The American Sociologist

, Volume 37, Issue 1, pp 32–50 | Cite as

Sociological competencies and business careers: Toward an expanded dialogue

  • Rachael A. Woldoff
  • Robert C. Litchfield
Article
  • 68 Downloads

Abstract

We use a cross-disciplinary approach and multiple sources of data to investigate and outline sources of comparative advantage that undergraduate sociological study provides to students who are preparing for careers in business. We identify and discuss three core competencies that sociology specifically develops in students—structural consciousness, scientific thinking, and appreciation for diversity. We argue that sociology contributes unique value by combining these three competencies. We also offer thoughts on ways in which sociologists could further enhance undergraduate curricula, such as through emphasizing aspects of these contributions in a more explicit fashion.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ashkanasy, N.M., and Jackson, C.R.A. 2001. “Organizational Culture and Climate.” In N. Anderson, D.S. Ones, H.K. Sinangil, and C. Viswesvaran (Eds.) Handbook of Industrial, Work, and Organizational Psychology (Vol. 2), 398–415. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  2. Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB). 2005. “Eligibility Procedures and Standards for Business Accreditation.” St. Louis, MO: AACSB International.Google Scholar
  3. Babbie, E. 2004. The Practice of Social Research (10th Ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson.Google Scholar
  4. Badaracco, J.L. 1997. Defining Moments: When Managers Must Choose between Right and Right. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  5. Barney, J.B. and Hesterly, W. 2006. Strategic Management and Competitive Advantage: Concepts and Cases (1st Ed.) Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Bohlander, G., and Snell, S. 2004. Managing Human Resources (13th Ed.). Mason, OH: Thomson South-Western.Google Scholar
  7. Bryman, A. 1984. “The Debate about Quantitative and Qualitative Research: A Question of Method or Epistemology.” British Journal of Sociology 35(1): 75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Byars, L.L., and Rue, L.W. 2004. Human Resource Management (7th Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.Google Scholar
  9. Champion, D.J. 2004. The Juvenile Justice System: Delinquency, Processing, and the Law (4th Ed.) Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  10. Chronicle of Higher Education. 2003. “Campuses with the Largest Enrollments, Fall 2000.” The Almanac of Higher Education. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Curry, T., Jiobu, R. and Schwirian, K. 2002. Sociology for the Twenty-First Century (3rd Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  12. David, F.R. 2004. Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases (10th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  13. Duster, T. 2003. Backdoor to Eugenics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Eberts, P., Howery, C.B., Berheide, C.W., Crittenden, K., Davis, R., Gamson, Z. and Wagenaar, T.C. 1991. Liberal Learning and the Sociology Major. Washington, D.C.: American Sociological Association.Google Scholar
  15. Eckberg, D., and Marx, J. 2005. “The Mouse That Roared? Article Publishing in Undergraduate Sociology Programs.” The American Sociologist 35(4): 58–78.Google Scholar
  16. Eppen, G.D., Gould, F.J., Schmidt, C.P., Moore, J.H. and Weatherford, L.R. 1998. Introductory Management Science (5th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  17. Farley, J.E. 2003. Sociology (5th Ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  18. Feldman, S. 1984. “Economic Individualism and American Public Opinion.” American Politics Quarterly 11:3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ferrell, O.C., Fraedrich, I, and Ferrell, L. 2005. Business Ethics: Ethical Decision Making and Cases (6th Ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  20. Galinsky, A.D. and Moskowitz, G.B. 2000. “Perspective-Taking: Decreasing Stereotype Expression, Stereotype Accessibility, and In-Group Favoritism.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78: 708–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gans, H.J. 1988. Middle American Individualism. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  22. George, J.M., and Jones, G.R. 2002. Understanding and Managing Organizational Behavior (3rd Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  23. Giddens, A., Duneier, M., and Appelbaum, R.P. 2003. Introduction to Sociology, 4th ed. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
  24. Gioia, D.A. 2002. “Business Education’s Role in the Crisis of Corporate Confidence.” Academy of Management Executive 16: 142–144.Google Scholar
  25. Greenberg, J., and Baron, R.A. 2003. Behavior in Organizations (8th Ed.) New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  26. Henslin, J.M. 2005. Sociology: A Down-to-Earth Approach (7th Ed.) Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  27. Hitt, M., Black, S., and Porter, L.W. 2004. Management (1st Ed.) New Jersey: Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
  28. Hofstede, G. 1980. “Motivation, Leadership, and Organization: Do American Theories Apply Abroad?” Organizational Dynamics Summer: 42-63.Google Scholar
  29. —. 1984. Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills, C.A.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  30. Ivanovich, J.M., Konopaske, R., and Matteson, M.T. 2005. Organizational Behavior and Management (7th Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.Google Scholar
  31. Keith, B., and Ender, M.G. 2004. “The Sociological Core: Conceptual Patterns and Idiosyncrasies in the Structure and Content of Sociology Textbooks, 1940-2000.” Teaching Sociology 32: 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Koertge, N. 2005. “A Bouquet of Scientific Values.” In N. Koertge (Ed.), Scientific Values and Civic Virtues: 9–24. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kornblum, W. and Julian, J. 2004. Social Problems (11th Ed.) New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  34. Kreitner, R., Kinicki, A. and Cole, N. 2003. Fundamentals of Organizational Behaviour: Key Concepts, Skills and Best Practices (1st Ed.) McGraw-Hill Ryerson.Google Scholar
  35. Lotz, R. 2005. Youth Crime in America: A Modern Synthesis. Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  36. Lyon, L. 1999. The Community in Urban Society. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  37. Macionis, J.J. 2004. Society: The Basics (7th Ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  38. Marchand, A., Demers, A., and Durand, P. 2005. “Do Occupation and Work Conditions Really Matter? A Longitudinal Analysis of Psychological Distress Experiences among Canadian Workers.” Sociology of Health and Illness 27(5): 602–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mathis, R., and Jackson, J.H. 2003. Human Resource Management (10th Ed.). Mason, OH: Thomson Southwestern.Google Scholar
  40. McKinney, K., Howery, C.B., Strand, K.J., Kain, E.L., and White, C. 2004. Liberal Learning and the Sociology Major Updated: Meeting the Challenge of Teaching Sociology in the Twenty-First Century. Washington: American Sociological Association.Google Scholar
  41. Mills, C. W. 1959. The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Noe, R.A., Hollenbeck, J.R., Gerhart, B., and Wright, P.M. 2003. Human Resource Management (4th Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.Google Scholar
  43. Pfeffer, J., and Fong, C.T. 2002. “The End of Business Schools? Less Success than Meets the Eye.” Academy of Management Learning and Education 1: 78–95.Google Scholar
  44. Porter, M.E. 1980. Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  45. Prahalad, C.K., and Hamel, G. 1990. “The Core Competence of the Corporation” Harvard Business Review 68(3): 79–91.Google Scholar
  46. Purvin, D.M., and Kain, E.L. 2005. “The Research Article as an Instrument of Active Learning for Teaching about Violence, Sexual Abuse, and Union Formation among Low-Income Families.” Teaching Sociology 33(3): 323–335.Google Scholar
  47. Regoli, R.M., and Hewitt, J.D. 2006. Delinquency and Society (6th Ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  48. Robbins, S.P. 2001. Organizational Behavior (9th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  49. Sanbonmatsu, D.M., Posavac, S.S., Kardes, F.R. and Mantel, S.P. 1998. “Selective Hypothesis Testing.” Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 5: 197–220.Google Scholar
  50. Schein, E. 2004. Organizational Culture and Leadership (3rd Ed.). New York: Wiley Publishers.Google Scholar
  51. Schmalleger, F. 2005. Criminology Today: An Integrative Introduction (4th Edition). Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  52. Scott, W.R. 2004. “Reflections on a Half-Century of Organizational Sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology 30: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stolte, J.F. 2000. “The Value of Socially Extrinsic vs. Intrinsic Outcomes: An Exploration of Americans from 1974 to 1994.” Social Behavior and Personality 28: 387–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. The Ohio State University. 2005. “Course Offerings Bulletin 2004-2005 for Spring.” Columbus: The Ohio State University, Retrieved February 2, 2005.Google Scholar
  55. Thompson, A.A., and Strickland, A.J. 2001. Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases (12th Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.Google Scholar
  56. Thompson, W.E. and Hickey, J.V. 2005. Society in Focus: An Introduction to Sociology (5th Ed.) Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  57. Tsoukas, H., and Vladimirou, E. 2001. “What is Organizational Knowledge?” Journal of Management Studies 38: 973–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. University of Texas. 2004. “Undergraduate Catalogue, 2004-2006.” Austin: University of Texas, Retrieved February 2, 2005.Google Scholar
  59. Wagenaar, T.C. 2004. “Is There a Core in Sociology? Results from a Survey.” Teaching Sociology 32(1): 1–18.Google Scholar
  60. Walton, M. 1986. The Deming Management Method. New York: Perigee Books.Google Scholar
  61. Wheelan, T. and Hunger, J.D. 2004. Strategic Management and Business Policy (9th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  62. Wikipedia contributors. 2005. “Scientific Thinking.” Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved October 21, 2005 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_thinking.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Transaction Publishers 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rachael A. Woldoff
    • 1
  • Robert C. Litchfield
    • 2
  1. 1.West Virginia UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Department of Economics & Business at Washington & Jefferson CollegeUSA

Personalised recommendations