The American Sociologist

, Volume 40, Issue 1–2, pp 51–60 | Cite as

Defining Deviance: John Kitsuse’s Modest Agenda

Article

Abstract

This article highlights and appreciates an often overlooked aspect of John Kitsuse’s work in the sociology of deviance. Years before he invented a new sociology of social problems, Kitsuse crafted theoretical and empirical statements that helped establish the “labeling” or “societal reaction” definition of, and perspective on, deviance. Kitsuse’s work was a key in the movement to forge labeling theory’s distinctively radical edge. At the same time that he pioneered new sociological territory, Kitsuse also resisted the conceptual slippage that plagued so many others working on the frontier.

Keywords

Deviance Labeling theory Social control Social problems Societal reaction Sociological theory 

References

  1. Becker, H. S. (1963). Outsiders: studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, H. S. (1973). Outsiders: studies in the sociology of deviance (with a new chapter, “labelling theory reconsidered”). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  3. Best, J. (2004). Deviance: career of a concept. Belmont: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  4. Debro, J. (1970). Dialogue with Howard S. Becker. Issues in Criminology, 5, 159–179.Google Scholar
  5. Erikson, K. T. (1962). Notes on the sociology of deviance. Social Problems, 9, 207–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gove, W. R. (1975). The labelling of deviance: evaluating a perspective. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Holstein, J. A. (1993). Court-ordered insanity: interpretive practice and involuntary commitment. Hawthorne: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  8. Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (2008). Handbook of constructionist research. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  9. Ibarra, P. R. (2008). Strict and contextual constructionism in the sociology of deviance and social problems. In J. A. Holstein, & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 355–369). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  10. Ibarra, P. R., & Kitsuse, J. I. (1993). Vernacular constituents of moral discourse: an interactionist proposal for the study of social problems. In J. Holstein, & G. Miller (Eds.), Reconsidering social constructionism (pp. 25–58). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  11. Ibarra, P. R., & Kitsuse, J. I. (2003). Claims-making discourse and vernacular resources. In J. A. Holstein, & G. Miller (Eds.), Challenges and choices: constructionist perspectives on social problems (pp. 17–50). Hawthorne: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  12. Katz, J. (1972). Deviance, charisma, and rule-defined behavior. Social Problems, 20, 186–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kitsuse, J. I. (1962). Societal reaction the deviant behavior: problems of theory and method. Social Problems, 9, 247–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kitsuse, J. I. (1975). The ‘new conception of deviance’ and its critics. In W. R. Gove (Ed.), The labelling of deviance: evaluating a perspective (pp. 381–392). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Kitsuse, J. I., & Cicourel, A. V. (1963). A note on the uses of official statistics. Social Problems, 11, 131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kitsuse, J. I., & Spector, M. (1973). Toward a sociology of social problems: social conditions, value judgments, and social problems. Social Problems, 20, 407–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kitsuse, J. I., & Spector, M. (1975). Social problems and deviance: some parallel issues. Social Problems, 22, 584–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lemert, E. (1951). Social pathology. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  19. Lemert, E. (1967). Human deviance, social problems, and social control. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  20. Pollner, M. (1974). Sociological and common-sense models of the labelling process. In R. Turner (Ed.), Ethnomethodology (pp. 27–40). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  21. Pollner, M. (1987). Mundane reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Rains, P. (1975). Imputations of deviance: a retrospective essay on the labeling perspective. Social Problems, 23, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Scheff, T. J. (1964). The societal reaction to deviance: ascriptive elements in the psychiatric screening of mental patients in a Midwestern State. Social Problems, 11, 401–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Scheff, T. J. (1966). Being mentally ill. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  25. Scheff, T. J. (1967). Social conditions for rationality: how urban and rural courts deal with the mentally ill. American Behavioral Scientist, 7, 21–27.Google Scholar
  26. Scheff, T. J. (1974). The labelling theory of mental illness. American Sociological Review, 39, 444–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Spector, M. (1976). Labeling theory in social problems: a young journal launches a new theory. Social Problems, 24, 69–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Spector, M., & Kitsuse, J. I. (1973). Social problems: a reformulation. Social Problems, 22, 145–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Spector, M., & Kitsuse, J. I. (1977 [1987]). Constructing social problems. Hawthorne: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  30. Woolgar, S., & Pawluch, D. (1985). Ontological gerrymandering. Social Problems, 32, 214–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social and Cultural SciencesMarquette UniversityMilwaukeeUSA

Personalised recommendations