The American Sociologist

, Volume 41, Issue 2, pp 142–173 | Cite as

The Merton Theorem Revisited and Restated: Conservatism and Fascism as Functional Analogues



The paper revisits and restates the Merton Theorem of American religious conservatism (Puritanism) and European fascism (Nazism) as functional analogues. The original formulation the Merton Theorem identifies and describes them as functional analogues in nativism or nationalism through exclusion of and aggression against non-native out-groups. The paper offers an extended restatement of the Merton Theorem in which American conservatism and European fascism function as functional analogues in that both represent the model of a closed, or the antithesis to an open, society, of which nativism is a special case. In the extended Merton Theorem they are functional analogues specifically in terms of such indicators or dimensions of a closed society as political absolutism, closure and oppression, religious absolutism and nihilism, moral absolutism and repression, and extremism.


Merton theorem Conservatism Fascism Puritanism 


  1. Adorno, T., et al. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  2. Adorno, T. (2001). The stars down to earth and other essays in the irrational in culture. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Alexander, J. (1983). Theoretical logic in sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  4. Alexander, J. (1998). Neofunctionalism and after. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  5. Alexander, J., & Colomy, P. (Eds.). (1990). Differentiation theory and social change: comparative and historical perspectives. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Amenta, E., Bonastia, C., & Caren, N. (2001). US social policy in comparative and historical perspective: concepts, images, arguments, and research strategies. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 213–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Archer, R. (2001). Secularism and sectarianism in India and the west: what are the real lessons of American history? Economy and Society, 30, 273–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Arendt, H. (1951). The origins of totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  9. Bähr, P. (2002). Identifying the unprecedented: Hannah Arendt, totalitarianism, and the critique of sociology. American Sociological Review, 67, 804–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baltzell, D. (1979). Puritan Boston and quaker Philadelphia. New York: Free.Google Scholar
  11. Barnes, B. (2000). Understanding agency. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Barnett, W., & Woywode, M. (2004). From red Vienna to the Anschluss: ideological competition among Viennese newspapers during the rise of national socialism. American Journal of Sociology, 109, 1452–1499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bauman, Z. (1997). Postmodernity and its discontents. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Bauman, Z. (2000). Community. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  15. Bell, D. (1977). The return of the sacred? The argument on the future of religion. British Journal of Sociology, 28, 419–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bell, D. (Ed.). (2002). The radical right. New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
  17. Blinkhorn, M. (2003). Fascists and conservatives. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  18. Blomberg, B., & Harrington, J. (2000). A theory of rigid extremists and flexible moderates with an application to the U.S. congress. American Economic Review, 90, 605–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Boles, J. (1999). The southern way of religion. Virginia Quarterly Review, 75, 226–47.Google Scholar
  20. Bourdieu, P. (1998). Acts of resistance. New York: Free.Google Scholar
  21. Bourdieu, P. (2000). Pascalian meditations. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Bourdieu, P., & Haacke, H. (1995). Free exchange. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Bremer, F. (1995). The Puritan experiment. Hanover: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
  24. Brouwer, S. (1998). Authoritarian democracy. New York: Henry Holt and Co.Google Scholar
  25. Calhoun, C. (1993). Nationalism and ethnicity. Annual Review of Sociology, 19, 211–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Clemens, E. (2007). Toward a historicized sociology: theorizing events, processes, and emergence. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 527–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cochran, A. (2001). Democracy heading south. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  28. Coffey, J. (1998). Puritanism and liberty revisited: the case for toleration in the English revolution. The Historical Journal, 41, 961–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cohen, D. (2003). Our modern times. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
  30. Dahrendorf, R. (1979). Life chances. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Dunn, C., & Woodard, D. (1996). The conservative tradition in America. Lanham: Rowan & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  32. Edgell, P., Gerteis, J., & Hartmann, D. (2006). Atheists as other: moral boundaries and cultural membership in American society. American Sociological Review, 71, 211–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Eisenstadt, S. N. (1965). Transformation of social political, and cultural orders in modernization. American Sociological Review, 30, 659–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Eisenstadt, S. N. (Ed.). (1986). The origins and diversity of axial age civilizations. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  35. Elwood, C. (1999). The body broken. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Foerster, N. (1962). Image of America. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  37. Friedland, R. (2001). Religious nationalism and the problem of collective representation. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Friedland, R. (2002). Money, sex, and god: the erotic logic of religious nationalism. Sociological Theory, 20, 381–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Frijhoff, W. (2002). Religious toleration in the United provinces: From “case” to “model”. In H. Po-chia & H. van Nierop (Eds.), Calvinism and religious toleration in the Dutch golden age (pp. 27–53). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Fromm, E. (1941). Escape from freedom. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  41. German, J. (1995). The social utility of wicked self-love: calvinism, capitalism, and public policy in revolutionary New England. Journal of American History, 82, 965–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  43. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  44. Goldstone, J. (1986). State breakdown in the English revolution: a new synthesis. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 257–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Gorski, P. (2000). The mosaic moment: an early modernist critique of modernist theories of nationalism. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 1428–1468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Gorski, P. (2003). The disciplinary revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  47. Gould, P. (1996). Covenant and republic. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Gross, B. (1980). Friendly fascism. Boston: South End.Google Scholar
  49. Habermas, J. (2001). The postnational constellation. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
  50. Harley, D. (1996). Explaining Salem: Calvinist psychology and the diagnosis of possession. American Historical Review, 101, 306–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hartz, L. (1963). American historiography and comparative analysis: further reflections. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 5, 365–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Heller, H. (1986). The conquest of poverty. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  53. Holmwood, J. (1996). Founding sociology? London: Longman.Google Scholar
  54. Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. (1993). The dialectic of enlightenment. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  55. Hudson, K., & Coukos, A. (2005). The dark side of the protestant ethic: a comparative analysis of welfare reform. Sociological Theory, 23, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Hull, M. (1999). Censorship in America. Boulder: NetLibrary.Google Scholar
  57. Infantino, L. (2003). Ignorance and liberty. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  58. Inglehart, R. (Ed.). (2004). Human beliefs and values. México: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
  59. Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. (2000). Modernization, cultural change and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65, 19–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Jenness, V. (2004). Explaining criminalization: from demography and status politics to globalization and modernization. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 147–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Juergensmeyer, M. (1994). The new cold war? Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  62. Juergensmeyer, M. (2003). Terror in the mind of god. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  63. Kirkpatrick, C. (1937). Recent changes in the status of women and the family in Germany. American Sociological Review, 2, 650–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Kloppenberg, J. (1998). The virtues of liberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Krugman, P. (1997). What should trade negotiators negotiate about. Journal of Economic Literature, 35, 113–120.Google Scholar
  66. Lenski, G. (1994). Societal taxonomies: mapping the social universe. Annual Review of Sociology, 20, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Lindsay, M. (2008). Evangelicals in the power elite: elite cohesion advancing a movement. American Sociological Review, 73, 60–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Lipset, S. (1955). The radical right: A problem for American democracy. The British Journal of Sociology, 6, 176–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Lipset, S. (1969). Revolution and counterrevolution. London: Heineman.Google Scholar
  70. Lipset, S. (1996). American exceptionalism. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  71. Lipset, S., & Marks, G. (2000). It didn’t happen here. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  72. Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Manent, P. (1998). Modern liberty and its discontents. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  74. Mannheim, K. (1936). Ideology and Utopia. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
  75. Mannheim, K. (1967). Essays on the sociology of culture. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  76. Mannheim, K. (1986). Conservatism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  77. McCann, S. (2000). Gumshoe America. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  78. McLaughlin, N. (1996). Nazism, nationalism, and the sociology of emotions: escape from freedom revisited. Sociological Theory, 14, 241–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Merrill, L. (1945). The puritan policeman. American Sociological Review, 10, 766–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Merton, R. (1939). Review of Ray Billington. The Protestant Crusade, 1800–1860. American Sociological Review, 4, 436–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Merton, R. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free.Google Scholar
  82. Moore, B. (1993). Social origins of dictatorship and democracy. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  83. Munch, R. (2001). The ethics of modernity. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  84. Nisbet, R. (1966). The sociological tradition. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  85. Parsons, T. (1937). The structure of social action. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  86. Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. New York: Free.Google Scholar
  87. Parsons, T. (1967). Sociological theory and modern society. New York: Free.Google Scholar
  88. Parsons, T., & Smelser, N. (1965). Economy and society. New York: Free.Google Scholar
  89. Plotke, D. (2002). Introduction. In D. Bell (Ed.), The radical right (pp. vi–lxxvi). New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
  90. Popper, K. (1966). The open society and its enemies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  91. Pryor, F. (2002). The future of U.S. capitalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  92. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  93. Reuter, P. (2005). Review of drug war crimes: the consequences of prohibition. By Jeffrey A. Miron. Oakland: Independent Institute. Journal of Economic Literature, 43, 1075–1077.Google Scholar
  94. Savage, S. (1981). The theories of Talcott Parsons. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  95. Seed, J. (2005). The spectre of Puritanism: forgetting the seventeenth century in David Hume’s history of England. Social History, 30, 444–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Seligman, A. (1990). Inner-worldly individualism and the institutionalization of Puritanism in late seventeenth-century new England. The British Journal of Sociology, 41, 537–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Smelser, N. (1997). Problematics of sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  98. Smith, C. (2000). Christian America? Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  99. Sorokin, P. (1970). Social and cultural dynamics. Boston: Porter Sargent.Google Scholar
  100. Sprunger, K. (1982). Dutch Puritanism. Leiden: Brill Academic.Google Scholar
  101. Stivers, R. (1994). The culture of cynicism. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  102. Symonds, M., & Pudsey, J. (2006). The forms of brotherly love in Max Weber’s sociology of religion. Sociological Theory, 24, 133–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Tiryakian, E. (2002). Review of the ethics of modernity by Richard Munch. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 1629–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Turner, B. (2002). Sovereignty and emergency: political theology, Islam and American conservatism. Theory, Culture & Society, 19, 103–119.Google Scholar
  105. Van Dyke, V. (1995). Ideology and political choice. Chatham: Chatham House.Google Scholar
  106. Wagner, D. (1997). The new temperance. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  107. Walzer, M. (1963). Puritanism as a revolutionary ideology. History and Theory, 3, 59–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Zaret, D. (1989). Religion and the rise of liberal-democratic ideology in 17th century England. American Sociological Review, 54, 163–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Zaret, D. (1996). Petitions and the “invention” of public opinion in the English revolution. American Journal of Sociology, 101, 1497–1555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of North TexasDentonUSA

Personalised recommendations