The American Sociologist

, Volume 35, Issue 4, pp 58–78 | Cite as

The mouse that roared? Article publishing in undergraduate sociology programs

  • Douglas Eckberg
  • Jonathan Marx
Article

Abstract

This paper explores article production by the entire population of US undergraduate sociology departments. The available literature suggests that undergraduate programs publish little, that this is concentrated among relatively few—mainly liberal arts—departments, and that publication rates are increasing. We argue There are reasons to expect that social/economic presence, reward policies, student quality, and faculty quality, size, and workload will affect productivity. Tracing publication of articles across the 1990s, few undergraduate departments are represented in 30 journals deemed important on the bases of reputation and citation rates. Liberal arts schools do not predominate. Ceteris paribus, public schools outpublished private schools. Publication rates have not increased. Social/economic presence, and student and faculty quality affect publishing, but salary, tenure structure, and workload do not. Finally, faculty size suppresses per capita publication.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Association of University Professors. 2001. “The Annual Report on the Economic Status of the Profession, 2000–2001.” Academe (March-April):50–91.Google Scholar
  2. -. 2002. “The Annual Report on the Economic Status of the Profession, 2001-2002.” Academe (March-April):44–87.Google Scholar
  3. American Sociological Association. 1999. Directory of Departments. Washington, DC: American Socio-logical Association. Retrieved December 21, 2004 (http://www.asanet.org/pubs/dod.html) Google Scholar
  4. —. 2004a. “The Number of Doctorates Awarded in Sociology, 1930-2001.” Washington, DC: American Sociological Association. Retrieved December 21, 2004 (http://www.asanet.org/research/ socdocsfig.html) Google Scholar
  5. —. 2004b. Guide to Graduate Departments of Sociology. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.Google Scholar
  6. —. 2004c. “Annual Sociology Graduate Enrollments by Full-and Part-Time Status and Gender, 1990–2001.” Washington, DC: American Sociological Association. Retrieved December 21, 2004 (http:// www. asanet. org/research/gradenrolgen. html) Google Scholar
  7. Baughman, James C, and Robert N. Goldman. 1999. “College Rankings and Faculty Publications.” Change (March/April): 44–50.Google Scholar
  8. Blau, Peter M., and Marshall W. Meyer. 1986. Bureaucracy in Modern Society, third edition. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  9. Boyer, Ernest L. 1990. Scholarship Reconsidered. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.Google Scholar
  10. —. 1987. College: The Undergraduate Experience in America. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  11. Boyer Commission (on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University). 1998. Reinventing Undergraduate Education. Stony Brook, NY: State University of New York.Google Scholar
  12. Burris, Val. 2004. “The Academic Caste System: Prestige Hierarchies in PhD Exchange Networks.” American Sociological Review 69: 239–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. 2000. “The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education.” Stanford, CA: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Retrieved December 21, 2004 (http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/Classiflcation/) Google Scholar
  14. College Board. 2002. “SAT-ACT Score Comparisons.” New York: College Board. Retrieved December 21, 2004 (http://www.collegeboard.com/prod_downloads/about/news_info/cbsenior/yr2002/pdf/ten.pdf) Google Scholar
  15. Council on Undergraduate Research. 2004. “Council on Undergraduate Research: Learning Through Research.” Washington, D.C.: Council on Undergraduate Research. Retrieved December 21, 2004 (http:/ /www.cur.org). Google Scholar
  16. Crane, Diana. 1972. Invisible Colleges. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. Crozier, Michel. 1964. The Bureaucratic Phenomenon. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Diamond, Nancy, and Hugh Davis Graham. 2001. “How Should We Rate Research Universities?” Change (July/August): 21–33.Google Scholar
  19. Hartley, James E., and Michael D. Robinson. 2001. “Sociology Research at Liberal Arts Colleges.” The American Sociologist 32:60–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Institute for Scientific Information. 1996. Journal Citation Reports. Philadelphia: Institute for Scientific Information.Google Scholar
  21. Keith, Bruce, and Nicholas Babchuk. 1998. “The Quest for Institutional Recognition: A Longitudinal Analysis of Scholarly Productivity and Academic Prestige among Sociology Departments.” Social Forces 76:1495–1533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Markovsky, Barry. 2000. “Departments Ranked by Journal Publications.” Footnotes 28 (February): 1, 10.Google Scholar
  23. Merton, Robert. 1968. “The Matthew Effect in Science.” Science 159(5 January):56–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moody, James. 2004. “The Structure of a Social Science Collaboration Network: Disciplinary Cohesion from 1963 to 1999.” American Sociological Review 69:213–238.Google Scholar
  25. Oromaner, Mark. 1973. “Productivity and Recognition of Sociology Departments.” Sociological Focus 6:83–89.Google Scholar
  26. Paxton, Pamela, and Kenneth Bollen. 2003. “Perceived Quality and Methodology in Graduate Department Ratings: The Case of Sociology, Political Science, and Economics.” Sociology of Education 76:71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Peterson’s. 2001. 4-Year Colleges, 32nd Edition. Lawrenceville, NJ: Peterson’s/Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
  28. Phelen, Thomas J. 1995. “Measures of Success in American Sociology.” Sociological Forum 10:481–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schevitz, Tanya. 2004. “Debate on Growth of Research at CSU Campuses: Trend Seen in State University System.” San Francisco Chronicle (February 23):A1.Google Scholar
  30. Spalter-Roth, Roberta, and Stacey Merola. 2002. “Where Do the High Publishers Go? Graduate School Pathway to Early Career Publications and Academic Positions.” Annual Meeting of the Southwestern Sociological Association, New Orleans.Google Scholar
  31. Testa, James. 2004. “The ISI Database: The Journal Selection Process.” Philadelphia: Institute for Scientific Information. Retrieved December 21, 2004 (http://www.isinet.com/essays/selectionofmaterialfor coverage/199701. html/) Google Scholar
  32. U.S. News & World Report. 2002. America ’s Best Colleges, 2003 Edition. Washington, DC: U.S. News and World Report LP.Google Scholar
  33. Wolfe, Alan. 1990. “Books vs. Articles: Two Ways of Publishing Sociology.” Sociological Forum 5:477–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Transaction Publisher 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Douglas Eckberg
    • 1
  • Jonathan Marx
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Sociology and AnthropologyWinthrop UniversityRock HillUSA
  2. 2.Winthrop UniversityRock HillUSA

Personalised recommendations