Abstract
The aim of this article is to encourage ongoing and close exegetical study of sociology’s theoretical texts. Attention is drawn to two instances where Talcott Parsons’ theory project seems to be at odds with itself. Both are related to his “first major synthesis” The Structure of Social Action (1937). The first concerns Parsons’ opening discussion of Crane Brinton’s question “Who now reads Spencer?” Parsons’ discussion of Spencer is examined and then compared and contrasted with what he later wrote in the “Introduction” to the 1961 reprint of Spencer’s The Study of Sociology. The second concerns Parsons’ problematic view of his contribution to social theory’s “secondary literature” and how this relates to his claims about “convergence.” The article notes that Parsons was trying to identify what he believed to be a new norm for social theory. Sociological theory, he believed, would from henceforth have to be formulated in terms of this newly emerging normative frame of reference.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Parsons, T. 1937. The Structure of Social Action-A Study in Social Theory with Special Reference to a Group of Recent European Writers (New York: The Free Press).
-. 1961. “Introduction” in H. Spencer The Study of Sociology (University of Michigan Press): pp. v–x.
— 1965. “Cause and Effect in Sociology” in D. Lerner Cause and Effect (New York: The Free Press): pp. 51–73.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wearne, B.C. Exegetical explorations: Parsons’ problematic aim. Am Soc 37, 31–38 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-006-1021-9
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-006-1021-9