Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Thirty Five Years of Viewing Sociology as an External Program Reviewer: A Dean’s Perspective on How Administrators View Sociology

  • Published:
The American Sociologist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The author, who has served as an external program reviewer for 17 sociology program reviews, gives his perspective on the views that academic administrators have of sociology. On the plus side, administrators view sociology as a discipline that teaches many students; values and incorporates diversity; produces research aimed at ameliorating societal problems; and is involved in interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary projects. On the negative side, administrators are likely to see sociology as (1) deficient in grants, research and peer reviewed publications; (2) deficient in rigor of curriculum; (3) contentious and non-collegial; (4) too ideological; (5) isolated within the college/university and not sufficiently involved in campus governance; (6) too focused on tenure track positions lost over the years; (7) not sufficiently involved with assessment of student learning outcomes and community service learning; and (8) unable to understand the values and priorities of academic institutions and administrators. The author offers some suggestions on how sociology can eliminate these deficiencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Academe (1993). American Association of University Professors. Report [on] Academic Freedom and Tenure: San Diego State University: An Administration’s Response to Fiscal Stress. March/April:94–118.

  • Berger, P. L. (2001). Sociology: A disinvitation? In S. Cole (Ed.), What’s wrong with sociology? (pp. 193–204). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. (1999). Diversity in sociology: Problem or solution? The American Sociologist, 30(3), 22–41 (Fall).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, S. C. (Ed). 2001. What’s wrong with sociology? New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

  • Felson, R. B. (2001). Blame analysis: Accounting for the behavior of protected groups. In S. Cole (Ed.), What’s wrong with sociology? (pp. 223–246). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohm, C. F. (2001). What do we mean by ‘Assessment’? In C. Hohm, & W. Johnson (Eds.), Assessing student learning in sociology (pp. 178–179). Washington: The American Sociological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohm, C. F. (2008). Sociology in the academy: How the discipline is viewed by deans (Pacific Sociological Association 2007 Presidential Address). Sociological Perspectives, 51(2), 235–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howery, C. B. (2001). Assessment: It’s the right thing to do. In C. Hohm, & W. Johnson (Eds.), Assessing student learning in sociology (pp. 4–9). Washington: The American Sociological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, J. (2001). Institutional Perspectives in Sociology. In S. Cole (Ed.), What’s wrong with sociology? (pp. 293–318). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S. M. (2001). The state of American sociology. In S. Cole (Ed.), What’s wrong with sociology? (pp. 247–270). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Los Angeles Times (1992). Sociology 7’ symbolizes feeling of betrayal at SDSU. by David Smollar. August 13:A1,A22.

  • Molotch, H. (2001). Going out. In S. Cole (Ed.), What’s wrong with sociology? (pp. 173–191). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, I. H., & Simpson, R. L. (2001). The transformation of the American Sociological Association. In S. Cole (Ed.), What’s wrong with sociology? (pp. 271–291). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, A. L. (2001). Disintegrated disciplines and the future of Sociology. In S. Cole (Ed.), What’s wrong with sociology? (pp. 85–97). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. H. (1989). The disintegration of American sociology: Pacific Sociological Association Presidential Address. Sociological Perspectives, 32(4), 419–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. H. (2006). American sociology in chaos: Differentiation without integration. The American Sociologist, 37(1), 15–29 (Summer).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. H., & Kim, K.-M. (2001). The disintegration of tribal solidarity among American sociologists: Implications for knowledge accumulation. The American Sociologist, 30(2), 5–20 (Spring).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. California State University, Dominguez Hills, Carson, CA, USA

    Charles F. Hohm

Authors
  1. Charles F. Hohm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles F. Hohm.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hohm, C.F. Thirty Five Years of Viewing Sociology as an External Program Reviewer: A Dean’s Perspective on How Administrators View Sociology. Am Soc 39, 130–137 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-008-9043-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-008-9043-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation