Skip to main content

Democrats and republicans in anthropology and sociology: How do they differ on public policy issues?

Abstract

Within the fields of anthropology and sociology, how do Democrats and Republicans compare in their opinions on issues of economic regulation, personal choice, and the role of government? Using data from a survey of U.S. members of the American Anthropological Association and the American Sociological Association—with 701 respondents—we find that the differences generally fit the “liberal” and “conservative” stereotypes. Democrats are more permissive on drugs, prostitution, and immigration, while Republicans are more permissive on economic activity. The Democrats are more opposed to military action. However, our survey shows that both Democrats and Republicans are generally supportive or neutral on government activism. Our survey enables a kind of quantification of the differences between the Democrats and Republicans in the two academic fields examined.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Alston, Richard M., James R. Kearl, and Michael B. Vaughan. 1992. “Is there a consensus among economists in the 1990s? American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 82 (May): 203–209.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brookings Institution. 2001. “National Survey on Government Endeavors,” Prepared by Princeton Survey Research Associates, dated November 9, online at: http://www.brookings.edu/comm/reformwatch/rw04/ surveydata.pdf.

  3. Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. NY: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fuchs, Victor. R., Alan B. Krueger, and James M. Poterba. 1998. “Economists’ Views about Parameters, Values, and Policies: Survey Results in Labor and Public Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature 36(3): 1387–1425.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fuller, D. A., and D. Geide-Stevenson. 2003. “Consensus among economists: Revisited.” Journal of Economic Education 34(4): 369–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hamilton, Richard F. and Lowell L. Hargens. 1993. “The Politics of the Professors: Self-Identifications, 1969-1984.” Social Forces 71(3), March: 603–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kearl, J. R., Clayne L. Pope, Gordon C. Whiting, and Larry T. Wimmer. 1979. “A confusion of economists.” American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 69 (May): 28–37.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ladd, Everett Carll, Jr. and Seymour Martin Lipset. 1975. The Divided Academy: Professors & Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Light, Paul C. 2001. Government’s Greatest Priorities of the Next Half Century. Reform Watch, No. 4, Brookings Institution, December, online at: httpV/www.brookings.edu/dybdocroot/comm/reforrnwatch/ rwO4/rw4.pdf.

  10. Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1972. “The Politics of American Sociologist.” American Journal of Sociology 78(1), June: 67–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. —. 1982. “The Academic Mind at the Top: The Political Behavior and Values of Faculty Elites.” Public Opinion Quarterly 46(2), Summer: 143–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. —. 1994. “The State of American Sociology.” Sociological Forum 9(2), June: 199–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nakhaie, M. Reza, and Robert J. Brym. 1999. “The Political Attitudes of Canadian Professors.” Canadian Journal of Sociology 24(3): 329–353.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rothman, Stanley, S. Robert Lichter, and Neil Nevitte. 2005. “Politics and Professional Advancement among College Faculty.” The Forum 3(1).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

His interests are in public policy and social theory. He is the editor of What Do Economists Contribute? (Macmillan/Palgrave, 1999) and Reputation: Studies in the Voluntary Elicitation of Good Conduct (University of Michigan Press, 1997). He is the editor of the scholarly journal Econ Journal Watch.

Her areas of expertise are social movements and the sociology of religion. Her research has appeared in American Journal of Sociology, European Sociological Review, Acta Sociologica, and other professional journals.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klein, D.B., Stern, C. Democrats and republicans in anthropology and sociology: How do they differ on public policy issues?. Am Soc 35, 79–86 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-004-1025-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Median Voter
  • Military Action
  • Brookings Institution
  • Major Party
  • American Sociological Association