distinction, or good fortune. Their use facilitates coordination of interpersonal effort through appeal to shared understandings that emerge from the push and pull of social interaction, but then constrain further rounds of that interaction. The use of conventions differs from three other well defined and widely used forms of reason giving: codes, technical accounts, and stories. All four do relational work, but conventions operate most easily and effectively when participants in social relations are simply confirming the character of those relations rather than establishing them anew, contesting them, terminating them, or transforming them. In those cases, participants are more likely to employ codes, technical accounts, or stories.


Conventions Explanations Social Relations Stories 


  1. Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, È. (1999). Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  2. Drew, P. (2003). Precision and exaggeration in interaction. American Sociological Review, 68, 917–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hardin, R. (2002). Street-level epistemology and democratic participation. Working Paper 2002/178, Instituto Juan March de Estudios e Investigaciones, Madrid.Google Scholar
  4. Tilly, C. (2006). Why? Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. White, H. (2001). Markets from networks: Socioeconomic models of production. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Zelizer, V. A. (2005). The purchase of intimacy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Columbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations